Asha SA, Sudalaimani C, Devanand P, Subodh PS, Arya ML, Devika Kumar, Sanjeev V Thomas, Ramshekhar N Menon
{"title":"静息态脑电图微状态分析和基于机器学习的癫痫分类器模型","authors":"Asha SA, Sudalaimani C, Devanand P, Subodh PS, Arya ML, Devika Kumar, Sanjeev V Thomas, Ramshekhar N Menon","doi":"10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Electroencephalography-based (EEG) microstate analysis is a promising and widely studied method in which spontaneous cerebral activity is segmented into sub second level quasi-stable states and analyzed. Currently it is being widely explored due to increasing evidence of the association of microstates with cognitive functioning and large-scale brain networks identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our study using the four archetypal microstates (A, B, C and D), we investigated the changes in resting state EEG microstate dynamics in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) compared to healthy controls (HC). Machine learning was applied to study its feasibility in differentiating between different groups using microstate statistics. We found significant differences in all parameters related to Microstate D (fronto-parietal network) in TLE patients and Microstate B (visual processing) in IGE patients compared to HCs. Occurrence, duration and time coverage of Microstate B was highest in IGE when compared to the other groups. We also found significant deviations in transition probabilities for both epilepsy groups, particularly into Microstate C (salience network) in IGE. Classification accuracy into clinical groups was found to exceed 70% using microstate parameters which improved on incorporating neuropsychological test differences. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to compare and validate the use of microstate features to discriminate between two disparate epilepsy syndromes (TLE, IGE) and HCs using machine learning suggesting that resting state EEG microstates can be used for endophenotyping and to study resting state dysfunction in epilepsy. </p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resting state EEG microstate profiling and a machine-learning based classifier model in epilepsy\",\"authors\":\"Asha SA, Sudalaimani C, Devanand P, Subodh PS, Arya ML, Devika Kumar, Sanjeev V Thomas, Ramshekhar N Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Electroencephalography-based (EEG) microstate analysis is a promising and widely studied method in which spontaneous cerebral activity is segmented into sub second level quasi-stable states and analyzed. Currently it is being widely explored due to increasing evidence of the association of microstates with cognitive functioning and large-scale brain networks identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our study using the four archetypal microstates (A, B, C and D), we investigated the changes in resting state EEG microstate dynamics in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) compared to healthy controls (HC). Machine learning was applied to study its feasibility in differentiating between different groups using microstate statistics. We found significant differences in all parameters related to Microstate D (fronto-parietal network) in TLE patients and Microstate B (visual processing) in IGE patients compared to HCs. Occurrence, duration and time coverage of Microstate B was highest in IGE when compared to the other groups. We also found significant deviations in transition probabilities for both epilepsy groups, particularly into Microstate C (salience network) in IGE. Classification accuracy into clinical groups was found to exceed 70% using microstate parameters which improved on incorporating neuropsychological test differences. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to compare and validate the use of microstate features to discriminate between two disparate epilepsy syndromes (TLE, IGE) and HCs using machine learning suggesting that resting state EEG microstates can be used for endophenotyping and to study resting state dysfunction in epilepsy. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-024-10095-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resting state EEG microstate profiling and a machine-learning based classifier model in epilepsy
Electroencephalography-based (EEG) microstate analysis is a promising and widely studied method in which spontaneous cerebral activity is segmented into sub second level quasi-stable states and analyzed. Currently it is being widely explored due to increasing evidence of the association of microstates with cognitive functioning and large-scale brain networks identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our study using the four archetypal microstates (A, B, C and D), we investigated the changes in resting state EEG microstate dynamics in persons with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) compared to healthy controls (HC). Machine learning was applied to study its feasibility in differentiating between different groups using microstate statistics. We found significant differences in all parameters related to Microstate D (fronto-parietal network) in TLE patients and Microstate B (visual processing) in IGE patients compared to HCs. Occurrence, duration and time coverage of Microstate B was highest in IGE when compared to the other groups. We also found significant deviations in transition probabilities for both epilepsy groups, particularly into Microstate C (salience network) in IGE. Classification accuracy into clinical groups was found to exceed 70% using microstate parameters which improved on incorporating neuropsychological test differences. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to compare and validate the use of microstate features to discriminate between two disparate epilepsy syndromes (TLE, IGE) and HCs using machine learning suggesting that resting state EEG microstates can be used for endophenotyping and to study resting state dysfunction in epilepsy.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.