Estefanía Oyharçabal, Fernanda Covacevich, Ingrid Bain, Claudina Soledad Acuña, Germán Darío Berone
{"title":"牛干粪施肥可提高草-豆混合物的牧草产量,同时保持豆科植物的比例和根相关微生物区系","authors":"Estefanía Oyharçabal, Fernanda Covacevich, Ingrid Bain, Claudina Soledad Acuña, Germán Darío Berone","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to find ways to improve the forage yield of grass-legume mixtures without compromising soil biodiversity. In Argentinean Patagonia, the effects of applying cattle dry manure (M) and urea (U) (0, 60, 120, or 240 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) were assessed on herbage production of irrigated fescue-lotus mixtures, as well as on the activity/abundance of autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and N-fixing rhizobium bacteria. We hypothesised that manure has advantages over urea in increasing forage yields while maintaining the proportion of legumes and root-associated microbiota. The 120 U, 240 U, and 240 M resulted in the greatest forage production; however, yield varied depending on the source applied. The high productivity of the 120 U and 240 U was probably due to the fast grass growth immediately after fertilization, which resulted in a depressed growth of the legume. The high yield of the swards fertilized with 240 M was probably due to slight and delayed growth of grass without legume yield decline. The highest radiation interception was found in swards with a low legume proportion, suggesting a light competition from grass fertilized with the highest urea doses, which were also consistent with the highest <i>N</i> and <i>P</i> nutritional status. The microbial activity/abundance were not affected by fertilization, but the final number of nodules was positively associated with the legume proportion. In conclusion, manure fertilization increased forage yield of the mixtures, while preserving the legume proportion and the root-associated microbiota. Our findings aid in reducing synthetic-N fertilizers applied in pasture-based livestock systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cattle dry manure fertilization increases forage yield of grass-legume mixtures, while maintaining the legume proportion and root-associated microbiota\",\"authors\":\"Estefanía Oyharçabal, Fernanda Covacevich, Ingrid Bain, Claudina Soledad Acuña, Germán Darío Berone\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was to find ways to improve the forage yield of grass-legume mixtures without compromising soil biodiversity. In Argentinean Patagonia, the effects of applying cattle dry manure (M) and urea (U) (0, 60, 120, or 240 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) were assessed on herbage production of irrigated fescue-lotus mixtures, as well as on the activity/abundance of autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and N-fixing rhizobium bacteria. We hypothesised that manure has advantages over urea in increasing forage yields while maintaining the proportion of legumes and root-associated microbiota. The 120 U, 240 U, and 240 M resulted in the greatest forage production; however, yield varied depending on the source applied. The high productivity of the 120 U and 240 U was probably due to the fast grass growth immediately after fertilization, which resulted in a depressed growth of the legume. The high yield of the swards fertilized with 240 M was probably due to slight and delayed growth of grass without legume yield decline. The highest radiation interception was found in swards with a low legume proportion, suggesting a light competition from grass fertilized with the highest urea doses, which were also consistent with the highest <i>N</i> and <i>P</i> nutritional status. The microbial activity/abundance were not affected by fertilization, but the final number of nodules was positively associated with the legume proportion. In conclusion, manure fertilization increased forage yield of the mixtures, while preserving the legume proportion and the root-associated microbiota. Our findings aid in reducing synthetic-N fertilizers applied in pasture-based livestock systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12656\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12656","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究的目的是找到在不损害土壤生物多样性的情况下提高草-豆混合物牧草产量的方法。在阿根廷巴塔哥尼亚,我们评估了施用牛干粪(M)和尿素(U)(0、60、120 或 240 千克氮/公顷/年)对灌溉羊茅-莲花混合物牧草产量的影响,以及对自生枝状菌根真菌和固氮根瘤菌活性/丰度的影响。我们假设,粪肥比尿素更能提高牧草产量,同时保持豆科植物和根相关微生物群的比例。120 U、240 U 和 240 M 的牧草产量最高,但产量因施用的来源而异。120 U 和 240 U 的高产可能是由于施肥后禾本科植物生长迅速,导致豆科植物生长缓慢。施用 240 M 肥料的草地产量高,可能是由于禾本科植物略微延迟生长,而豆科植物产量没有下降。豆科植物比例低的草地辐射截获率最高,这表明施用最高剂量尿素的草地存在光竞争,这也与最高的氮和磷营养状况相一致。微生物活性/丰度不受施肥影响,但最终的结核数量与豆科植物比例呈正相关。总之,施肥提高了混合物的饲料产量,同时保留了豆科植物比例和根相关微生物群。我们的研究结果有助于减少以牧场为基础的畜牧系统中合成氮肥的施用量。
Cattle dry manure fertilization increases forage yield of grass-legume mixtures, while maintaining the legume proportion and root-associated microbiota
The aim of this study was to find ways to improve the forage yield of grass-legume mixtures without compromising soil biodiversity. In Argentinean Patagonia, the effects of applying cattle dry manure (M) and urea (U) (0, 60, 120, or 240 kg N ha−1 year−1) were assessed on herbage production of irrigated fescue-lotus mixtures, as well as on the activity/abundance of autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and N-fixing rhizobium bacteria. We hypothesised that manure has advantages over urea in increasing forage yields while maintaining the proportion of legumes and root-associated microbiota. The 120 U, 240 U, and 240 M resulted in the greatest forage production; however, yield varied depending on the source applied. The high productivity of the 120 U and 240 U was probably due to the fast grass growth immediately after fertilization, which resulted in a depressed growth of the legume. The high yield of the swards fertilized with 240 M was probably due to slight and delayed growth of grass without legume yield decline. The highest radiation interception was found in swards with a low legume proportion, suggesting a light competition from grass fertilized with the highest urea doses, which were also consistent with the highest N and P nutritional status. The microbial activity/abundance were not affected by fertilization, but the final number of nodules was positively associated with the legume proportion. In conclusion, manure fertilization increased forage yield of the mixtures, while preserving the legume proportion and the root-associated microbiota. Our findings aid in reducing synthetic-N fertilizers applied in pasture-based livestock systems.
期刊介绍:
Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.