{"title":"如何衡量生活水平?十九世纪欧洲的男性工资、非市场生产和家庭收入","authors":"Joyce Burnette","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth-century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non-market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non-market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.</p>","PeriodicalId":47868,"journal":{"name":"Economic History Review","volume":"78 1","pages":"87-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non-market production and household income in nineteenth-century Europe\",\"authors\":\"Joyce Burnette\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ehr.13339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth-century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non-market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non-market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History Review\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"87-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.13339\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.13339","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然男性的实际工资可以用来衡量投入成本,但并不能准确衡量生活水平。本文利用 Le Play 及其同事收集的 19 世纪欧洲家庭的详细记录,证明了非市场生产对家庭消费的重要性。如果我们衡量包括非市场生产在内的所有来源的收入,英国在物质消费方面的优势仅为英国男性工资优势的一半左右。虽然英国男性工资高,但英国妻子工作较少,与欧洲大陆家庭相比,英国家庭更依赖于男户主的收入。
How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non-market production and household income in nineteenth-century Europe
While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth-century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non-market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non-market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.
期刊介绍:
The Economic History Review is published quarterly and each volume contains over 800 pages. It is an invaluable source of information and is available free to members of the Economic History Society. Publishing reviews of books, periodicals and information technology, The Review will keep anyone interested in economic and social history abreast of current developments in the subject. It aims at broad coverage of themes of economic and social change, including the intellectual, political and cultural implications of these changes.