{"title":"索托拉西布(Lumacre)","authors":"Cadth","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nCADTH recommends that public drug plans should not reimburse Lumakras for the treatment of adult patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) G12C-mutated locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. \nThe clinical evidence reviewed by CADTH was insufficient to conclude that treatment with Lumakras results in a clinically meaningful delay in disease progression compared with docetaxel. It was impossible to assess whether treatment with Lumakras would prolong survival relative to docetaxel. \nPatients identified the need for more effective treatments that delay disease progression, prolong survival, control disease symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce side effects, and offer an oral route of administration. While Lumakras offers an oral route of administration, it is not clear whether Lumakras meets the other needs identified by patients. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sotorasib (Lumakras)\",\"authors\":\"Cadth\",\"doi\":\"10.51731/cjht.2024.857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nCADTH recommends that public drug plans should not reimburse Lumakras for the treatment of adult patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) G12C-mutated locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. \\nThe clinical evidence reviewed by CADTH was insufficient to conclude that treatment with Lumakras results in a clinically meaningful delay in disease progression compared with docetaxel. It was impossible to assess whether treatment with Lumakras would prolong survival relative to docetaxel. \\nPatients identified the need for more effective treatments that delay disease progression, prolong survival, control disease symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce side effects, and offer an oral route of administration. While Lumakras offers an oral route of administration, it is not clear whether Lumakras meets the other needs identified by patients. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":9437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CADTH recommends that public drug plans should not reimburse Lumakras for the treatment of adult patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) G12C-mutated locally advanced (not amenable to curative therapy) or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy.
The clinical evidence reviewed by CADTH was insufficient to conclude that treatment with Lumakras results in a clinically meaningful delay in disease progression compared with docetaxel. It was impossible to assess whether treatment with Lumakras would prolong survival relative to docetaxel.
Patients identified the need for more effective treatments that delay disease progression, prolong survival, control disease symptoms, improve quality of life, reduce side effects, and offer an oral route of administration. While Lumakras offers an oral route of administration, it is not clear whether Lumakras meets the other needs identified by patients.