如何衡量生活水平?十九世纪欧洲的男性工资、非市场生产和家庭收入

IF 1.4 1区 历史学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic History Review Pub Date : 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1111/ehr.13339
Joyce Burnette
{"title":"如何衡量生活水平?十九世纪欧洲的男性工资、非市场生产和家庭收入","authors":"Joyce Burnette","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth-century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non-market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non-market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.</p>","PeriodicalId":47868,"journal":{"name":"Economic History Review","volume":"78 1","pages":"87-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non-market production and household income in nineteenth-century Europe\",\"authors\":\"Joyce Burnette\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ehr.13339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth-century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non-market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non-market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History Review\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"87-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.13339\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.13339","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然男性的实际工资可以用来衡量投入成本,但并不能准确衡量生活水平。本文利用 Le Play 及其同事收集的 19 世纪欧洲家庭的详细记录,证明了非市场生产对家庭消费的重要性。如果我们衡量包括非市场生产在内的所有来源的收入,英国在物质消费方面的优势仅为英国男性工资优势的一半左右。虽然英国男性工资高,但英国妻子工作较少,与欧洲大陆家庭相比,英国家庭更依赖于男户主的收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How not to measure the standard of living: Male wages, non-market production and household income in nineteenth-century Europe

While real male wages can be used to measure input costs, they do not provide accurate measures of the standard of living. This paper uses detailed accounts of nineteenth-century European families collected by Le Play and his colleagues to demonstrate the importance of non-market production for household consumption. If we measure income from all sources, including non-market production, the British advantage in material consumption was only about half of the British advantage in male wages. While British male wages were high, British wives worked less and British families were more dependent on the income of the male head than continental families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Economic History Review is published quarterly and each volume contains over 800 pages. It is an invaluable source of information and is available free to members of the Economic History Society. Publishing reviews of books, periodicals and information technology, The Review will keep anyone interested in economic and social history abreast of current developments in the subject. It aims at broad coverage of themes of economic and social change, including the intellectual, political and cultural implications of these changes.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Crisis and Resilience in the Bristol-West India Sugar Trade, 1783–1802. Peter Buckles, (Liverpool University Press, 2024. Pp. 232. 17 fig 3. ISBN 981802078831, Hbk. £95) Review of periodical literature for 2023: (ii) 1100–1500 Review of periodical literature for 2023: (iii) 1500–1700 Correction to ‘Numeracy selectivity of Spanish migrants in colonial America (sixteenth–eighteenth centuries)’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1