Mohammed Ali, Chryssa Neo, Aysha Rajeev, Sharad Bhatnagar
{"title":"虚弱评分在非手术治疗股骨颈外翻骨折中的预测作用","authors":"Mohammed Ali, Chryssa Neo, Aysha Rajeev, Sharad Bhatnagar","doi":"10.14712/18059694.2024.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The management of valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture is controversial between operative and conservative treatments. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Clinical frailty Score for predicting the prognosis of patients who underwent non-operative treatment for the valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture (NOF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centred retrospective review of patients admitted with valgus impacted NOF. Data were collected from patients' records, including demographics, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Patients were followed up to 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients who were treated non-operatively with a mean follow-up of 2.6 years met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients failed the non-operative treatment and required replacement surgeries, while 29 had successful outcomes (50%). There were no differences between the two groups' mean age and gender distributions (P 0.527 and 0.139, respectively). The successful group had significantly higher CFS (P 0.013), worse AMTS and higher mortality risk based on the NHFS (P 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that CFS, AMTS and NHFS can be used as predictors when considering non-operative treatment for the valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture. Patients who are frail, demented and high risk based on the NHFS have higher success rates with non-operative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":101400,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove)","volume":"66 3","pages":"112-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Frailty Scores to Predict the Outcomes in Non Operative Treatment of Valgus Impacted Neck of Femur Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Ali, Chryssa Neo, Aysha Rajeev, Sharad Bhatnagar\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/18059694.2024.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The management of valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture is controversial between operative and conservative treatments. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Clinical frailty Score for predicting the prognosis of patients who underwent non-operative treatment for the valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture (NOF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centred retrospective review of patients admitted with valgus impacted NOF. Data were collected from patients' records, including demographics, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Patients were followed up to 24 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients who were treated non-operatively with a mean follow-up of 2.6 years met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients failed the non-operative treatment and required replacement surgeries, while 29 had successful outcomes (50%). There were no differences between the two groups' mean age and gender distributions (P 0.527 and 0.139, respectively). The successful group had significantly higher CFS (P 0.013), worse AMTS and higher mortality risk based on the NHFS (P 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that CFS, AMTS and NHFS can be used as predictors when considering non-operative treatment for the valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture. Patients who are frail, demented and high risk based on the NHFS have higher success rates with non-operative treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove)\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"112-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica (Hradec Kralove)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2024.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:股骨颈外翻撞击性骨折的治疗在手术治疗和保守治疗之间存在争议。本研究旨在探讨临床虚弱评分在预测接受非手术治疗的股骨颈外翻撞击性骨折(NOF)患者的预后方面的实用性:方法:对因股骨颈外翻撞击性骨折入院的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。从患者病历中收集数据,包括人口统计学、临床虚弱评分(CFS)、诺丁汉髋部骨折评分(NHFS)和简短智力测验评分(AMTS)。术后对患者进行了长达24个月的随访:58名接受非手术治疗的患者符合我们的纳入标准,平均随访时间为2.6年。29 名患者非手术治疗失败,需要进行置换手术,29 名患者(50%)治疗成功。两组患者的平均年龄和性别分布没有差异(P 分别为 0.527 和 0.139)。成功组的 CFS 明显更高(P 0.013),AMTS 更差,根据 NHFS 计算的死亡风险更高(分别为 P 0.006 和 P <0.001):本研究表明,在考虑对股骨颈外翻撞击性骨折进行非手术治疗时,CFS、AMTS和NHFS可作为预测指标。根据NHFS,体弱、痴呆和高风险患者的非手术治疗成功率更高。
The Role of Frailty Scores to Predict the Outcomes in Non Operative Treatment of Valgus Impacted Neck of Femur Fractures.
Objectives: The management of valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture is controversial between operative and conservative treatments. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Clinical frailty Score for predicting the prognosis of patients who underwent non-operative treatment for the valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture (NOF).
Methods: A single-centred retrospective review of patients admitted with valgus impacted NOF. Data were collected from patients' records, including demographics, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Patients were followed up to 24 months postoperatively.
Results: Fifty-eight patients who were treated non-operatively with a mean follow-up of 2.6 years met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients failed the non-operative treatment and required replacement surgeries, while 29 had successful outcomes (50%). There were no differences between the two groups' mean age and gender distributions (P 0.527 and 0.139, respectively). The successful group had significantly higher CFS (P 0.013), worse AMTS and higher mortality risk based on the NHFS (P 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CFS, AMTS and NHFS can be used as predictors when considering non-operative treatment for the valgus-impacted neck of femur fracture. Patients who are frail, demented and high risk based on the NHFS have higher success rates with non-operative treatment.