[奥地利、德国和瑞士护理学士课程中的循证实践:一般条件、教学内容和方法调查]。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.006
Peter Jäger , Julian Hirt , Thomas Nordhausen , Janine Vetsch , Katrin Balzer , Martin N. Dichter , Gerhard Müller , Angelika Schley , Stefanie Neyer
{"title":"[奥地利、德国和瑞士护理学士课程中的循证实践:一般条件、教学内容和方法调查]。","authors":"Peter Jäger ,&nbsp;Julian Hirt ,&nbsp;Thomas Nordhausen ,&nbsp;Janine Vetsch ,&nbsp;Katrin Balzer ,&nbsp;Martin N. Dichter ,&nbsp;Gerhard Müller ,&nbsp;Angelika Schley ,&nbsp;Stefanie Neyer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Aim</h3><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides an important basis for improving both the quality of care and patient safety. Formulating a research question, searching the literature, and critical appraisal are crucial to developing evidence-based practice. The aim of this survey was to provide an overview of how these topics are integrated into bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany, and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. We also aimed to show how teachers implement these subjects and how they experience and assess the implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online survey sent out to program directors and teaching staff of all 58 bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. For data collection, a questionnaire was developed containing items on general teaching conditions, contents, and methods of evidence-based nursing practice, as well as on the estimated thematic interest of students. The data were analysed descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The program directors returned 24 questionnaires (41<!--> <!-->%). Of 75 questionnaires forwarded to the faculty, 17 (23<!--> <!-->%) were received from nine programs. On average, 5.6 teaching units (SD 2.6) are used for formulating a research question, 10 teaching units (SD 4.1) for literature review, and 11.3 teaching units (SD 6.9) for critical appraisal. Half of the teaching staff indicated that linkages between education and nursing care practice have been established. The traditional teaching method of frontal teaching is used predominantly. Student interest in topics was rated as moderate by most teachers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Topics on evidence-based practice are an integral part of bachelor's degree programs in nursing in German-speaking countries. An increase in teaching units, active learning methods and the growing interconnection between education and practice could improve the acquisition of competencies and attitudes of students regarding EBP and further advance its implementation in practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000102/pdfft?md5=d4ed8e3f3f14b16ebbdafbadc482e037&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000102-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidenzbasierte Praxis in Bachelor-Pflegestudiengängen in Österreich, Deutschland und der Schweiz: ein Survey zu Rahmenbedingungen, Lehrinhalten und -methoden\",\"authors\":\"Peter Jäger ,&nbsp;Julian Hirt ,&nbsp;Thomas Nordhausen ,&nbsp;Janine Vetsch ,&nbsp;Katrin Balzer ,&nbsp;Martin N. Dichter ,&nbsp;Gerhard Müller ,&nbsp;Angelika Schley ,&nbsp;Stefanie Neyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background/Aim</h3><p>Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides an important basis for improving both the quality of care and patient safety. Formulating a research question, searching the literature, and critical appraisal are crucial to developing evidence-based practice. The aim of this survey was to provide an overview of how these topics are integrated into bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany, and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. We also aimed to show how teachers implement these subjects and how they experience and assess the implementation.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online survey sent out to program directors and teaching staff of all 58 bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. For data collection, a questionnaire was developed containing items on general teaching conditions, contents, and methods of evidence-based nursing practice, as well as on the estimated thematic interest of students. The data were analysed descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The program directors returned 24 questionnaires (41<!--> <!-->%). Of 75 questionnaires forwarded to the faculty, 17 (23<!--> <!-->%) were received from nine programs. On average, 5.6 teaching units (SD 2.6) are used for formulating a research question, 10 teaching units (SD 4.1) for literature review, and 11.3 teaching units (SD 6.9) for critical appraisal. Half of the teaching staff indicated that linkages between education and nursing care practice have been established. The traditional teaching method of frontal teaching is used predominantly. Student interest in topics was rated as moderate by most teachers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Topics on evidence-based practice are an integral part of bachelor's degree programs in nursing in German-speaking countries. An increase in teaching units, active learning methods and the growing interconnection between education and practice could improve the acquisition of competencies and attitudes of students regarding EBP and further advance its implementation in practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000102/pdfft?md5=d4ed8e3f3f14b16ebbdafbadc482e037&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000102-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000102\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000102","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:循证实践(EBP)是提高医疗质量和患者安全的重要基础。提出研究问题、搜索文献和进行批判性评估是发展循证实践的关键。本次调查旨在概述奥地利、德国和瑞士德语区如何将这些主题纳入护理学学士学位课程。我们还希望了解教师是如何实施这些科目的,以及他们是如何体验和评估实施情况的:我们进行了一项探索性横断面研究,向奥地利、德国和瑞士德语区所有 58 个护理学学士学位课程的课程主任和教学人员发送了一份在线调查问卷。为收集数据,我们编制了一份调查问卷,其中包括循证护理实践的一般教学条件、内容和方法,以及学生的估计专题兴趣等项目。对数据进行了描述性分析:结果:课程主任收回了 24 份问卷(41%)。在转发给教师的 75 份问卷中,9 个专业共收回 17 份(23%)。平均而言,5.6 个教学单元(标准差为 2.6)用于提出研究问题,10 个教学单元(标准差为 4.1)用于文献综述,11.3 个教学单元(标准差为 6.9)用于批判性评价。半数教学人员表示已建立教育与护理实践之间的联系。主要采用正面教学的传统教学方法。大多数教师将学生对课题的兴趣评为中等:结论:在德语国家,循证实践专题是护理学学士学位课程的组成部分。教学单元的增加、积极的学习方法以及教育与实践之间日益紧密的联系,可以提高学生对循证实践的能力和态度,并进一步推动其在实践中的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evidenzbasierte Praxis in Bachelor-Pflegestudiengängen in Österreich, Deutschland und der Schweiz: ein Survey zu Rahmenbedingungen, Lehrinhalten und -methoden

Background/Aim

Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides an important basis for improving both the quality of care and patient safety. Formulating a research question, searching the literature, and critical appraisal are crucial to developing evidence-based practice. The aim of this survey was to provide an overview of how these topics are integrated into bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany, and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. We also aimed to show how teachers implement these subjects and how they experience and assess the implementation.

Method

We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online survey sent out to program directors and teaching staff of all 58 bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. For data collection, a questionnaire was developed containing items on general teaching conditions, contents, and methods of evidence-based nursing practice, as well as on the estimated thematic interest of students. The data were analysed descriptively.

Results

The program directors returned 24 questionnaires (41 %). Of 75 questionnaires forwarded to the faculty, 17 (23 %) were received from nine programs. On average, 5.6 teaching units (SD 2.6) are used for formulating a research question, 10 teaching units (SD 4.1) for literature review, and 11.3 teaching units (SD 6.9) for critical appraisal. Half of the teaching staff indicated that linkages between education and nursing care practice have been established. The traditional teaching method of frontal teaching is used predominantly. Student interest in topics was rated as moderate by most teachers.

Conclusions

Topics on evidence-based practice are an integral part of bachelor's degree programs in nursing in German-speaking countries. An increase in teaching units, active learning methods and the growing interconnection between education and practice could improve the acquisition of competencies and attitudes of students regarding EBP and further advance its implementation in practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1