{"title":"[特应性瘙痒共识会议(AICOM)关于瘙痒评估的建议]。","authors":"Toshiya Ebata, Yukihiro Ohya, Yusei Ohshima, Tsugunobu Andoh, Mitsutoshi Tominaga, Yoko Kataoka, Yoshinori Fukui, Nobuyuki Ebihara, Shunji Hasegawa, Shigetoshi Kobayashi, Yutaka Morisawa, Norihiro Inoue, Masami Narita, Sakae Kaneko, Ken Igawa, Takeshi Nakahara, Yozo Ishiuji, Takaharu Okada, Masanori Fujii, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Hiroyuki Irie, Miho Shiratori-Hayashi, Hiroyuki Murota","doi":"10.15036/arerugi.73.171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":35521,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","volume":"73 2","pages":"171-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].\",\"authors\":\"Toshiya Ebata, Yukihiro Ohya, Yusei Ohshima, Tsugunobu Andoh, Mitsutoshi Tominaga, Yoko Kataoka, Yoshinori Fukui, Nobuyuki Ebihara, Shunji Hasegawa, Shigetoshi Kobayashi, Yutaka Morisawa, Norihiro Inoue, Masami Narita, Sakae Kaneko, Ken Igawa, Takeshi Nakahara, Yozo Ishiuji, Takaharu Okada, Masanori Fujii, Hiroshi Kawasaki, Hiroyuki Irie, Miho Shiratori-Hayashi, Hiroyuki Murota\",\"doi\":\"10.15036/arerugi.73.171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Allergology\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"171-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Allergology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15036/arerugi.73.171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15036/arerugi.73.171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[RECOMMENDATION FOR ITCH ASSESSMENT FROM THE ATOPIC ITCH CONSENSUS MEETING (AICOM)].
Background: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.
Methods: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.
Results: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.
Conclusion: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.
期刊介绍:
The Japanese Society of Allergology is made up of medical researchers and clinical physicians who share an involvement in the study of allergies and clinical immunology. Clinical subspecialties include such allergies and immune-response disorders as bronchial asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, collagen disease, allergic rhinitis, pollenosis, hives, atopic dermatitis, and immunodeficiency. However, there are many patients afflicted by other allergies as well. The Society considers all such patients and disorders within its purview.