{"title":"在不同的使用期对基桩嵌体的基牙状况进行比较分析","authors":"R.V. Bilobrov","doi":"10.31718/2077-1096.24.1.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to compare the condition of abutment teeth restored with stump inlays over different periods of use by applying periotestometry and radiography findings. \nMaterials and methods. Ninety-six patients with extensively decayed dental crowns, including low crowns, were examined and treated. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (main group, standard method for inlays) and Group B (control group, domestic ashless plastic used for modeling). Each group was further divided into three subgroups: A1 and B1 (single-rooted teeth with different crown types), A2 and B2 (collapsible cusp inlays with subsequent artificial crowns), and A3 and B3 (cusp inlays for bridge structures). The stability of the tooth was determined using a Periotest periotestometer (Germany), with scores ranging from -08 to +50 units. Radiological diagnostics and monitoring were conducted using targeted dental radiography with the X-genus DS apparatus. The degree of alveolar bone resorption was quantified using the Fuchs index of alveolar bone destruction. \nResult. In group A1, prosthetics with full cast crowns prior to orthopedic treatment initially improved stability by 2.93%, but this effect diminished by 3.39% after 12 months. Both metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns led to a decline in stability over the study period. Group B1 exhibited a stability increase of 1.42%, which reduced to 1.14% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns influenced tooth stability differently throughout the study. Within group B2, prosthetics with full cast crowns initially raised stability by 1.92%, yet this effect decreased to 0.28% after 12 months. Similarly, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns indicated fluctuations in stability of supporting teeth over the study duration. In group A3, prosthetics with full cast bridges prior to orthopedic treatment initially increased stability by 0.86%, declining to a decrease of 2.07% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic bridges exhibited a smaller indicator at 6 months compared to pre-treatment, with this decrease persisting after 12 months. Conversely, all-ceramic bridges demonstrated stability enhancement by 0.61% after 6 months, persisting higher by 1.92% after 12 months. For group B3, prosthetics with full cast bridges prior to orthopedic treatment increased stability by 1.55%, maintaining a higher stability by 1.91% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic bridges indicated a decrease at 6 months compared to pre-treatment, persisting after 12 months. All-ceramic bridges showed a stability decrease by 2.42% after 6 months, yet remaining higher by 1.92% after 12 months compared to pre-treatment levels. \nConclusions. The choice of prosthetic method for the manufacture of pin-and-stem inlays should be justified, taking into account the clinical situation and individual needs of each patient.","PeriodicalId":24028,"journal":{"name":"Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини: Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ABUTMENT TOOTH CONDITION WITH STUMP INLAYS OVER VARIED USAGE PERIODS\",\"authors\":\"R.V. Bilobrov\",\"doi\":\"10.31718/2077-1096.24.1.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to compare the condition of abutment teeth restored with stump inlays over different periods of use by applying periotestometry and radiography findings. \\nMaterials and methods. Ninety-six patients with extensively decayed dental crowns, including low crowns, were examined and treated. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (main group, standard method for inlays) and Group B (control group, domestic ashless plastic used for modeling). Each group was further divided into three subgroups: A1 and B1 (single-rooted teeth with different crown types), A2 and B2 (collapsible cusp inlays with subsequent artificial crowns), and A3 and B3 (cusp inlays for bridge structures). The stability of the tooth was determined using a Periotest periotestometer (Germany), with scores ranging from -08 to +50 units. Radiological diagnostics and monitoring were conducted using targeted dental radiography with the X-genus DS apparatus. The degree of alveolar bone resorption was quantified using the Fuchs index of alveolar bone destruction. \\nResult. In group A1, prosthetics with full cast crowns prior to orthopedic treatment initially improved stability by 2.93%, but this effect diminished by 3.39% after 12 months. Both metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns led to a decline in stability over the study period. Group B1 exhibited a stability increase of 1.42%, which reduced to 1.14% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns influenced tooth stability differently throughout the study. Within group B2, prosthetics with full cast crowns initially raised stability by 1.92%, yet this effect decreased to 0.28% after 12 months. Similarly, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns indicated fluctuations in stability of supporting teeth over the study duration. In group A3, prosthetics with full cast bridges prior to orthopedic treatment initially increased stability by 0.86%, declining to a decrease of 2.07% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic bridges exhibited a smaller indicator at 6 months compared to pre-treatment, with this decrease persisting after 12 months. Conversely, all-ceramic bridges demonstrated stability enhancement by 0.61% after 6 months, persisting higher by 1.92% after 12 months. For group B3, prosthetics with full cast bridges prior to orthopedic treatment increased stability by 1.55%, maintaining a higher stability by 1.91% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic bridges indicated a decrease at 6 months compared to pre-treatment, persisting after 12 months. All-ceramic bridges showed a stability decrease by 2.42% after 6 months, yet remaining higher by 1.92% after 12 months compared to pre-treatment levels. \\nConclusions. The choice of prosthetic method for the manufacture of pin-and-stem inlays should be justified, taking into account the clinical situation and individual needs of each patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":24028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини: Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини: Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.24.1.