Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez, Adriana Hernández-Gómez, Juan Manuel Guzmán-Flores, Angel Josabad Alonso-Castro, Nicolás Addiel Serafín-Higuera, Luz Ma-Adriana Balderas-Peña, Lorenzo Franco-de la Torre, Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
{"title":"塞来昔布可减少全膝关节置换术后对救援止痛药的需求:元分析。","authors":"Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez, Adriana Hernández-Gómez, Juan Manuel Guzmán-Flores, Angel Josabad Alonso-Castro, Nicolás Addiel Serafín-Higuera, Luz Ma-Adriana Balderas-Peña, Lorenzo Franco-de la Torre, Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14020035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of celecoxib after total knee arthroplasty. Keywords in the PubMed and Scopus databases were used to find article abstracts. Each included clinical trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, and we extracted data on postoperative pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest, ambulation, and active range of motion, rescue analgesic intake, and adverse effects. Inverse variance tests with mean differences were used to analyze the numerical variables. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and the odds ratio were used to evaluate the dichotomous data. According to this qualitative assessment (<i>n</i> = 482), two studies presented conclusions in favor of celecoxib (<i>n</i> = 187), one showed similar results between celecoxib and the placebo (<i>n</i> = 44), and three clinical trials did not draw conclusions as to the effectiveness of celecoxib versus the placebo (<i>n</i> = 251). Moreover, the evaluation of the rescue analgesic intake showed that the patients receiving celecoxib had a lower intake compared to patients receiving a placebo (<i>n</i> = 278, I<sup>2</sup> = 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.006, mean difference = -6.89, 95% IC = -11.76 to -2.02). In conclusion, the pooled analysis shows that administration of celecoxib alone results in a decrease in rescue analgesic consumption compared to a placebo after total knee surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 2","pages":"461-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Celecoxib Decreases the Need for Rescue Analgesics after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez, Adriana Hernández-Gómez, Juan Manuel Guzmán-Flores, Angel Josabad Alonso-Castro, Nicolás Addiel Serafín-Higuera, Luz Ma-Adriana Balderas-Peña, Lorenzo Franco-de la Torre, Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract14020035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of celecoxib after total knee arthroplasty. Keywords in the PubMed and Scopus databases were used to find article abstracts. Each included clinical trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, and we extracted data on postoperative pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest, ambulation, and active range of motion, rescue analgesic intake, and adverse effects. Inverse variance tests with mean differences were used to analyze the numerical variables. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and the odds ratio were used to evaluate the dichotomous data. According to this qualitative assessment (<i>n</i> = 482), two studies presented conclusions in favor of celecoxib (<i>n</i> = 187), one showed similar results between celecoxib and the placebo (<i>n</i> = 44), and three clinical trials did not draw conclusions as to the effectiveness of celecoxib versus the placebo (<i>n</i> = 251). Moreover, the evaluation of the rescue analgesic intake showed that the patients receiving celecoxib had a lower intake compared to patients receiving a placebo (<i>n</i> = 278, I<sup>2</sup> = 82%, <i>p</i> = 0.006, mean difference = -6.89, 95% IC = -11.76 to -2.02). In conclusion, the pooled analysis shows that administration of celecoxib alone results in a decrease in rescue analgesic consumption compared to a placebo after total knee surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"461-472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10961807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14020035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14020035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Celecoxib Decreases the Need for Rescue Analgesics after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of celecoxib after total knee arthroplasty. Keywords in the PubMed and Scopus databases were used to find article abstracts. Each included clinical trial was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool, and we extracted data on postoperative pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at rest, ambulation, and active range of motion, rescue analgesic intake, and adverse effects. Inverse variance tests with mean differences were used to analyze the numerical variables. The Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and the odds ratio were used to evaluate the dichotomous data. According to this qualitative assessment (n = 482), two studies presented conclusions in favor of celecoxib (n = 187), one showed similar results between celecoxib and the placebo (n = 44), and three clinical trials did not draw conclusions as to the effectiveness of celecoxib versus the placebo (n = 251). Moreover, the evaluation of the rescue analgesic intake showed that the patients receiving celecoxib had a lower intake compared to patients receiving a placebo (n = 278, I2 = 82%, p = 0.006, mean difference = -6.89, 95% IC = -11.76 to -2.02). In conclusion, the pooled analysis shows that administration of celecoxib alone results in a decrease in rescue analgesic consumption compared to a placebo after total knee surgery.