弹性链式下颌前缩矫正器不会增加双侧唇腭裂患者的颌骨间尺寸。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1177/10556656241241200
Hamad Burashed, Cory M Resnick, Elizabeth E Ross, John B Mulliken, Bonnie L Padwa
{"title":"弹性链式下颌前缩矫正器不会增加双侧唇腭裂患者的颌骨间尺寸。","authors":"Hamad Burashed, Cory M Resnick, Elizabeth E Ross, John B Mulliken, Bonnie L Padwa","doi":"10.1177/10556656241241200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the elastic chain premaxillary retraction (ECPR) appliance increases inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialized tertiary care facility.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>126 patients with BCLP; 75 had ECPR, 51 had no pre-surgical manipulation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three-dimensional facial photographs were obtained prior to insertion of appliance (T0), post-appliance therapy prior to appliance removal/labial repair (T1), and several months after labial repair (T2) for a longitudinal ECPR group, and were obtained after age 4 years (T3) for a non-longitudinal ECPR group and for the non-ECPR group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension (en-en, ex-ex) was determined for all groups/time-points. Measurements were compared between groups and to norms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean en-en and ex-ex was 32.6 ± 3.2 mm and 84.4 ± 6.3 mm for the ECPR group and 33.5 ± 3.1 mm and 86.7 ± 7.2 mm for the non-ECPR group at T3. Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimensions were significantly greater than normal (<i>P</i> < .05) in both groups; there was no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i> > .05). The mean en-en and ex-ex for the Longitudinal ECPR group was 27.5 ± 2.4 mm and 66.7 ± 3.7 mm at T0, 29.6 ± 2.4 mm and 70.4 ± 2.9 mm at T1, and 29.2 ± 2.3 mm and 72.3 ± 3.8 mm at T2. en-en and ex-ex increased significantly from T0-T1 (<i>P</i> < .05), decreased at T2 (<i>P</i> > .05) and was significantly larger than normal at all time-points (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension increased after ECPR but returned to baseline growth trajectory. These dimensions were above normal at all time-points. There was no difference between those that did and did not have dentofacial orthopedic manipulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elastic Chain Premaxillary Retraction Appliance Does Not Increase Inter-Canthal Dimension in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.\",\"authors\":\"Hamad Burashed, Cory M Resnick, Elizabeth E Ross, John B Mulliken, Bonnie L Padwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241241200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if the elastic chain premaxillary retraction (ECPR) appliance increases inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialized tertiary care facility.</p><p><strong>Patients, participants: </strong>126 patients with BCLP; 75 had ECPR, 51 had no pre-surgical manipulation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three-dimensional facial photographs were obtained prior to insertion of appliance (T0), post-appliance therapy prior to appliance removal/labial repair (T1), and several months after labial repair (T2) for a longitudinal ECPR group, and were obtained after age 4 years (T3) for a non-longitudinal ECPR group and for the non-ECPR group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension (en-en, ex-ex) was determined for all groups/time-points. Measurements were compared between groups and to norms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean en-en and ex-ex was 32.6 ± 3.2 mm and 84.4 ± 6.3 mm for the ECPR group and 33.5 ± 3.1 mm and 86.7 ± 7.2 mm for the non-ECPR group at T3. Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimensions were significantly greater than normal (<i>P</i> < .05) in both groups; there was no significant difference between groups (<i>P</i> > .05). The mean en-en and ex-ex for the Longitudinal ECPR group was 27.5 ± 2.4 mm and 66.7 ± 3.7 mm at T0, 29.6 ± 2.4 mm and 70.4 ± 2.9 mm at T1, and 29.2 ± 2.3 mm and 72.3 ± 3.8 mm at T2. en-en and ex-ex increased significantly from T0-T1 (<i>P</i> < .05), decreased at T2 (<i>P</i> > .05) and was significantly larger than normal at all time-points (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension increased after ECPR but returned to baseline growth trajectory. These dimensions were above normal at all time-points. There was no difference between those that did and did not have dentofacial orthopedic manipulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241241200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241241200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定弹力链颌前牵引器(ECPR)是否能增加双侧完全唇腭裂(BCLP)患者的中内侧和外侧颊隔间尺寸:确定弹性链颌前牵引(ECPR)矫治器是否能增加双侧完全唇腭裂(BCLP)患者的内侧和外侧颊隔间尺寸:设计:回顾性队列研究:患者、参与者:126 名双侧完全唇腭裂(BCLP)患者;75 名双侧完全唇腭裂(BCLP)患者:126名BCLP患者,其中75人进行了ECPR,51人术前未进行任何操作:纵向ECPR组在插入矫治器前(T0)、矫治器拆除/唇修复前(T1)和唇修复后数月(T2)拍摄面部三维照片,非纵向ECPR组和非ECPR组在4岁后(T3)拍摄面部三维照片:所有组别/时间点的内侧和外侧间距(en-en、ex-ex)均已确定。测量结果在组间进行比较,并与标准进行比较:结果:在 T3 阶段,ECPR 组的平均内、外径分别为 32.6 ± 3.2 毫米和 84.4 ± 6.3 毫米,非 ECPR 组的平均内、外径分别为 33.5 ± 3.1 毫米和 86.7 ± 7.2 毫米。眼眶内侧和外侧间的尺寸明显大于正常值(P P > .05)。纵向 ECPR 组的平均 en-en 和 ex-ex 在 T0 为 27.5 ± 2.4 mm 和 66.7 ± 3.7 mm,在 T1 为 29.6 ± 2.4 mm 和 70.4 ± 2.9 mm,在 T2 为 29.2 ± 2.3 mm 和 72.3 ± 3.8 mm:ECPR 后,眼干内侧和外侧间的尺寸增加,但又回到了基线生长轨迹。这些尺寸在所有时间点均高于正常值。接受和未接受颌面矫形手术的儿童之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elastic Chain Premaxillary Retraction Appliance Does Not Increase Inter-Canthal Dimension in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Objective: To determine if the elastic chain premaxillary retraction (ECPR) appliance increases inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension in patients with bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (BCLP).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Specialized tertiary care facility.