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Актуальні проблеми сучасної медицини: Вісник Української медичної стоматологічної академії","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31718/2077-1096.24.1.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过应用牙周测试法和放射线检查结果,比较使用残端嵌体修复的基牙在不同使用期的状况。材料和方法对 96 名牙冠广泛龋坏(包括低冠)的患者进行了检查和治疗。患者分为两组:A 组(主组,采用标准方法镶牙)和 B 组(对照组,采用国产无灰塑料建模)。每组又分为三个亚组:A1 和 B1(带有不同牙冠类型的单根牙齿)、A2 和 B2(带有后续人工牙冠的可折叠尖牙嵌体)以及 A3 和 B3(用于桥体结构的尖牙嵌体)。牙齿的稳定性是通过 Periotest periotestometer(德国)测定的,分值从 -08 到 +50 个单位不等。使用 X-genus DS 仪器进行有针对性的牙科放射诊断和监测。牙槽骨吸收的程度使用牙槽骨破坏的 Fuchs 指数进行量化。结果。在 A1 组中,在矫形治疗前使用全铸冠修复的稳定性最初提高了 2.93%,但在 12 个月后,这种效果降低了 3.39%。在研究期间,金属陶瓷冠和全陶瓷冠都导致稳定性下降。B1 组的稳定性提高了 1.42%,12 个月后又降低了 1.14%。在整个研究过程中,金属陶瓷冠和全瓷冠对牙齿稳定性的影响各不相同。在 B2 组中,使用全铸冠修复的牙齿稳定性最初提高了 1.92%,但 12 个月后这一影响降至 0.28%。同样,金属陶瓷冠和全瓷冠在研究期间对支持牙齿稳定性的影响也不尽相同。在 A3 组中,在矫形治疗前使用全铸桥修复的稳定性最初增加了 0.86%,12 个月后下降到 2.07%。与治疗前相比,金属陶瓷桥在 6 个月时显示出较小的指标,12 个月后这一下降趋势仍在持续。相反,全瓷桥的稳定性在 6 个月后提高了 0.61%,12 个月后继续提高了 1.92%。在 B3 组中,在矫形治疗前使用全铸桥的修复体的稳定性提高了 1.55%,12 个月后的稳定性维持在 1.91% 的较高水平。金属陶瓷桥在 6 个月时的稳定性比矫治前有所下降,12 个月后依然如此。全陶瓷牙桥的稳定性在 6 个月后下降了 2.42%,但在 12 个月后仍比治疗前提高了 1.92%。结论针干嵌体修复方法的选择应考虑临床情况和每位患者的个性化需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ABUTMENT TOOTH CONDITION WITH STUMP INLAYS OVER VARIED USAGE PERIODS
The aim of this study is to compare the condition of abutment teeth restored with stump inlays over different periods of use by applying periotestometry and radiography findings. Materials and methods. Ninety-six patients with extensively decayed dental crowns, including low crowns, were examined and treated. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (main group, standard method for inlays) and Group B (control group, domestic ashless plastic used for modeling). Each group was further divided into three subgroups: A1 and B1 (single-rooted teeth with different crown types), A2 and B2 (collapsible cusp inlays with subsequent artificial crowns), and A3 and B3 (cusp inlays for bridge structures). The stability of the tooth was determined using a Periotest periotestometer (Germany), with scores ranging from -08 to +50 units. Radiological diagnostics and monitoring were conducted using targeted dental radiography with the X-genus DS apparatus. The degree of alveolar bone resorption was quantified using the Fuchs index of alveolar bone destruction. Result. In group A1, prosthetics with full cast crowns prior to orthopedic treatment initially improved stability by 2.93%, but this effect diminished by 3.39% after 12 months. Both metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns led to a decline in stability over the study period. Group B1 exhibited a stability increase of 1.42%, which reduced to 1.14% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns influenced tooth stability differently throughout the study. Within group B2, prosthetics with full cast crowns initially raised stability by 1.92%, yet this effect decreased to 0.28% after 12 months. Similarly, metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns indicated fluctuations in stability of supporting teeth over the study duration. In group A3, prosthetics with full cast bridges prior to orthopedic treatment initially increased stability by 0.86%, declining to a decrease of 2.07% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic bridges exhibited a smaller indicator at 6 months compared to pre-treatment, with this decrease persisting after 12 months. Conversely, all-ceramic bridges demonstrated stability enhancement by 0.61% after 6 months, persisting higher by 1.92% after 12 months. For group B3, prosthetics with full cast bridges prior to orthopedic treatment increased stability by 1.55%, maintaining a higher stability by 1.91% after 12 months. Metal-ceramic bridges indicated a decrease at 6 months compared to pre-treatment, persisting after 12 months. All-ceramic bridges showed a stability decrease by 2.42% after 6 months, yet remaining higher by 1.92% after 12 months compared to pre-treatment levels. Conclusions. The choice of prosthetic method for the manufacture of pin-and-stem inlays should be justified, taking into account the clinical situation and individual needs of each patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MYCOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF CYSTIC CONTENT IN PATIENTS WITH POLYMICROCYSTIC CHANGES OF THE MAXILLARY SINUS MUCOSA DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF TUBERCULOSIS AND NON-SPECIFIC PULMONARY INFILTRATS (Lecture) IMPROVEMENT OF CAPILLAROSCOPY METHOD FOR STUDYING HUMAN MICROCIRCULATION INDICATORS OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE COMPOSITION OF THE GUT COMMENSAL MICROBIOTA AS BIOMARKERS OF HOMEOSTASIS DYNAMIC CHANGES IN HISTOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRIC INDICATORS OF THE LUNGS IN SEXUALLY IMMATURE RATS DURING SIMULATION OF PARTIAL TRACHEAL STENOSIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1