埃塞俄比亚土壤有机碳的预测、绘图及其对改善土壤有机碳管理的影响

Gizachew Ayalew Tiruneh, Ashok Hanjagi, Muhammad Mumtaz, José Miguel Reichert
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚土壤有机碳的预测、绘图及其对改善土壤有机碳管理的影响","authors":"Gizachew Ayalew Tiruneh,&nbsp;Ashok Hanjagi,&nbsp;Muhammad Mumtaz,&nbsp;José Miguel Reichert","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A precise soil organic carbon (SOC) content estimate is crucial soil quality parameter for agricultural produce and ecological safety. Moreover, geospatial modeling of SOC is critical when there are limited laboratory equipment and chemical reagents for soil analysis. This study used geostatistics—ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting (IDW)—to map SOC in Libokemkem area, Northwest Ethiopia, for improved SOC management. About 107 soil samples were obtained from the plow layer at a 20-cm depth and SOC was determined. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24.0 was used to generate descriptive statistics, and geostatistical analysis was also performed on the data using ArcGIS platform. The coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) and root mean square error (RMSE) derived from the validation of the predicted maps were used to assess the models. The results revealed homogeneity (coefficient of variation &lt; 10%), low (0.12%–1.74%), and optimal (1.74%–4.06%) mean levels of SOC in study area. The OK showed an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.74 and an RMSE of 13%, and the IDW revealed an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.69 and an RMSE of 14%. The semivariogram results indicate a moderate dependence for SOC with stable, circular, spherical, exponential, and Gaussian models. We conclude that the sustainable monitoring of SOC is significant in enhancing soil quality. However, further study considering all drivers of spatial variability for SOC in the study and other soil sampling approaches improving performance of the prediction models is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction, mapping, and implication for better soil organic carbon management in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Gizachew Ayalew Tiruneh,&nbsp;Ashok Hanjagi,&nbsp;Muhammad Mumtaz,&nbsp;José Miguel Reichert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A precise soil organic carbon (SOC) content estimate is crucial soil quality parameter for agricultural produce and ecological safety. Moreover, geospatial modeling of SOC is critical when there are limited laboratory equipment and chemical reagents for soil analysis. This study used geostatistics—ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting (IDW)—to map SOC in Libokemkem area, Northwest Ethiopia, for improved SOC management. About 107 soil samples were obtained from the plow layer at a 20-cm depth and SOC was determined. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24.0 was used to generate descriptive statistics, and geostatistical analysis was also performed on the data using ArcGIS platform. The coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) and root mean square error (RMSE) derived from the validation of the predicted maps were used to assess the models. The results revealed homogeneity (coefficient of variation &lt; 10%), low (0.12%–1.74%), and optimal (1.74%–4.06%) mean levels of SOC in study area. The OK showed an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.74 and an RMSE of 13%, and the IDW revealed an <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.69 and an RMSE of 14%. The semivariogram results indicate a moderate dependence for SOC with stable, circular, spherical, exponential, and Gaussian models. We conclude that the sustainable monitoring of SOC is significant in enhancing soil quality. However, further study considering all drivers of spatial variability for SOC in the study and other soil sampling approaches improving performance of the prediction models is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤有机碳(SOC)含量的精确估算是农产品和生态安全的关键土壤质量参数。此外,在实验室设备和土壤分析化学试剂有限的情况下,SOC 的地理空间建模至关重要。本研究采用地质统计学方法--普通克里金法(OK)和反距离加权法(IDW)--绘制埃塞俄比亚西北部 Libokemkem 地区的 SOC 图,以改善 SOC 管理。从 20 厘米深的耕作层采集了约 107 个土壤样本,并测定了 SOC。使用社会科学统计软件包 24.0 版生成描述性统计数据,并使用 ArcGIS 平台对数据进行了地理统计分析。使用预测地图验证得出的判定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)来评估模型。结果显示,研究区域的 SOC 平均水平存在同质性(变异系数为 10%)、低水平(0.12%-1.74%)和最佳水平(1.74%-4.06%)。OK显示的R2为0.74,均方根误差为13%;IDW显示的R2为0.69,均方根误差为14%。半变量图结果表明,SOC 与稳定模型、圆形模型、球形模型、指数模型和高斯模型之间存在中等程度的依赖关系。我们的结论是,对 SOC 进行可持续监测对提高土壤质量具有重要意义。不过,还需要进一步研究,考虑研究中 SOC 空间变异性的所有驱动因素,以及其他提高预测模型性能的土壤采样方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction, mapping, and implication for better soil organic carbon management in Ethiopia

A precise soil organic carbon (SOC) content estimate is crucial soil quality parameter for agricultural produce and ecological safety. Moreover, geospatial modeling of SOC is critical when there are limited laboratory equipment and chemical reagents for soil analysis. This study used geostatistics—ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighting (IDW)—to map SOC in Libokemkem area, Northwest Ethiopia, for improved SOC management. About 107 soil samples were obtained from the plow layer at a 20-cm depth and SOC was determined. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24.0 was used to generate descriptive statistics, and geostatistical analysis was also performed on the data using ArcGIS platform. The coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) derived from the validation of the predicted maps were used to assess the models. The results revealed homogeneity (coefficient of variation < 10%), low (0.12%–1.74%), and optimal (1.74%–4.06%) mean levels of SOC in study area. The OK showed an R2 of 0.74 and an RMSE of 13%, and the IDW revealed an R2 of 0.69 and an RMSE of 14%. The semivariogram results indicate a moderate dependence for SOC with stable, circular, spherical, exponential, and Gaussian models. We conclude that the sustainable monitoring of SOC is significant in enhancing soil quality. However, further study considering all drivers of spatial variability for SOC in the study and other soil sampling approaches improving performance of the prediction models is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Proceedings of the 14th North American Forest Soils Conference Soil chemical properties affecting grain yield and oil content of crambe biofuel crop Particulate organic carbon and nitrogen and soil-test biological activity under grazed pastures and conservation land uses Determining microbial metabolic limitation under the influence of moss patch size from soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1