慢性心力衰竭患者对心脏再同步化疗法的反应预测因素:心血管中心的 10 年经验。

Juan C Plata-Corona, Fabio Solis-Jiménez, Maximiliano Flores-Flamand, Carlos A Dattoli-García, Ángel A Priego-Ranero, Jorge D Sierra-Lara, Carlos R Sierra-Fernández
{"title":"慢性心力衰竭患者对心脏再同步化疗法的反应预测因素:心血管中心的 10 年经验。","authors":"Juan C Plata-Corona, Fabio Solis-Jiménez, Maximiliano Flores-Flamand, Carlos A Dattoli-García, Ángel A Priego-Ranero, Jorge D Sierra-Lara, Carlos R Sierra-Fernández","doi":"10.24875/ACM.22000252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been established as an effective therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Randomized clinical trials have shown its impact on mortality and HF hospitalizations, as well as improvement of symptoms and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Finding clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables that may predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center, observational, analytic, and retrospective study that included 102 patients with heart failure (HF) diagnosis who underwent CRT according to guideline-directed therapy from January 2010 to April 2020 in a third-level center. CRT response was defined as an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class in at least 1 category associated with a recovery of ≥ 5% in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study population was 102 patients of which 61 (59.8%) were men. The mean age at HF diagnosis was 54 ± 18.7 years. Ischemic heart disease was the etiology in 37 (36.3%) cases. Fifty-one (50%) patients were classified as responders. Responders had wider QRS, and lower LVEF and right ventricular fractional area change at baseline. After CRT, responders had a greater reduction of QRS duration, and improvement in LVEF, global longitudinal strain, and echocardiographic dyssynchrony parameters. Multivariate regression analysis showed that left bundle branch block (LBBB), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and baseline difference of pre-ejection periods were predictors of a positive response to CRT in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBB, TAPSE, LVEDV, and pre-ejection time difference are independent variables that can predict adequate response to CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":93885,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":"94 1","pages":"15-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response predictors to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure: a 10-year-cardiovascular center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Juan C Plata-Corona, Fabio Solis-Jiménez, Maximiliano Flores-Flamand, Carlos A Dattoli-García, Ángel A Priego-Ranero, Jorge D Sierra-Lara, Carlos R Sierra-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/ACM.22000252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been established as an effective therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Randomized clinical trials have shown its impact on mortality and HF hospitalizations, as well as improvement of symptoms and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Finding clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables that may predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center, observational, analytic, and retrospective study that included 102 patients with heart failure (HF) diagnosis who underwent CRT according to guideline-directed therapy from January 2010 to April 2020 in a third-level center. CRT response was defined as an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class in at least 1 category associated with a recovery of ≥ 5% in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study population was 102 patients of which 61 (59.8%) were men. The mean age at HF diagnosis was 54 ± 18.7 years. Ischemic heart disease was the etiology in 37 (36.3%) cases. Fifty-one (50%) patients were classified as responders. Responders had wider QRS, and lower LVEF and right ventricular fractional area change at baseline. After CRT, responders had a greater reduction of QRS duration, and improvement in LVEF, global longitudinal strain, and echocardiographic dyssynchrony parameters. Multivariate regression analysis showed that left bundle branch block (LBBB), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and baseline difference of pre-ejection periods were predictors of a positive response to CRT in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBB, TAPSE, LVEDV, and pre-ejection time difference are independent variables that can predict adequate response to CRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"15-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160518/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.22000252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.22000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏再同步化疗法(CRT)已被确定为治疗射血分数降低型心力衰竭的有效疗法。随机临床试验显示,CRT 对死亡率和心力衰竭住院率有影响,并能改善症状和生活质量:寻找可预测心脏再同步化疗法(CRT)反应的临床、心电图和超声心动图变量:我们进行了一项单中心、观察性、分析性和回顾性研究,纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 4 月期间在一家三级中心根据指南指导接受 CRT 治疗的 102 名确诊为心力衰竭(HF)的患者。CRT反应的定义是纽约心脏协会功能分级至少改善1级,左室射血分数(LVEF)恢复≥5%:研究对象为 102 名患者,其中 61 名(59.8%)为男性。确诊为房颤的平均年龄为 54 ± 18.7 岁。37例(36.3%)患者的病因是缺血性心脏病。51例(50%)患者被列为应答者。应答者的 QRS 较宽,基线时 LVEF 和右心室折返面积变化较小。接受 CRT 治疗后,应答者的 QRS 时程缩短幅度更大,LVEF、整体纵向应变和超声心动图不同步参数均有所改善。多变量回归分析表明,左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)、左室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)和射血前期基线差异是该人群对CRT作出积极反应的预测因素:结论:LBBB、TAPSE、LVEDV 和射血前时间差是可以预测对 CRT 适当反应的独立变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response predictors to cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure: a 10-year-cardiovascular center experience.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been established as an effective therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Randomized clinical trials have shown its impact on mortality and HF hospitalizations, as well as improvement of symptoms and quality of life.

Objectives: Finding clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic variables that may predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods: We performed a single-center, observational, analytic, and retrospective study that included 102 patients with heart failure (HF) diagnosis who underwent CRT according to guideline-directed therapy from January 2010 to April 2020 in a third-level center. CRT response was defined as an improvement of New York Heart Association functional class in at least 1 category associated with a recovery of ≥ 5% in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results: Our study population was 102 patients of which 61 (59.8%) were men. The mean age at HF diagnosis was 54 ± 18.7 years. Ischemic heart disease was the etiology in 37 (36.3%) cases. Fifty-one (50%) patients were classified as responders. Responders had wider QRS, and lower LVEF and right ventricular fractional area change at baseline. After CRT, responders had a greater reduction of QRS duration, and improvement in LVEF, global longitudinal strain, and echocardiographic dyssynchrony parameters. Multivariate regression analysis showed that left bundle branch block (LBBB), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and baseline difference of pre-ejection periods were predictors of a positive response to CRT in this population.

Conclusions: LBBB, TAPSE, LVEDV, and pre-ejection time difference are independent variables that can predict adequate response to CRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in general wards and intensive care units: Insights from the RIMAC cardiopulmonary imaging registry across Latin American centers. Comment on the firsts insights of the arterial hypertension study in México (RIHTA): are we doing things right? Instituto y no hospital. La distintiva organización que Ignacio Chávez concibió para combatir integralmente a las enfermedades del corazón en México. En el octogésimo aniversario del Instituto Nacional de Cardiología. [Right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. About three patients without coronary ostium atresia. Is a transient percutaneous decompression maneuver necessary?] [Clinical characterization of patients with complete fetal atrioventricular block].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1