FGFR2 变异 rs13387042 与乳腺癌风险有关:一项荟萃分析和系统综述

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical breast cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.009
{"title":"FGFR2 变异 rs13387042 与乳腺癌风险有关:一项荟萃分析和系统综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The association of FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism with breast cancer (BC) susceptibility in women remains inconclusive due to varying reports. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism and susceptibility to BC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Relevant literature were acquired through searches across multiple databases. Odds ratio (OR) values were pooled to assess the risk of BC for different alleles and genotypes. The heterogeneity among the included literature was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was used to verify the stability of the results. Egger's linear regression test was used to assess the significance of publication bias of the included literature.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 17 publications were included, encompassing 122,607 cases and 175,966 controls. There was significantly increased risk of BC for allele A compared with G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.14-1.67, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), genotype AA compared with GG (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.38, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and genotype GA compared with GG (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.12-1.26, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Both Egger's test and funnel plot indicated the presence of publication bias. After adjusting potential publication bias by the trim-and-fill method, the comparison of allele A versus G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.13-1.17, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), genotype AA versus GG (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.28-1.37, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and genotype GA versus GG (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09-1.22, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) remained statistically significant. In various subgroups, the allele A showed significantly higher risk of BC upon allele G in estrogen receptor (ER) positive BC, ER negative BC, progesterone receptor (PR) positive BC, PR negative BC, triple-negative BC, pathological grade I BC, grade II BC, and grade III breast cancer. The subsequent sensitivity analysis suggested the above findings stable and reliable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we found that the allele A of the FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. This study underscores its potential as a genetic marker for personalized risk assessment and targeted interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages 552-561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The FGFR2 Variant rs13387042 is Associated With Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The association of FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism with breast cancer (BC) susceptibility in women remains inconclusive due to varying reports. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism and susceptibility to BC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Relevant literature were acquired through searches across multiple databases. Odds ratio (OR) values were pooled to assess the risk of BC for different alleles and genotypes. The heterogeneity among the included literature was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was used to verify the stability of the results. Egger's linear regression test was used to assess the significance of publication bias of the included literature.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 17 publications were included, encompassing 122,607 cases and 175,966 controls. There was significantly increased risk of BC for allele A compared with G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.14-1.67, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), genotype AA compared with GG (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.38, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and genotype GA compared with GG (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.12-1.26, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Both Egger's test and funnel plot indicated the presence of publication bias. After adjusting potential publication bias by the trim-and-fill method, the comparison of allele A versus G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.13-1.17, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), genotype AA versus GG (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.28-1.37, <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and genotype GA versus GG (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09-1.22, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) remained statistically significant. In various subgroups, the allele A showed significantly higher risk of BC upon allele G in estrogen receptor (ER) positive BC, ER negative BC, progesterone receptor (PR) positive BC, PR negative BC, triple-negative BC, pathological grade I BC, grade II BC, and grade III breast cancer. The subsequent sensitivity analysis suggested the above findings stable and reliable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we found that the allele A of the FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. This study underscores its potential as a genetic marker for personalized risk assessment and targeted interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\"24 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 552-561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152682092400082X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152682092400082X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FGFR2-rs13387042多态性与女性乳腺癌(BC)易感性的关系因报道不同而仍无定论。在本研究中,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以探讨 FGFR2-rs13387042 多态性与乳腺癌易感性之间的关系。我们在多个数据库中检索了相关文献。对不同等位基因和基因型的比值(OR)进行汇总,以评估 BC 的风险。对纳入文献的异质性进行了评估。采用敏感性分析来验证结果的稳定性。采用Egger线性回归检验来评估纳入文献的发表偏倚的显著性。共纳入了 17 篇文献,涉及 122,607 例病例和 175,966 例对照。等位基因A与G相比(OR=1.15,95% CI=1.14-1.67,P<0.001),基因型AA与GG相比(OR=1.34,95% CI=1.29-1.38,P<0.001),基因型GA与GG相比(OR=1.19,95% CI=1.12-1.26,P<0.001),罹患BC的风险明显增加。Egger检验和漏斗图均显示存在发表偏倚。通过修剪填充法调整潜在的发表偏倚后,等位基因 A 与 G 的比较(OR=1.15,95% CI=1.13-1.17,P<0.001)、基因型 AA 与 GG 的比较(OR=1.32,95% CI=1.28-1.37,P<0.001)和基因型 GA 与 GG 的比较(OR=1.15,95% CI=1.09-1.22,<0.001)仍具有统计学意义。在不同的亚组中,等位基因 A 在雌激素受体(ER)阳性 BC、ER 阴性 BC、孕激素受体(PR)阳性 BC、PR 阴性 BC、三阴性 BC、病理分级 I 级 BC、II 级 BC 和 III 级乳腺癌中的 BC 风险明显高于等位基因 G。随后的敏感性分析表明,上述结果稳定可靠。在这项研究中,我们发现 FGFR2-rs13387042 多态性的等位基因 A 与乳腺癌发病风险的增加有关。这项研究强调了其作为个性化风险评估和针对性干预的遗传标记的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The FGFR2 Variant rs13387042 is Associated With Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

The association of FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism with breast cancer (BC) susceptibility in women remains inconclusive due to varying reports. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the relationship between FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism and susceptibility to BC.

Methods

Relevant literature were acquired through searches across multiple databases. Odds ratio (OR) values were pooled to assess the risk of BC for different alleles and genotypes. The heterogeneity among the included literature was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was used to verify the stability of the results. Egger's linear regression test was used to assess the significance of publication bias of the included literature.

Results

A total of 17 publications were included, encompassing 122,607 cases and 175,966 controls. There was significantly increased risk of BC for allele A compared with G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.14-1.67, P < .001), genotype AA compared with GG (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.29-1.38, P < .001), and genotype GA compared with GG (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.12-1.26, P < .001). Both Egger's test and funnel plot indicated the presence of publication bias. After adjusting potential publication bias by the trim-and-fill method, the comparison of allele A versus G (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.13-1.17, P < .001), genotype AA versus GG (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.28-1.37, P < .001), and genotype GA versus GG (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.09-1.22, P < .001) remained statistically significant. In various subgroups, the allele A showed significantly higher risk of BC upon allele G in estrogen receptor (ER) positive BC, ER negative BC, progesterone receptor (PR) positive BC, PR negative BC, triple-negative BC, pathological grade I BC, grade II BC, and grade III breast cancer. The subsequent sensitivity analysis suggested the above findings stable and reliable.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that the allele A of the FGFR2-rs13387042 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. This study underscores its potential as a genetic marker for personalized risk assessment and targeted interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Another Biosignature for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ-Have We Moved the Needle? Development and Validation of a Novel Conditional Survival Nomogram for Predicting Real-Time Prognosis in Patients With Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis. Association of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Muscle Quality at Diagnosis With Survival in Young Women With Breast Cancer: Retrospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1