比较两种不同浓度的阿法沙酮与咪达唑仑联合使用来麻醉猕猴(Macaca fascicularis)以进行褶皱测量。

Comparative medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000069
Robert J Edwards, Jeanean M Ghering, Ondraya M Frick, Kirby S Pasloske, Kacee H Santos, Summer M Astleford, Charles E White, Brianna M Marion
{"title":"比较两种不同浓度的阿法沙酮与咪达唑仑联合使用来麻醉猕猴(Macaca fascicularis)以进行褶皱测量。","authors":"Robert J Edwards, Jeanean M Ghering, Ondraya M Frick, Kirby S Pasloske, Kacee H Santos, Summer M Astleford, Charles E White, Brianna M Marion","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plethysmography is employed in nonhuman primates (NHPs) to calculate respiratory minute volume and determine the exposure time required to deliver an aerosol at the target dose. Anesthetic drugs can impact breathing parameters like steady-state minute volume (SSMV) central to aerosol dosing. Alfaxalone-midazolam mixtures (AM) provide superior parameters for plethysmography in cynomolgus macaques. An obstacle to the use of AM is the volume required to anesthetize via intramuscular injection. A more concentrated formulation of alfaxalone will reduce injection volumes and refine AM protocols. The purpose of this study was to compare AM using the Indexed 10-mg/mL (AM10) formulation compared with an investigational 40-mg/mL (AM40) formulation for IM administration in cynomolgus macaques undergoing plethysmography. We hypothesized that AM10 and AM40 would show no difference in quality of anesthesia (QA), duration of anesthesia, SSMV, accumulated minute volume (AMV), and side effects. We also hypothesized that female macaques would have a longer duration of anesthesia compared with males using both formulations. The study used 15 cynomolgus macaques comprised of 8 females and 7 males. NHPs were compared between 2 separate and randomized anesthetic events no less than one week apart. Each animal served as its own control and animals were randomized by random number generation. Anesthetized NHPs were placed in a sealed plethysmography chamber, and minute volume measurements were calculated every 10 s to determine SSMV. Once SSMV was achieved for 20 min, the trial ended. There were no statistically significant differences between AM10 and AM40 for duration of anesthesia, SSMV, AMV, side effects, or QA. AM40 had a significantly smaller injection volume. Females did not show a significantly longer median duration of anesthesia using either of the alfaxalone formulations. Overall, AM40 offers a more humane anesthetic than AM10 for plethysmography in cynomolgus macaques.</p>","PeriodicalId":93950,"journal":{"name":"Comparative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Different Alfaxalone Concentrations Combined with Midazolam to Anesthetize Cynomolgus Macaques (<i>Macaca fascicularis</i>) for Plethysmography.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J Edwards, Jeanean M Ghering, Ondraya M Frick, Kirby S Pasloske, Kacee H Santos, Summer M Astleford, Charles E White, Brianna M Marion\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plethysmography is employed in nonhuman primates (NHPs) to calculate respiratory minute volume and determine the exposure time required to deliver an aerosol at the target dose. Anesthetic drugs can impact breathing parameters like steady-state minute volume (SSMV) central to aerosol dosing. Alfaxalone-midazolam mixtures (AM) provide superior parameters for plethysmography in cynomolgus macaques. An obstacle to the use of AM is the volume required to anesthetize via intramuscular injection. A more concentrated formulation of alfaxalone will reduce injection volumes and refine AM protocols. The purpose of this study was to compare AM using the Indexed 10-mg/mL (AM10) formulation compared with an investigational 40-mg/mL (AM40) formulation for IM administration in cynomolgus macaques undergoing plethysmography. We hypothesized that AM10 and AM40 would show no difference in quality of anesthesia (QA), duration of anesthesia, SSMV, accumulated minute volume (AMV), and side effects. We also hypothesized that female macaques would have a longer duration of anesthesia compared with males using both formulations. The study used 15 cynomolgus macaques comprised of 8 females and 7 males. NHPs were compared between 2 separate and