职前教师与 1619 年和 1776 年历史叙事中的爱国主义

Benjamin R. Wellenreiter, Xiaoying Zhao, Tom Lucey
{"title":"职前教师与 1619 年和 1776 年历史叙事中的爱国主义","authors":"Benjamin R. Wellenreiter, Xiaoying Zhao, Tom Lucey","doi":"10.1108/ssrp-12-2023-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposePreservice teachers (n = 39) described their definitions of patriotism and to what extent they believed statements from The 1619 Project (2019) and The 1776 Commission Report (2021) were patriotic.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method survey including open-ended prompts requesting participants’ descriptions of patriotism and Likert scale prompts asking participants to agree/disagree with deidentified statements from The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report. In vivo words reflecting emotional responses to patriotism and the statements informed the categorization process in a second round of coding.FindingsFour categories of patriotism definition were identified. Identified were relationships between groups’ conceptualizations of patriotism and whether statements from history narratives were viewed as patriotic.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the field by exploring the intersectionality of the concept of patriotism with competing narratives regarding the foundation and growth of the United States.","PeriodicalId":447901,"journal":{"name":"Social Studies Research and Practice","volume":" 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preservice teachers and the patriotism of the 1619 and 1776 history narratives\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin R. Wellenreiter, Xiaoying Zhao, Tom Lucey\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ssrp-12-2023-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposePreservice teachers (n = 39) described their definitions of patriotism and to what extent they believed statements from The 1619 Project (2019) and The 1776 Commission Report (2021) were patriotic.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method survey including open-ended prompts requesting participants’ descriptions of patriotism and Likert scale prompts asking participants to agree/disagree with deidentified statements from The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report. In vivo words reflecting emotional responses to patriotism and the statements informed the categorization process in a second round of coding.FindingsFour categories of patriotism definition were identified. Identified were relationships between groups’ conceptualizations of patriotism and whether statements from history narratives were viewed as patriotic.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the field by exploring the intersectionality of the concept of patriotism with competing narratives regarding the foundation and growth of the United States.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Studies Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 33\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Studies Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-12-2023-0073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Studies Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-12-2023-0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在职教师(n = 39)描述了他们对爱国主义的定义,以及他们认为 "1619 项目"(2019 年)和 "1776 委员会报告"(2021 年)中的声明在多大程度上具有爱国主义色彩。设计/方法/途径 本研究采用了一种混合方法调查,包括开放式提示,要求参与者描述爱国主义,以及李克特量表提示,要求参与者同意/不同意 "1619 项目 "和 "1776 委员会报告 "中的去标识声明。在第二轮编码过程中,反映对爱国主义的情感反应的活体词语和声明为分类过程提供了依据。本文通过探讨爱国主义概念与有关美国建国和发展的竞争性叙述之间的交叉性,为该领域做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preservice teachers and the patriotism of the 1619 and 1776 history narratives
PurposePreservice teachers (n = 39) described their definitions of patriotism and to what extent they believed statements from The 1619 Project (2019) and The 1776 Commission Report (2021) were patriotic.Design/methodology/approachThis study employed a mixed-method survey including open-ended prompts requesting participants’ descriptions of patriotism and Likert scale prompts asking participants to agree/disagree with deidentified statements from The 1619 Project and the 1776 Commission Report. In vivo words reflecting emotional responses to patriotism and the statements informed the categorization process in a second round of coding.FindingsFour categories of patriotism definition were identified. Identified were relationships between groups’ conceptualizations of patriotism and whether statements from history narratives were viewed as patriotic.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the field by exploring the intersectionality of the concept of patriotism with competing narratives regarding the foundation and growth of the United States.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where we are: reflecting on our use of critical mapping practices for spatial justice in teacher education “Is it a civics lesson?”: centering the local to encourage political engagement On teaching Holocaust geographies: supporting inquiry into space, persecution and civic action Learning about place from Indigenous Elders: self-study in social studies education Themed editorial: Social studies research and practice special issue: effective use of films in the social studies classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1