镰状细胞病的急性疼痛危机:如何改善治疗效果?

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Reviews Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.blre.2024.101194
Paul Telfer , Kofi A. Anie , Stella Kotsiopoulou , Laura Aiken , Stephen Hibbs , Carol Burt , Sara Stuart-Smith , Sanne Lugthart
{"title":"镰状细胞病的急性疼痛危机:如何改善治疗效果?","authors":"Paul Telfer ,&nbsp;Kofi A. Anie ,&nbsp;Stella Kotsiopoulou ,&nbsp;Laura Aiken ,&nbsp;Stephen Hibbs ,&nbsp;Carol Burt ,&nbsp;Sara Stuart-Smith ,&nbsp;Sanne Lugthart","doi":"10.1016/j.blre.2024.101194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The acute pain crisis (APC) is the commonest complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Severe episodes may require treatment in hospital with strong opioid analgesic drugs, combined with additional supportive care measures. Guidelines for APC management have been produced over the past two decades gathering evidence from published studies, expert opinion, and patient perspective. Unfortunately, reports from multiple sources indicate that guidelines are often not followed, and that acute care in emergency departments and on acute medical wards is suboptimal. It is important to understand what leads to this breakdown in health care, and to identify evidence-based interventions which could be implemented to improve care. This review focuses on recently published articles as well as information about on-going clinical trials.</p><p>Aspects of care which could potentially make a difference to patient experience include availability and accessibility of individual care plans agreed between patient and treating specialist, innovative means of delivering initial opioids to reduce time to first analgesia, and availability of a specialist unit away from the ED, where expert care can be delivered in a more compassionate environment. The current evidence of improved outcomes and health economic advantage with these interventions is inadequate, and this is hampering their implementation into health care systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56139,"journal":{"name":"Blood Reviews","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101194"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X24000274/pdfft?md5=4070d20bca5aa0b21ad22d1a14545d58&pid=1-s2.0-S0268960X24000274-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The acute pain crisis in sickle cell disease: What can be done to improve outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Paul Telfer ,&nbsp;Kofi A. Anie ,&nbsp;Stella Kotsiopoulou ,&nbsp;Laura Aiken ,&nbsp;Stephen Hibbs ,&nbsp;Carol Burt ,&nbsp;Sara Stuart-Smith ,&nbsp;Sanne Lugthart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.blre.2024.101194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The acute pain crisis (APC) is the commonest complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Severe episodes may require treatment in hospital with strong opioid analgesic drugs, combined with additional supportive care measures. Guidelines for APC management have been produced over the past two decades gathering evidence from published studies, expert opinion, and patient perspective. Unfortunately, reports from multiple sources indicate that guidelines are often not followed, and that acute care in emergency departments and on acute medical wards is suboptimal. It is important to understand what leads to this breakdown in health care, and to identify evidence-based interventions which could be implemented to improve care. This review focuses on recently published articles as well as information about on-going clinical trials.</p><p>Aspects of care which could potentially make a difference to patient experience include availability and accessibility of individual care plans agreed between patient and treating specialist, innovative means of delivering initial opioids to reduce time to first analgesia, and availability of a specialist unit away from the ED, where expert care can be delivered in a more compassionate environment. The current evidence of improved outcomes and health economic advantage with these interventions is inadequate, and this is hampering their implementation into health care systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X24000274/pdfft?md5=4070d20bca5aa0b21ad22d1a14545d58&pid=1-s2.0-S0268960X24000274-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X24000274\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X24000274","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性疼痛危象(APC)是镰状细胞病(SCD)最常见的并发症。严重发作时可能需要住院治疗,使用强效阿片类镇痛药物,并结合额外的支持性护理措施。在过去的二十年里,从已发表的研究报告、专家意见和患者观点中收集证据,制定了 APC 治疗指南。遗憾的是,来自多方面的报告显示,指导原则往往没有得到遵守,急诊科和急诊病房的急性护理效果并不理想。重要的是要了解是什么导致了这种医疗护理的崩溃,并找出可以实施的循证干预措施来改善护理。本综述侧重于近期发表的文章以及正在进行的临床试验的相关信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The acute pain crisis in sickle cell disease: What can be done to improve outcomes?

The acute pain crisis (APC) is the commonest complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). Severe episodes may require treatment in hospital with strong opioid analgesic drugs, combined with additional supportive care measures. Guidelines for APC management have been produced over the past two decades gathering evidence from published studies, expert opinion, and patient perspective. Unfortunately, reports from multiple sources indicate that guidelines are often not followed, and that acute care in emergency departments and on acute medical wards is suboptimal. It is important to understand what leads to this breakdown in health care, and to identify evidence-based interventions which could be implemented to improve care. This review focuses on recently published articles as well as information about on-going clinical trials.

Aspects of care which could potentially make a difference to patient experience include availability and accessibility of individual care plans agreed between patient and treating specialist, innovative means of delivering initial opioids to reduce time to first analgesia, and availability of a specialist unit away from the ED, where expert care can be delivered in a more compassionate environment. The current evidence of improved outcomes and health economic advantage with these interventions is inadequate, and this is hampering their implementation into health care systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Reviews
Blood Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
1.40%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Blood Reviews, a highly regarded international journal, serves as a vital information hub, offering comprehensive evaluations of clinical practices and research insights from esteemed experts. Specially commissioned, peer-reviewed articles authored by leading researchers and practitioners ensure extensive global coverage across all sub-specialties of hematology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Breaking down frailty: Assessing vulnerability in acute myeloid leukemia Longitudinal clinical manifestations of Fanconi anemia: A systematized review Absolute and functional iron deficiency: Biomarkers, impact on immune system, and therapy Measurable residual disease (MRD)-testing in haematological cancers: A giant leap forward or sideways?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1