比较正念减压疗法和同情疗法对肠易激综合征患者认知情绪调节的效果。

Q3 Medicine Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.34172/mejdd.2023.358
Tahereh Pourkazem, Ahmad Ghazanfari, Reza Ahmadi
{"title":"比较正念减压疗法和同情疗法对肠易激综合征患者认知情绪调节的效果。","authors":"Tahereh Pourkazem, Ahmad Ghazanfari, Reza Ahmadi","doi":"10.34172/mejdd.2023.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We aimed to compare the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and compassion-focused on the cognitive regulation of emotion in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The research method was the semi-experimental type, with pre-test, post-test, follow-up, and experimental and control groups. <b>Methods:</b> The population included patients with IBS in Isfahan city; 45 of them were selected by convenience sampling method and randomly assigned to 3 groups (15 in each group). Then, the patients of one experimental group received eight sessions of 90 minutes of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program, while the other experimental group received eight sessions of 90 minutes of compassion-focused therapy. The measurement tools included the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski and Kraaij, 2002) and a short clinical interview. Research data were analyzed using variance analysis with repeated measures on one factor (mixed design). <b>Results:</b> Both intervention methods were equally effective in changing the cognitive regulation of adaptive emotion mean scores (<i>P</i><0.01), but the effect of compassion-focused therapy on improving the mean scores of cognitive regulation of adaptive emotion was more than mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> It was concluded that both intervention methods can be used as complementary treatment for patients with IBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18517,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases","volume":"15 4","pages":"277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10955982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Compassion-Focused Therapy on the Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Tahereh Pourkazem, Ahmad Ghazanfari, Reza Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/mejdd.2023.358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> We aimed to compare the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and compassion-focused on the cognitive regulation of emotion in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The research method was the semi-experimental type, with pre-test, post-test, follow-up, and experimental and control groups. <b>Methods:</b> The population included patients with IBS in Isfahan city; 45 of them were selected by convenience sampling method and randomly assigned to 3 groups (15 in each group). Then, the patients of one experimental group received eight sessions of 90 minutes of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program, while the other experimental group received eight sessions of 90 minutes of compassion-focused therapy. The measurement tools included the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski and Kraaij, 2002) and a short clinical interview. Research data were analyzed using variance analysis with repeated measures on one factor (mixed design). <b>Results:</b> Both intervention methods were equally effective in changing the cognitive regulation of adaptive emotion mean scores (<i>P</i><0.01), but the effect of compassion-focused therapy on improving the mean scores of cognitive regulation of adaptive emotion was more than mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> It was concluded that both intervention methods can be used as complementary treatment for patients with IBS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"277-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10955982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2023.358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/mejdd.2023.358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目的是比较正念减压法和同情法对肠易激综合征(IBS)患者情绪认知调节的效果。研究方法为半实验式,分为前测、后测、随访、实验组和对照组。研究方法研究对象包括伊斯法罕市的肠易激综合征患者,采用方便抽样法选出 45 名患者,随机分配到 3 个组(每组 15 人)。然后,一个实验组的患者接受 8 次、每次 90 分钟的正念减压项目,而另一个实验组则接受 8 次、每次 90 分钟的同情疗法。测量工具包括认知情绪调节问卷(Garnefski 和 Kraaij,2002 年)和简短的临床访谈。研究数据采用单因素重复测量方差分析法(混合设计)进行分析。研究结果两种干预方法在改变适应性情绪的认知调节平均得分(PPConclusion:结论:两种干预方法均可作为肠易激综合征患者的辅助治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction and Compassion-Focused Therapy on the Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Background: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and compassion-focused on the cognitive regulation of emotion in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The research method was the semi-experimental type, with pre-test, post-test, follow-up, and experimental and control groups. Methods: The population included patients with IBS in Isfahan city; 45 of them were selected by convenience sampling method and randomly assigned to 3 groups (15 in each group). Then, the patients of one experimental group received eight sessions of 90 minutes of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program, while the other experimental group received eight sessions of 90 minutes of compassion-focused therapy. The measurement tools included the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefski and Kraaij, 2002) and a short clinical interview. Research data were analyzed using variance analysis with repeated measures on one factor (mixed design). Results: Both intervention methods were equally effective in changing the cognitive regulation of adaptive emotion mean scores (P<0.01), but the effect of compassion-focused therapy on improving the mean scores of cognitive regulation of adaptive emotion was more than mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy (P<0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that both intervention methods can be used as complementary treatment for patients with IBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Altered Cytokine Production in Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection. Celiac Crisis: A Life-Threatening Complication of Celiac Disease. Correlation between Autoimmune Hashimoto's Thyroiditis and Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Case-Control Study. Developing Mobile Health Applications for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of Features and Technologies. Ulcerative and Cytomegalovirus Colitis Associated with Fournier's Gangrene: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1