Nipun Kumar, R. Meel, S. Bakhshi, D. Pushpam, N. Pushker, M. Bajaj, S. Kashyap, S. Sen, S. Pathy, Sanjay Sharma
{"title":"非转移性眼睑皮脂腺癌的新辅助化疗--10 例报告","authors":"Nipun Kumar, R. Meel, S. Bakhshi, D. Pushpam, N. Pushker, M. Bajaj, S. Kashyap, S. Sen, S. Pathy, Sanjay Sharma","doi":"10.1159/000538295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nEyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) is an aggressive malignancy. Surgical excision is the standard treatment for non-metastatic eyelid SGC. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes with use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and any change in ease/difficulty of surgical treatment in such cases. \nMethods \nThis was a prospective interventional study conducted over 24 months period. Histopathologically confirmed cases without any systemic metastasis were included. Clinico-demographic details were collected for 30 patients. 10 patients received NACT using cisplatin and 5-FU. Tumour response was evaluated, using RECIST criteria. An ease of surgery questionnaire was used to assess difficulty of surgical treatment before and after NACT.\nResults\nOf the 30 patients evaluated for recruitment, 37% had recurrent SGC and 72% had advanced tumour stage. 10 patients were recruited for NACT. There was Partial response in 80% and complete response in 10% cases. Tumour T category downstaging was seen in 50% of cases. While tumour dimensions/ volume reduced substantially, surgical ease improved in only 40% cases. \nConclusion\nA significant proportion of SGC patients evaluated in our study presented with recurrent and/or advanced disease. NACT caused tumour regression in 90% of cases. However, surgical ease improvement was limited, pointing to a need for surgical modification in such cases. Corneal ulceration was noted in 2 cases with large tumors causing a complete mechanical ptosis. Overall, the study introduced an ease of surgery questionnaire and provided insights into benefits and challenges of using NACT for eyelid SGC management.","PeriodicalId":506981,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":" 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Eyelid Sebaceous Gland Carcinoma - Report in 10 Cases\",\"authors\":\"Nipun Kumar, R. Meel, S. Bakhshi, D. Pushpam, N. Pushker, M. Bajaj, S. Kashyap, S. Sen, S. Pathy, Sanjay Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction\\nEyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) is an aggressive malignancy. Surgical excision is the standard treatment for non-metastatic eyelid SGC. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes with use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and any change in ease/difficulty of surgical treatment in such cases. \\nMethods \\nThis was a prospective interventional study conducted over 24 months period. Histopathologically confirmed cases without any systemic metastasis were included. Clinico-demographic details were collected for 30 patients. 10 patients received NACT using cisplatin and 5-FU. Tumour response was evaluated, using RECIST criteria. An ease of surgery questionnaire was used to assess difficulty of surgical treatment before and after NACT.\\nResults\\nOf the 30 patients evaluated for recruitment, 37% had recurrent SGC and 72% had advanced tumour stage. 10 patients were recruited for NACT. There was Partial response in 80% and complete response in 10% cases. Tumour T category downstaging was seen in 50% of cases. While tumour dimensions/ volume reduced substantially, surgical ease improved in only 40% cases. \\nConclusion\\nA significant proportion of SGC patients evaluated in our study presented with recurrent and/or advanced disease. NACT caused tumour regression in 90% of cases. However, surgical ease improvement was limited, pointing to a need for surgical modification in such cases. Corneal ulceration was noted in 2 cases with large tumors causing a complete mechanical ptosis. Overall, the study introduced an ease of surgery questionnaire and provided insights into benefits and challenges of using NACT for eyelid SGC management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"volume\":\" 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocular Oncology and Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Eyelid Sebaceous Gland Carcinoma - Report in 10 Cases
Introduction
Eyelid sebaceous gland carcinoma (SGC) is an aggressive malignancy. Surgical excision is the standard treatment for non-metastatic eyelid SGC. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes with use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and any change in ease/difficulty of surgical treatment in such cases.
Methods
This was a prospective interventional study conducted over 24 months period. Histopathologically confirmed cases without any systemic metastasis were included. Clinico-demographic details were collected for 30 patients. 10 patients received NACT using cisplatin and 5-FU. Tumour response was evaluated, using RECIST criteria. An ease of surgery questionnaire was used to assess difficulty of surgical treatment before and after NACT.
Results
Of the 30 patients evaluated for recruitment, 37% had recurrent SGC and 72% had advanced tumour stage. 10 patients were recruited for NACT. There was Partial response in 80% and complete response in 10% cases. Tumour T category downstaging was seen in 50% of cases. While tumour dimensions/ volume reduced substantially, surgical ease improved in only 40% cases.
Conclusion
A significant proportion of SGC patients evaluated in our study presented with recurrent and/or advanced disease. NACT caused tumour regression in 90% of cases. However, surgical ease improvement was limited, pointing to a need for surgical modification in such cases. Corneal ulceration was noted in 2 cases with large tumors causing a complete mechanical ptosis. Overall, the study introduced an ease of surgery questionnaire and provided insights into benefits and challenges of using NACT for eyelid SGC management.