静息态脑电图微状态分析和基于机器学习的癫痫分类器模型

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI:10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z
Asha SA, Sudalaimani C, Devanand P, Subodh PS, Arya ML, Devika Kumar, Sanjeev V Thomas, Ramshekhar N Menon
{"title":"静息态脑电图微状态分析和基于机器学习的癫痫分类器模型","authors":"Asha SA, Sudalaimani C, Devanand P, Subodh PS, Arya ML, Devika Kumar, Sanjeev V Thomas, Ramshekhar N Menon","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electroencephalography-based (EEG) microstate analysis is a promising and widely studied method in which spontaneous cerebral activity is segmented into sub second level quasi-stable states and analyzed. Currently it is being widely explored due to increasing evidence of the association of microstates with cognitive functioning and large-scale brain networks identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our study using the four archetypal microstates (A, B, C and D), we investigated the changes in resting state EEG microstate dynamics in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) compared to healthy controls (HC). Machine learning was applied to study its feasibility in differentiating between different groups using microstate statistics. We found significant differences in all parameters related to Microstate D (fronto-parietal network) in TLE patients and Microstate B (visual processing) in IGE patients compared to HCs. Occurrence, duration and time coverage of Microstate B was highest in IGE when compared to the other groups. We also found significant deviations in transition probabilities for both epilepsy groups, particularly into Microstate C (salience network) in IGE. Classification accuracy into clinical groups was found to exceed 70% using microstate parameters which improved on incorporating neuropsychological test differences. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to compare and validate the use of microstate features to discriminate between two disparate epilepsy syndromes (TLE, IGE) and HCs using machine learning suggesting that resting state EEG microstates can be used for endophenotyping and to study resting state dysfunction in epilepsy. </p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resting state EEG microstate profiling and a machine-learning based classifier model in epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Asha SA, Sudalaimani C, Devanand P, Subodh PS, Arya ML, Devika Kumar, Sanjeev V Thomas, Ramshekhar N Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Electroencephalography-based (EEG) microstate analysis is a promising and widely studied method in which spontaneous cerebral activity is segmented into sub second level quasi-stable states and analyzed. Currently it is being widely explored due to increasing evidence of the association of microstates with cognitive functioning and large-scale brain networks identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our study using the four archetypal microstates (A, B, C and D), we investigated the changes in resting state EEG microstate dynamics in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) compared to healthy controls (HC). Machine learning was applied to study its feasibility in differentiating between different groups using microstate statistics. We found significant differences in all parameters related to Microstate D (fronto-parietal network) in TLE patients and Microstate B (visual processing) in IGE patients compared to HCs. Occurrence, duration and time coverage of Microstate B was highest in IGE when compared to the other groups. We also found significant deviations in transition probabilities for both epilepsy groups, particularly into Microstate C (salience network) in IGE. Classification accuracy into clinical groups was found to exceed 70% using microstate parameters which improved on incorporating neuropsychological test differences. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to compare and validate the use of microstate features to discriminate between two disparate epilepsy syndromes (TLE, IGE) and HCs using machine learning suggesting that resting state EEG microstates can be used for endophenotyping and to study resting state dysfunction in epilepsy. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于脑电图(EEG)的微状态分析是一种前景广阔且被广泛研究的方法,它将自发的大脑活动细分为亚二级准稳定状态并进行分析。目前,由于越来越多的证据表明微状态与认知功能和功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)确定的大规模大脑网络相关联,这种方法正在被广泛探索。在我们的研究中,我们使用四种原型微状态(A、B、C 和 D),调查了颞叶癫痫(TLE)和特发性广泛性癫痫(IGE)患者与健康对照组(HC)相比,静息状态脑电图微状态动态的变化。我们应用机器学习来研究其使用微状态统计数据区分不同群体的可行性。我们发现,与健康对照组相比,TLE 患者微状态 D(前顶叶网络)和 IGE 患者微状态 B(视觉处理)的所有相关参数都存在明显差异。与其他组别相比,IGE 患者微状态 B 的发生率、持续时间和时间覆盖率最高。我们还发现,两组癫痫患者的转换概率存在明显偏差,尤其是 IGE 患者转换到微态 C(突出网络)的概率。使用微状态参数对临床组别进行分类的准确率超过 70%,在纳入神经心理测试差异后,准确率有所提高。据我们所知,目前的研究首次比较并验证了使用微状态特征来区分两种不同的癫痫综合征(TLE、IGE)和HC的机器学习方法,这表明静息状态脑电图微状态可用于癫痫的内分型和静息状态功能障碍的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resting state EEG microstate profiling and a machine-learning based classifier model in epilepsy

Electroencephalography-based (EEG) microstate analysis is a promising and widely studied method in which spontaneous cerebral activity is segmented into sub second level quasi-stable states and analyzed. Currently it is being widely explored due to increasing evidence of the association of microstates with cognitive functioning and large-scale brain networks identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our study using the four archetypal microstates (A, B, C and D), we investigated the changes in resting state EEG microstate dynamics in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) compared to healthy controls (HC). Machine learning was applied to study its feasibility in differentiating between different groups using microstate statistics. We found significant differences in all parameters related to Microstate D (fronto-parietal network) in TLE patients and Microstate B (visual processing) in IGE patients compared to HCs. Occurrence, duration and time coverage of Microstate B was highest in IGE when compared to the other groups. We also found significant deviations in transition probabilities for both epilepsy groups, particularly into Microstate C (salience network) in IGE. Classification accuracy into clinical groups was found to exceed 70% using microstate parameters which improved on incorporating neuropsychological test differences. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to compare and validate the use of microstate features to discriminate between two disparate epilepsy syndromes (TLE, IGE) and HCs using machine learning suggesting that resting state EEG microstates can be used for endophenotyping and to study resting state dysfunction in epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
A memristor-based circuit design of avoidance learning with time delay and its application Perceptual information processing in table tennis players: based on top-down hierarchical predictive coding EEG-based deception detection using weighted dual perspective visibility graph analysis The dynamical behavior effects of different numbers of discrete memristive synaptic coupled neurons Advancements in automated diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder through deep learning and resting-state functional mri biomarkers: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1