公立和私立学校背景下的学校领导自主权:模糊政策要求

Q3 Social Sciences Nordic Studies in Education Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.23865/nse.v44.5762
Alessandra Dieudé, Tine S. Prøitz
{"title":"公立和私立学校背景下的学校领导自主权:模糊政策要求","authors":"Alessandra Dieudé, Tine S. Prøitz","doi":"10.23865/nse.v44.5762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study responds to calls for more nuanced research on school actors’ autonomy in contexts characterized by multiple governance configurations. It investigates school leaders’ autonomy when enacting policy requirements in public and private school contexts, with Norway as an example. The study draws on qualitative data from eight leaders in diverse school contexts, revealing how the increased standardization of competence and assessment requirements challenges school leaders’ autonomy in private and public schools. Using the idea of gap management (Knapp & Hopmann, 2017), we find that there is little overall difference between state-funded private schools and traditional public schools. However, we did find variation in how standardization challenges school leaders’ autonomy. The variation in school leaders’ autonomy seems to lie within the visions of the schools and school leaders.","PeriodicalId":38767,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Education","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Leaders’ Autonomy in Public and Private School Contexts: Blurring Policy Requirements\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Dieudé, Tine S. Prøitz\",\"doi\":\"10.23865/nse.v44.5762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study responds to calls for more nuanced research on school actors’ autonomy in contexts characterized by multiple governance configurations. It investigates school leaders’ autonomy when enacting policy requirements in public and private school contexts, with Norway as an example. The study draws on qualitative data from eight leaders in diverse school contexts, revealing how the increased standardization of competence and assessment requirements challenges school leaders’ autonomy in private and public schools. Using the idea of gap management (Knapp & Hopmann, 2017), we find that there is little overall difference between state-funded private schools and traditional public schools. However, we did find variation in how standardization challenges school leaders’ autonomy. The variation in school leaders’ autonomy seems to lie within the visions of the schools and school leaders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Studies in Education\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v44.5762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/nse.v44.5762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究响应了关于在以多重治理结构为特点的背景下对学校行为者的自主性进行更细致研究的呼吁。它以挪威为例,调查了学校领导在公立和私立学校背景下颁布政策要求时的自主性。研究利用了来自不同学校背景下的八位领导的定性数据,揭示了能力和评估要求的日益标准化如何挑战私立和公立学校领导的自主性。利用差距管理的理念(Knapp & Hopmann, 2017),我们发现国家资助的私立学校与传统公立学校之间总体上差别不大。然而,我们确实发现标准化在如何挑战学校领导的自主性方面存在差异。学校领导自主权的差异似乎在于学校和学校领导的愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
School Leaders’ Autonomy in Public and Private School Contexts: Blurring Policy Requirements
This study responds to calls for more nuanced research on school actors’ autonomy in contexts characterized by multiple governance configurations. It investigates school leaders’ autonomy when enacting policy requirements in public and private school contexts, with Norway as an example. The study draws on qualitative data from eight leaders in diverse school contexts, revealing how the increased standardization of competence and assessment requirements challenges school leaders’ autonomy in private and public schools. Using the idea of gap management (Knapp & Hopmann, 2017), we find that there is little overall difference between state-funded private schools and traditional public schools. However, we did find variation in how standardization challenges school leaders’ autonomy. The variation in school leaders’ autonomy seems to lie within the visions of the schools and school leaders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Education
Nordic Studies in Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
En lyrisk dannelsesreise. Herner Sæverot bokbades av Kristin Knudsen Teacher and Teaching-related Practices Student Teachers May Have Difficulty Believing They Can Enact/Engage in While in Field Practice: Perspectives from Student Teachers and Teachers in Field-practice Schools Holograms or Hemorrhoids? Student Teachers’ Imaginings of the Digital Futures of Education Lekens lange linjer: En historisk analyse av lekbegrepet i læreplandokumenter for norske barnehager og skoler fra 1996 til 2020 Dilemmas in Reception of Newly Arrived Migrant Students: A Local Third Way?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1