Patients, participants: 126 patients with BCLP; 75 had ECPR, 51 had no pre-surgical manipulation.

Interventions: Three-dimensional facial photographs were obtained prior to insertion of appliance (T0), post-appliance therapy prior to appliance removal/labial repair (T1), and several months after labial repair (T2) for a longitudinal ECPR group, and were obtained after age 4 years (T3) for a non-longitudinal ECPR group and for the non-ECPR group.

Main outcome measures: Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension (en-en, ex-ex) was determined for all groups/time-points. Measurements were compared between groups and to norms.

Results: The mean en-en and ex-ex was 32.6 ± 3.2 mm and 84.4 ± 6.3 mm for the ECPR group and 33.5 ± 3.1 mm and 86.7 ± 7.2 mm for the non-ECPR group at T3. Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimensions were significantly greater than normal (P < .05) in both groups; there was no significant difference between groups (P > .05). The mean en-en and ex-ex for the Longitudinal ECPR group was 27.5 ± 2.4 mm and 66.7 ± 3.7 mm at T0, 29.6 ± 2.4 mm and 70.4 ± 2.9 mm at T1, and 29.2 ± 2.3 mm and 72.3 ± 3.8 mm at T2. en-en and ex-ex increased significantly from T0-T1 (P < .05), decreased at T2 (P > .05) and was significantly larger than normal at all time-points (P < .05).

Conclusions: Inter-medial and inter-lateral canthal dimension increased after ECPR but returned to baseline growth trajectory. These dimensions were above normal at all time-points. There was no difference between those that did and did not have dentofacial orthopedic manipulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Caring for a Child with a Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Narrative Review. Effect of Age and Gender on Nasalance Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review. Expanding Accessibility in Cleft Care: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Literacy of Alveolar Bone Grafting Information. Postoperative Feeding in Cleft Surgery: A Systematic Review. Reduction Cranioplasty in Cases of Hydrocephalic Macrocephaly: Pearls and Pitfalls of Computer-Assisted Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1