交互式无意识偏见培训对围术期学员的影响。

Rebecca P Chen, Janette Tang, LaMisha N Hill Weller, Christy K Boscardin, Odinakachukwu A Ehie
{"title":"交互式无意识偏见培训对围术期学员的影响。","authors":"Rebecca P Chen, Janette Tang, LaMisha N Hill Weller, Christy K Boscardin, Odinakachukwu A Ehie","doi":"10.46374/volxxvi_issue1_ehie","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providers' unconscious biases reinforce health disparities through negative direct patient care and interactions with colleagues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We created a workshop grounded in Critical Race Theory and the importance of different intersectionalities to improve medical trainees' self-assessment of their implicit biases in curated facilitated spaces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 44 UCSF first-year clinical anesthesiology residents (CA-1) (95% response rate) and 23 surgery residents in their research year (77% response rate) participated in this workshop over 4 separate sessions in September 2020 and 2021. Quantitative data from a pre-/post-workshop survey was analyzed via a paired <i>t</i> test to evaluate our workshop's effectiveness. Feedback on efficacy was obtained by coding themes from our survey's open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The workshop was evaluated positively by a total of 65 of 67 participants in the post-workshop survey. On a 5-point Likert scale, participants self-reported they agreed that their unconscious biases affect their clinical interactions from a pre-workshop mean of 3.3 (SD ± 1.32) to a post-workshop mean of 3.9 (SD ± 0.87, <i>P</i> = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that this workshop was effective for perioperative residents and can be extrapolated to all residents by tailoring the workshop to their respective work environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"26 1","pages":"E721"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of an Interactive Unconscious Bias Training on Perioperative Learners.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca P Chen, Janette Tang, LaMisha N Hill Weller, Christy K Boscardin, Odinakachukwu A Ehie\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxvi_issue1_ehie\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providers' unconscious biases reinforce health disparities through negative direct patient care and interactions with colleagues.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We created a workshop grounded in Critical Race Theory and the importance of different intersectionalities to improve medical trainees' self-assessment of their implicit biases in curated facilitated spaces.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 44 UCSF first-year clinical anesthesiology residents (CA-1) (95% response rate) and 23 surgery residents in their research year (77% response rate) participated in this workshop over 4 separate sessions in September 2020 and 2021. Quantitative data from a pre-/post-workshop survey was analyzed via a paired <i>t</i> test to evaluate our workshop's effectiveness. Feedback on efficacy was obtained by coding themes from our survey's open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The workshop was evaluated positively by a total of 65 of 67 participants in the post-workshop survey. On a 5-point Likert scale, participants self-reported they agreed that their unconscious biases affect their clinical interactions from a pre-workshop mean of 3.3 (SD ± 1.32) to a post-workshop mean of 3.9 (SD ± 0.87, <i>P</i> = .008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that this workshop was effective for perioperative residents and can be extrapolated to all residents by tailoring the workshop to their respective work environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"E721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954045/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxvi_issue1_ehie\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxvi_issue1_ehie","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗服务提供者的无意识偏见通过与患者的直接护理和同事之间的消极互动,加剧了健康差异:医务人员无意识的偏见会通过对患者的直接护理以及与同事的互动加深健康差异:我们创建了一个以批判种族理论和不同交叉性的重要性为基础的工作坊,以提高医学学员在策划促进的空间中对其隐性偏见的自我评估能力:共有 44 名加州大学旧金山分校一年级临床麻醉学住院医师(CA-1)(回复率为 95%)和 23 名研究年级外科住院医师(回复率为 77%)参加了 2020 年 9 月和 2021 年 9 月的 4 次研讨会。我们通过配对 t 检验分析了研讨会前后调查的定量数据,以评估研讨会的效果。通过对调查开放式问题中的主题进行编码,获得了对成效的反馈:在工作坊结束后的调查中,67 名参与者中共有 65 人对工作坊给予了积极评价。在 5 点李克特量表上,学员们自称同意他们的无意识偏见会影响他们的临床互动,从研讨会前的平均值 3.3(SD ± 1.32)到研讨会后的平均值 3.9(SD ± 0.87,P = .008):我们的研究结果表明,该研讨会对围术期住院医师很有效,并可根据住院医师各自的工作环境进行调整,从而推广到所有住院医师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of an Interactive Unconscious Bias Training on Perioperative Learners.

Background: Providers' unconscious biases reinforce health disparities through negative direct patient care and interactions with colleagues.

Objective: We created a workshop grounded in Critical Race Theory and the importance of different intersectionalities to improve medical trainees' self-assessment of their implicit biases in curated facilitated spaces.

Methods: A total of 44 UCSF first-year clinical anesthesiology residents (CA-1) (95% response rate) and 23 surgery residents in their research year (77% response rate) participated in this workshop over 4 separate sessions in September 2020 and 2021. Quantitative data from a pre-/post-workshop survey was analyzed via a paired t test to evaluate our workshop's effectiveness. Feedback on efficacy was obtained by coding themes from our survey's open-ended questions.

Results: The workshop was evaluated positively by a total of 65 of 67 participants in the post-workshop survey. On a 5-point Likert scale, participants self-reported they agreed that their unconscious biases affect their clinical interactions from a pre-workshop mean of 3.3 (SD ± 1.32) to a post-workshop mean of 3.9 (SD ± 0.87, P = .008).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that this workshop was effective for perioperative residents and can be extrapolated to all residents by tailoring the workshop to their respective work environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1