randomized anesthetic events no less than one week apart. Each animal served as its own control and animals were randomized by random number generation. Anesthetized NHPs were placed in a sealed plethysmography chamber, and minute volume measurements were calculated every 10 s to determine SSMV. Once SSMV was achieved for 20 min, the trial ended. There were no statistically significant differences between AM10 and AM40 for duration of anesthesia, SSMV, AMV, side effects, or QA. AM40 had a significantly smaller injection volume. Females did not show a significantly longer median duration of anesthesia using either of the alfaxalone formulations. Overall, AM40 offers a more humane anesthetic than AM10 for plethysmography in cynomolgus macaques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11078282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-23-000069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非人灵长类动物(NHPs)中使用胸廓测量法来计算呼吸分量,并确定按目标剂量投放气雾剂所需的暴露时间。麻醉药物会影响呼吸参数,如对气雾剂剂量至关重要的稳态分钟量(SSMV)。阿法沙龙-咪达唑仑混合物(AM)为犬猕猴的胸透提供了出色的参数。使用阿法沙酮的一个障碍是通过肌肉注射进行麻醉所需的剂量。一种浓度更高的阿法沙酮制剂将减少注射量并改进 AM 方案。本研究的目的是比较使用指数化 10 毫克/毫升(AM10)制剂和研究性 40 毫克/毫升(AM40)制剂进行肌肉注射的猕猴在接受胸透检查时的麻醉效果。我们假设 AM10 和 AM40 在麻醉质量 (QA)、麻醉持续时间、SSMV、累积分钟量 (AMV) 和副作用方面没有差异。我们还假设,与使用这两种配方的雄性猕猴相比,雌性猕猴的麻醉持续时间更长。这项研究使用了 15 只猕猴,其中 8 只为雌性,7 只为雄性。在间隔不少于一周的两次独立和随机麻醉事件中对 NHP 进行了比较。每只动物都作为自己的对照组,并通过随机数生成对动物进行随机分组。将麻醉后的 NHP 放入密封的胸透室中,每隔 10 秒计算一次分钟体积,以确定 SSMV。20 分钟达到 SSMV 后,试验结束。在麻醉持续时间、SSMV、AMV、副作用或质量保证方面,AM10 和 AM40 之间没有明显的统计学差异。AM40 的注射量明显较小。女性使用两种阿伐沙龙制剂的中位麻醉持续时间都没有明显延长。总体而言,AM40 比 AM10 对绒毛膜促性腺激素猕猴的麻醉更人道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Two Different Alfaxalone Concentrations Combined with Midazolam to Anesthetize Cynomolgus Macaques (Macaca fascicularis) for Plethysmography.

Plethysmography is employed in nonhuman primates (NHPs) to calculate respiratory minute volume and determine the exposure time required to deliver an aerosol at the target dose. Anesthetic drugs can impact breathing parameters like steady-state minute volume (SSMV) central to aerosol dosing. Alfaxalone-midazolam mixtures (AM) provide superior parameters for plethysmography in cynomolgus macaques. An obstacle to the use of AM is the volume required to anesthetize via intramuscular injection. A more concentrated formulation of alfaxalone will reduce injection volumes and refine AM protocols. The purpose of this study was to compare AM using the Indexed 10-mg/mL (AM10) formulation compared with an investigational 40-mg/mL (AM40) formulation for IM administration in cynomolgus macaques undergoing plethysmography. We hypothesized that AM10 and AM40 would show no difference in quality of anesthesia (QA), duration of anesthesia, SSMV, accumulated minute volume (AMV), and side effects. We also hypothesized that female macaques would have a longer duration of anesthesia compared with males using both formulations. The study used 15 cynomolgus macaques comprised of 8 females and 7 males. NHPs were compared between 2 separate and randomized anesthetic events no less than one week apart. Each animal served as its own control and animals were randomized by random number generation. Anesthetized NHPs were placed in a sealed plethysmography chamber, and minute volume measurements were calculated every 10 s to determine SSMV. Once SSMV was achieved for 20 min, the trial ended. There were no statistically significant differences between AM10 and AM40 for duration of anesthesia, SSMV, AMV, side effects, or QA. AM40 had a significantly smaller injection volume. Females did not show a significantly longer median duration of anesthesia using either of the alfaxalone formulations. Overall, AM40 offers a more humane anesthetic than AM10 for plethysmography in cynomolgus macaques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AALAS Journal Updates for Authors. Chlamydia muridarum Causes Persistent Subclinical Infection and Elicits Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, and J:ARC(S) Mice Following Exposure to Shedding Mice. The Final Scene. Investigating the Effect of Enterally Administered Capromorelin on Body Weight in Mice (Mus musculus). Comparison of Terminal Elbow Extension between Humans and Baboons (Papio anubis).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1