美沙酮在心脏手术术后疼痛管理中的作用

Jordan N. Edwards , Madeline A. Whitney , Bradford B. Smith , Megan K. Fah , Skye A. Buckner Petty , Omar Durra , Kristen A. Sell-Dottin , Erica Portner , Erica D. Wittwer , Adam J. Milam
{"title":"美沙酮在心脏手术术后疼痛管理中的作用","authors":"Jordan N. Edwards ,&nbsp;Madeline A. Whitney ,&nbsp;Bradford B. Smith ,&nbsp;Megan K. Fah ,&nbsp;Skye A. Buckner Petty ,&nbsp;Omar Durra ,&nbsp;Kristen A. Sell-Dottin ,&nbsp;Erica Portner ,&nbsp;Erica D. Wittwer ,&nbsp;Adam J. Milam","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraoperative methadone compared with short-acting opioids.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (<em>n</em>=11 967) from 2018 to 2023 from a single health system were categorised into groups based on intraoperative opioid administration: no methadone (Group O), methadone plus other opioids (Group M+O), and methadone only (Group M).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients in Groups M and M+O had lower mean pain scores until postoperative day (POD) 7 compared with Group O after adjusting for covariates (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01). Both Groups M and M+O had lower total opioid administered compared with Group O for all days POD0–POD6 (all <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The median number of hours until initial postoperative opioid after surgery was 2.55 (inter-quartile range [IQR]=1.07–5.12), 6.82 (IQR=3.52–12.98), and 7.0 (IQR=3.82–12.95) for Group O, Group M+O, and Group M, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intraoperative administration of methadone was associated with better pain control without significant side-effects after cardiac surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000145/pdfft?md5=e5a3c7b90cf6b2662d8e8bf8dfa852d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000145-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of methadone in cardiac surgery for management of postoperative pain\",\"authors\":\"Jordan N. Edwards ,&nbsp;Madeline A. Whitney ,&nbsp;Bradford B. Smith ,&nbsp;Megan K. Fah ,&nbsp;Skye A. Buckner Petty ,&nbsp;Omar Durra ,&nbsp;Kristen A. Sell-Dottin ,&nbsp;Erica Portner ,&nbsp;Erica D. Wittwer ,&nbsp;Adam J. Milam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraoperative methadone compared with short-acting opioids.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (<em>n</em>=11 967) from 2018 to 2023 from a single health system were categorised into groups based on intraoperative opioid administration: no methadone (Group O), methadone plus other opioids (Group M+O), and methadone only (Group M).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients in Groups M and M+O had lower mean pain scores until postoperative day (POD) 7 compared with Group O after adjusting for covariates (<em>P</em>&lt;0.01). Both Groups M and M+O had lower total opioid administered compared with Group O for all days POD0–POD6 (all <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). The median number of hours until initial postoperative opioid after surgery was 2.55 (inter-quartile range [IQR]=1.07–5.12), 6.82 (IQR=3.52–12.98), and 7.0 (IQR=3.82–12.95) for Group O, Group M+O, and Group M, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intraoperative administration of methadone was associated with better pain control without significant side-effects after cardiac surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJA open\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000145/pdfft?md5=e5a3c7b90cf6b2662d8e8bf8dfa852d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000145-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJA open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项回顾性研究评估了术中美沙酮与短效阿片类药物相比的疗效和安全性。方法将2018年至2023年在单一医疗系统接受心肺旁路心脏手术的患者(n=11 967)根据术中阿片类药物给药情况分为几组:无美沙酮组(O组)、美沙酮加其他阿片类药物组(M+O组)和仅有美沙酮组(M组)。结果经协变因素调整后,M 组和 M+O 组患者在术后第 7 天前的平均疼痛评分低于 O 组(P<0.01)。与 O 组相比,M 组和 M+O 组在 POD0-POD6 各天的阿片类药物总用量均较低(均为 P<0.001)。O组、M+O组和M组术后首次使用阿片类药物前的中位小时数分别为2.55(四分位数间距[IQR]=1.07-5.12)、6.82(IQR=3.52-12.98)和7.0(IQR=3.82-12.95)。术后并发症的发生率在各组间无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of methadone in cardiac surgery for management of postoperative pain

Background

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraoperative methadone compared with short-acting opioids.

Methods

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (n=11 967) from 2018 to 2023 from a single health system were categorised into groups based on intraoperative opioid administration: no methadone (Group O), methadone plus other opioids (Group M+O), and methadone only (Group M).

Results

Patients in Groups M and M+O had lower mean pain scores until postoperative day (POD) 7 compared with Group O after adjusting for covariates (P<0.01). Both Groups M and M+O had lower total opioid administered compared with Group O for all days POD0–POD6 (all P<0.001). The median number of hours until initial postoperative opioid after surgery was 2.55 (inter-quartile range [IQR]=1.07–5.12), 6.82 (IQR=3.52–12.98), and 7.0 (IQR=3.82–12.95) for Group O, Group M+O, and Group M, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

Intraoperative administration of methadone was associated with better pain control without significant side-effects after cardiac surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Xenon anaesthesia is associated with a reduction in frontal electroencephalogram peak alpha frequency Moderate or severe pain in recovery after major elective surgery: A pilot retrospective analysis to identify those at risk Association between plasma-free haemoglobin and postoperative acute kidney injury in paediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study Oxygen insufflation via the working channel during tracheal intubation guided by a flexible optical scope and benefits, dangers, and future of the method: a narrative review Incidence and trajectories of subclinical and KDIGO-defined postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1