医学博士/博士学员的急诊医学住院医师培训途径:全国医生-科学家培训项目横断面研究

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10960
Karen Cyndari MD, PhD, Libby White, Philip A. Mudd MD, PhD, J. Priyanka Vakkalanka PhD, Sydney Krispin MPH, MA, Kelli Wallace MS, Megan Schagrin MBA, Nicholas Mohr MD, MS
{"title":"医学博士/博士学员的急诊医学住院医师培训途径:全国医生-科学家培训项目横断面研究","authors":"Karen Cyndari MD, PhD,&nbsp;Libby White,&nbsp;Philip A. Mudd MD, PhD,&nbsp;J. Priyanka Vakkalanka PhD,&nbsp;Sydney Krispin MPH, MA,&nbsp;Kelli Wallace MS,&nbsp;Megan Schagrin MBA,&nbsp;Nicholas Mohr MD, MS","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Combined clinical and research training is common in residency programs outside emergency medicine (EM), and these pathways are particularly valuable for combined MD/PhD graduates planning to pursue a career as a physician-scientist. However, EM departments may not know what resources to provide these trainees during residency to create research-focused, productive, future faculty, and trainees may not know which programs support their goal of becoming a physician-scientist in EM. The objective of this study was to describe research training and resources available to MD/PhD graduates in EM residency training with a focus on dedicated research pathways.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was a cross-sectional inventory conducted through an electronic survey of EM residency program directors. We sought to identify dedicated MD/PhD research training pathways, with a focus on both resources and training priorities. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We collected 192 survey responses (69.6% response rate). Among respondents, 41 programs (21.4%) offered a research pathway/track, 52 (27.4%) offered a research fellowship, 22 (11.5%) offered both a residency research pathway/track and a research fellowship, and two (1.0%) offered a dedicated EM physician-scientist training pathway. Most programs considered research a priority and were enthusiastic about interviewing applicants planning a research career, but recruitment of physician-scientist applicants was not generally prioritized.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Some EM residency programs offer combined clinical and mentored research training for prospective physician-scientists, and nearly all residency programs considered research important. Future work will focus on improving the EM physician-scientist pipeline by optimizing pathways available to trainees during residency and fellowship.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10960","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency medicine residency pathways for MD/PhD trainees: A national cross-sectional study of physician-scientist training programs\",\"authors\":\"Karen Cyndari MD, PhD,&nbsp;Libby White,&nbsp;Philip A. Mudd MD, PhD,&nbsp;J. Priyanka Vakkalanka PhD,&nbsp;Sydney Krispin MPH, MA,&nbsp;Kelli Wallace MS,&nbsp;Megan Schagrin MBA,&nbsp;Nicholas Mohr MD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Combined clinical and research training is common in residency programs outside emergency medicine (EM), and these pathways are particularly valuable for combined MD/PhD graduates planning to pursue a career as a physician-scientist. However, EM departments may not know what resources to provide these trainees during residency to create research-focused, productive, future faculty, and trainees may not know which programs support their goal of becoming a physician-scientist in EM. The objective of this study was to describe research training and resources available to MD/PhD graduates in EM residency training with a focus on dedicated research pathways.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study was a cross-sectional inventory conducted through an electronic survey of EM residency program directors. We sought to identify dedicated MD/PhD research training pathways, with a focus on both resources and training priorities. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey responses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We collected 192 survey responses (69.6% response rate). Among respondents, 41 programs (21.4%) offered a research pathway/track, 52 (27.4%) offered a research fellowship, 22 (11.5%) offered both a residency research pathway/track and a research fellowship, and two (1.0%) offered a dedicated EM physician-scientist training pathway. Most programs considered research a priority and were enthusiastic about interviewing applicants planning a research career, but recruitment of physician-scientist applicants was not generally prioritized.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Some EM residency programs offer combined clinical and mentored research training for prospective physician-scientists, and nearly all residency programs considered research important. Future work will focus on improving the EM physician-scientist pipeline by optimizing pathways available to trainees during residency and fellowship.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10960\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在急诊医学(EM)以外的住院医师培训项目中,临床与研究相结合的培训很常见,这些培训途径对于计划从事医生-科学家职业的医学博士/博士联合毕业生尤其有价值。然而,急诊医学系可能不知道在住院医师培训期间应为这些学员提供哪些资源,以培养注重研究、富有成效的未来教师队伍,学员也可能不知道哪些项目支持他们成为急诊医学科的医生科学家这一目标。本研究的目的是描述医学博士/博士毕业生在急诊科住院医师培训中可获得的研究培训和资源,重点是专门的研究途径。 方法 本研究是通过对急诊科住院医师培训项目主任的电子调查进行的横断面调查。我们试图找出专门的医学博士/博士研究培训途径,重点关注资源和培训优先事项。我们使用了描述性统计来总结调查回复。 结果 我们共收集到 192 份调查回复(回复率为 69.6%)。在回复者中,41个项目(21.4%)提供了研究途径/方向,52个项目(27.4%)提供了研究奖学金,22个项目(11.5%)同时提供了住院医师研究途径/方向和研究奖学金,2个项目(1.0%)提供了专门的急诊科医生-科学家培训途径。大多数项目认为研究是优先事项,并热衷于面试计划从事研究工作的申请人,但一般不优先招聘医生-科学家申请人。 结论 一些急诊科住院医师培训项目为未来的医生科学家提供临床和指导研究相结合的培训,几乎所有的住院医师培训项目都认为研究很重要。今后的工作重点是通过优化住院医师和研究员培训期间受训者的途径来改善急诊科医生-科学家的渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency medicine residency pathways for MD/PhD trainees: A national cross-sectional study of physician-scientist training programs

Background

Combined clinical and research training is common in residency programs outside emergency medicine (EM), and these pathways are particularly valuable for combined MD/PhD graduates planning to pursue a career as a physician-scientist. However, EM departments may not know what resources to provide these trainees during residency to create research-focused, productive, future faculty, and trainees may not know which programs support their goal of becoming a physician-scientist in EM. The objective of this study was to describe research training and resources available to MD/PhD graduates in EM residency training with a focus on dedicated research pathways.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional inventory conducted through an electronic survey of EM residency program directors. We sought to identify dedicated MD/PhD research training pathways, with a focus on both resources and training priorities. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey responses.

Results

We collected 192 survey responses (69.6% response rate). Among respondents, 41 programs (21.4%) offered a research pathway/track, 52 (27.4%) offered a research fellowship, 22 (11.5%) offered both a residency research pathway/track and a research fellowship, and two (1.0%) offered a dedicated EM physician-scientist training pathway. Most programs considered research a priority and were enthusiastic about interviewing applicants planning a research career, but recruitment of physician-scientist applicants was not generally prioritized.

Conclusions

Some EM residency programs offer combined clinical and mentored research training for prospective physician-scientists, and nearly all residency programs considered research important. Future work will focus on improving the EM physician-scientist pipeline by optimizing pathways available to trainees during residency and fellowship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Changing behavior and promoting clinical empathy through a patient experience curriculum for health profession students Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1