解除治疗师效应:通过使用不同的治疗结果对治疗师进行分组。

Pauline Janse, Naline Geurtzen, Agathe Scappini, Giel Hutschemaekers
{"title":"解除治疗师效应:通过使用不同的治疗结果对治疗师进行分组。","authors":"Pauline Janse,&nbsp;Naline Geurtzen,&nbsp;Agathe Scappini,&nbsp;Giel Hutschemaekers","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01365-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous studies have shown that therapists’ performance varies, known as therapist effects, and have indicated that therapists who excel in one treatment outcome may not necessarily be effective in other outcomes. This observational naturalistic study aimed to enhance our understanding of therapist effects and the assessment of therapists’ performance in different areas. The study included 68 therapists and 5,582 clients from a large mental health facility. Information about their learning activities was available for a subsample of 49 therapists. Separate multilevel analyses were conducted for treatment outcomes, including case mix-corrected OQ-45 change scores, dropout rates, referrals to other facilities, treatment duration, and client satisfaction ratings. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify groups of therapists based on their performance across various treatment outcomes. Additionally, differences in therapist characteristics among the clusters identified were examined. Therapist effects varied across different outcomes, ranging from small (2.6% for OQ-45 change) to moderate (6.5% for number of sessions). The cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters of therapists with specific profiles. They had performance differences in certain areas but not in others. This exploratory study supports the notion that therapists exhibit diverse profiles regarding treatment outcomes. These findings are significant for future investigations of therapist effects that aim to identify the characteristics of effective therapists and in the context of personalizing treatment for clients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"51 5","pages":"769 - 779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling the Therapist Effect: Clustering Therapists by Using Different Treatment Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Janse,&nbsp;Naline Geurtzen,&nbsp;Agathe Scappini,&nbsp;Giel Hutschemaekers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10488-024-01365-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous studies have shown that therapists’ performance varies, known as therapist effects, and have indicated that therapists who excel in one treatment outcome may not necessarily be effective in other outcomes. This observational naturalistic study aimed to enhance our understanding of therapist effects and the assessment of therapists’ performance in different areas. The study included 68 therapists and 5,582 clients from a large mental health facility. Information about their learning activities was available for a subsample of 49 therapists. Separate multilevel analyses were conducted for treatment outcomes, including case mix-corrected OQ-45 change scores, dropout rates, referrals to other facilities, treatment duration, and client satisfaction ratings. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify groups of therapists based on their performance across various treatment outcomes. Additionally, differences in therapist characteristics among the clusters identified were examined. Therapist effects varied across different outcomes, ranging from small (2.6% for OQ-45 change) to moderate (6.5% for number of sessions). The cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters of therapists with specific profiles. They had performance differences in certain areas but not in others. This exploratory study supports the notion that therapists exhibit diverse profiles regarding treatment outcomes. These findings are significant for future investigations of therapist effects that aim to identify the characteristics of effective therapists and in the context of personalizing treatment for clients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"51 5\",\"pages\":\"769 - 779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379780/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01365-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-024-01365-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究表明,治疗师的表现各不相同,即所谓的治疗师效应,并指出在某一治疗结果上表现出色的治疗师不一定在其他结果上也有效。这项自然观察研究旨在加深我们对治疗师效应的理解,并评估治疗师在不同领域的表现。研究对象包括一家大型心理健康机构的 68 名治疗师和 5,582 名客户。49 名治疗师的子样本中包含了有关他们学习活动的信息。对治疗结果进行了单独的多层次分析,包括病例组合校正后的 OQ-45 变化分数、辍学率、转诊到其他机构的情况、治疗持续时间和客户满意度评分。根据治疗师在各种治疗结果中的表现,进行了分层聚类分析,以确定治疗师群体。此外,还研究了所确定的聚类中治疗师特征的差异。治疗师对不同结果的影响各不相同,从较小(OQ-45 变化为 2.6%)到中等(治疗次数为 6.5%)不等。聚类分析揭示了具有特定特征的四个不同治疗师聚类。他们在某些方面有表现差异,而在其他方面则没有。这项探索性研究支持了治疗师在治疗结果方面表现出不同特征的观点。这些发现对于未来旨在识别有效治疗师特征的治疗师效果调查以及为客户提供个性化治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disentangling the Therapist Effect: Clustering Therapists by Using Different Treatment Outcomes

Previous studies have shown that therapists’ performance varies, known as therapist effects, and have indicated that therapists who excel in one treatment outcome may not necessarily be effective in other outcomes. This observational naturalistic study aimed to enhance our understanding of therapist effects and the assessment of therapists’ performance in different areas. The study included 68 therapists and 5,582 clients from a large mental health facility. Information about their learning activities was available for a subsample of 49 therapists. Separate multilevel analyses were conducted for treatment outcomes, including case mix-corrected OQ-45 change scores, dropout rates, referrals to other facilities, treatment duration, and client satisfaction ratings. A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to identify groups of therapists based on their performance across various treatment outcomes. Additionally, differences in therapist characteristics among the clusters identified were examined. Therapist effects varied across different outcomes, ranging from small (2.6% for OQ-45 change) to moderate (6.5% for number of sessions). The cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters of therapists with specific profiles. They had performance differences in certain areas but not in others. This exploratory study supports the notion that therapists exhibit diverse profiles regarding treatment outcomes. These findings are significant for future investigations of therapist effects that aim to identify the characteristics of effective therapists and in the context of personalizing treatment for clients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Strategic Treatment and Assessment for Youth (STAY): A Theoretically-Driven, Culturally-Tailored MBC Approach. A Model for Understanding Lived Expertise to Support Effective Recruitment of Peer Roles. Life After EBPs: Characterizing Subsequent Engagement in Evidence-Based Psychotherapy After Completion of an Initial Trauma-Focused EBP in a National Sample of VA Patients. Should We Use Clinician Self-Report to Tailor Implementation Strategies? Predicting Use of Youth CBT with Clinician Self-Report Versus Direct Observation. Factors Influencing the Engagement with Electronic Mental Health Technologies: A Systematic Review of Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1