Ashleigh R Tuite, Alison E Simmons, Monica Rudd, Alexandra Cernat, Gebremedhin B Gebretekle, Man Wah Yeung, April Killikelly, Winnie Siu, Sarah A Buchan, Nicholas Brousseau, Matthew Tunis
{"title":"加拿大老年人呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗接种策略:成本效用分析","authors":"Ashleigh R Tuite, Alison E Simmons, Monica Rudd, Alexandra Cernat, Gebremedhin B Gebretekle, Man Wah Yeung, April Killikelly, Winnie Siu, Sarah A Buchan, Nicholas Brousseau, Matthew Tunis","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.20.24304630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have the potential to reduce disease burden and costs in Canadians, but the cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination programs for older adults is unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of different adult age cutoffs for RSV vaccination programs, with or without a focus on people with higher disease risk due to chronic medical conditions (CMCs). Methods: We developed a static individual-based model of medically-attended RSV disease to evaluate the cost-utility of alternate age-, medical risk-, and age- plus medical risk-based vaccination policies. The model followed a multi-age cohort of 100,000 people aged 50 years and older over a three-year period. Vaccine characteristics were based on RSV vaccines authorized in Canada as of March 2024. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjust life year (QALY) from the health system and societal perspectives, discounted at 1.5%. Results: Although all vaccination strategies averted medically-attended RSV disease, strategies focused on adults with CMCs were more likely to be cost-effective than age-based strategies. A program focused on vaccinating adults aged 70 years and older with one or more CMCs was optimal for a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Results were sensitive to assumptions about vaccine price, but approaches based on medical risk remained optimal compared to age-based strategies even when vaccine prices were low. Findings were robust to a range of alternate assumptions. Interpretation: Based on available data, RSV vaccination programs in some groups of older Canadians with underlying medical conditions are expected to be cost-effective.","PeriodicalId":501072,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Economics","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination strategies for older Canadian adults: a cost-utility analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ashleigh R Tuite, Alison E Simmons, Monica Rudd, Alexandra Cernat, Gebremedhin B Gebretekle, Man Wah Yeung, April Killikelly, Winnie Siu, Sarah A Buchan, Nicholas Brousseau, Matthew Tunis\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.03.20.24304630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have the potential to reduce disease burden and costs in Canadians, but the cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination programs for older adults is unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of different adult age cutoffs for RSV vaccination programs, with or without a focus on people with higher disease risk due to chronic medical conditions (CMCs). Methods: We developed a static individual-based model of medically-attended RSV disease to evaluate the cost-utility of alternate age-, medical risk-, and age- plus medical risk-based vaccination policies. The model followed a multi-age cohort of 100,000 people aged 50 years and older over a three-year period. Vaccine characteristics were based on RSV vaccines authorized in Canada as of March 2024. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjust life year (QALY) from the health system and societal perspectives, discounted at 1.5%. Results: Although all vaccination strategies averted medically-attended RSV disease, strategies focused on adults with CMCs were more likely to be cost-effective than age-based strategies. A program focused on vaccinating adults aged 70 years and older with one or more CMCs was optimal for a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Results were sensitive to assumptions about vaccine price, but approaches based on medical risk remained optimal compared to age-based strategies even when vaccine prices were low. Findings were robust to a range of alternate assumptions. Interpretation: Based on available data, RSV vaccination programs in some groups of older Canadians with underlying medical conditions are expected to be cost-effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.20.24304630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.20.24304630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respiratory syncytial virus vaccination strategies for older Canadian adults: a cost-utility analysis
Background: Vaccines against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) have the potential to reduce disease burden and costs in Canadians, but the cost-effectiveness of RSV vaccination programs for older adults is unknown. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of different adult age cutoffs for RSV vaccination programs, with or without a focus on people with higher disease risk due to chronic medical conditions (CMCs). Methods: We developed a static individual-based model of medically-attended RSV disease to evaluate the cost-utility of alternate age-, medical risk-, and age- plus medical risk-based vaccination policies. The model followed a multi-age cohort of 100,000 people aged 50 years and older over a three-year period. Vaccine characteristics were based on RSV vaccines authorized in Canada as of March 2024. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjust life year (QALY) from the health system and societal perspectives, discounted at 1.5%. Results: Although all vaccination strategies averted medically-attended RSV disease, strategies focused on adults with CMCs were more likely to be cost-effective than age-based strategies. A program focused on vaccinating adults aged 70 years and older with one or more CMCs was optimal for a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY. Results were sensitive to assumptions about vaccine price, but approaches based on medical risk remained optimal compared to age-based strategies even when vaccine prices were low. Findings were robust to a range of alternate assumptions. Interpretation: Based on available data, RSV vaccination programs in some groups of older Canadians with underlying medical conditions are expected to be cost-effective.