Optune (NovoTTF-200A)

Cadth
{"title":"Optune (NovoTTF-200A)","authors":"Cadth","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Indication Under Review? \n \nThe indication under review is for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (ndGBM) following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiotherapy together with and after standard of care maintenance chemotherapy. Glioblastoma is the development of cancer among glial cells in the central nervous system and is the most common form of brain cancer in Canada. \n \nWhat Is Optune? \n \nOptune is a medical device that produces alternating electrical fields called tumour-treating fields to target the growth of cancerous cells in addition to chemotherapy. Current treatment for glioblastoma consists of a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. \n \nHow Did CADTH Evaluate This Device? \n \nTo examine the value of Optune for the treatment of ndGBM, CADTH: \n \nreviewed and critically appraised the clinical and economic evidence submitted by the sponsor \nreviewed the literature to identify and describe ethical considerations relevant to the use of Optune, as well as to assess the validity of the sponsor’s modelling approaches, assumptions, and estimates regarding Optune \nsought input from patient and clinician groups and consulted an expert panel. \n \n \n \nWhat Did CADTH Find? \nClinical Evidence \n \nThis review included the EF-14 trial, a pivotal, multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of Optune plus temozolomide in adults with ndGBM following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiotherapy, together with and after standard of care maintenance chemotherapy. \nBased on the single trial, there is evidence of low to moderate certainty that Optune plus temozolomide likely increases progression-free survival at 6 months of treatment and overall survival at 24 months of treatment compared to temozolomide alone. The treatment effect of Optune plus temozolomide on progression-free survival and overall survival may be dose-dependent, with at least 18 hours of daily use required for the most benefit. \nOverall, the evidence was of very low to moderate certainty due to concerns regarding selection bias and low generalizability of the results to real-world settings. \n \nEconomic Evidence \n \nThe submitted fee for Optune is $27,000 per month, which is added to the cost of temozolomide based on its public list price. \nThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for Optune plus temozolomide versus temozolomide alone was $899,470 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (incremental costs = $336,902; incremental QALYs = 0.37). \nOptune plus temozolomide was not considered cost-effective relative to temozolomide alone at conventional willingness-to pay thresholds (i.e., $50,000 per QALY gained and $100,000 per QALY gained). Consequently, a price reduction of between 91% and 97% would be required for Optune plus temozolomide to be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold between $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained. \nThe budget impact of reimbursing Optune through the federal, provincial, and territorial public drug plans (excluding Quebec) is estimated to be $75,795,323 to cover 232 patients over the initial 3 years of funding. \n \nEthical Considerations \n \nThe extent to which Optune meets patients’ needs for an effective, accessible, and easily usable treatment may depend on an individual patient’s values and caregiver support network, especially as Optune requires managing an additional treatment modality and may require additional caregiver support. \nFurther study on how — or if — factors such as functional status, race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, and availability of caregiver support have implications for device uptake and ability to adhere to treatment would be helpful to inform patient-centred and equitable use, given the diverse patient population in Canada. \nCareful attention must be paid to the quality of clinical consent conversations, including considerations of disease progression potentially impairing capacity to consent and requiring a substitute decision-maker. \nEquity-enhancing strategies for implementation will need to be explored to ensure that Optune is accessible in an equitable and effective manner for all eligible patients in Canada. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"67 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optune (NovoTTF-200A)\",\"authors\":\"Cadth\",\"doi\":\"10.51731/cjht.2024.859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What Is the Indication Under Review? \\n \\nThe indication under review is for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (ndGBM) following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiotherapy together with and after standard of care maintenance chemotherapy. Glioblastoma is the development of cancer among glial cells in the central nervous system and is the most common form of brain cancer in Canada. \\n \\nWhat Is Optune? \\n \\nOptune is a medical device that produces alternating electrical fields called tumour-treating fields to target the growth of cancerous cells in addition to chemotherapy. Current treatment for glioblastoma consists of a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. \\n \\nHow Did CADTH Evaluate This Device? \\n \\nTo examine the value of Optune for the treatment of ndGBM, CADTH: \\n \\nreviewed and critically appraised the clinical and economic evidence submitted by the sponsor \\nreviewed the literature to identify and describe ethical considerations relevant to the use of Optune, as well as to assess the validity of the sponsor’s modelling approaches, assumptions, and estimates regarding Optune \\nsought input from patient and clinician groups and consulted an expert panel. \\n \\n \\n \\nWhat Did CADTH Find? \\nClinical Evidence \\n \\nThis review included the EF-14 trial, a pivotal, multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of Optune plus temozolomide in adults with ndGBM following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiotherapy, together with and after standard of care maintenance chemotherapy. \\nBased on the single trial, there is evidence of low to moderate certainty that Optune plus temozolomide likely increases progression-free survival at 6 months of treatment and overall survival at 24 months of treatment compared to temozolomide alone. The treatment effect of Optune plus temozolomide on progression-free survival and overall survival may be dose-dependent, with at least 18 hours of daily use required for the most benefit. \\nOverall, the evidence was of very low to moderate certainty due to concerns regarding selection bias and low generalizability of the results to real-world settings. \\n \\nEconomic Evidence \\n \\nThe submitted fee for Optune is $27,000 per month, which is added to the cost of temozolomide based on its public list price. \\nThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for Optune plus temozolomide versus temozolomide alone was $899,470 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (incremental costs = $336,902; incremental QALYs = 0.37). \\nOptune plus temozolomide was not considered cost-effective relative to temozolomide alone at conventional willingness-to pay thresholds (i.e., $50,000 per QALY gained and $100,000 per QALY gained). Consequently, a price reduction of between 91% and 97% would be required for Optune plus temozolomide to be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold between $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained. \\nThe budget impact of reimbursing Optune through the federal, provincial, and territorial public drug plans (excluding Quebec) is estimated to be $75,795,323 to cover 232 patients over the initial 3 years of funding. \\n \\nEthical Considerations \\n \\nThe extent to which Optune meets patients’ needs for an effective, accessible, and easily usable treatment may depend on an individual patient’s values and caregiver support network, especially as Optune requires managing an additional treatment modality and may require additional caregiver support. \\nFurther study on how — or if — factors such as functional status, race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, and availability of caregiver support have implications for device uptake and ability to adhere to treatment would be helpful to inform patient-centred and equitable use, given the diverse patient population in Canada. \\nCareful attention must be paid to the quality of clinical consent conversations, including considerations of disease progression potentially impairing capacity to consent and requiring a substitute decision-maker. \\nEquity-enhancing strategies for implementation will need to be explored to ensure that Optune is accessible in an equitable and effective manner for all eligible patients in Canada. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":9437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"67 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查中的适应症是什么? 正在接受审查的适应症是用于治疗新确诊的多形性胶质母细胞瘤(ndGBM)成人患者,这些患者在接受了最大限度的剥离手术和放疗,以及标准护理维持化疗之后。胶质母细胞瘤是中枢神经系统胶质细胞发生的癌症,是加拿大最常见的脑癌。 什么是 Optune? Optune 是一种医疗设备,可产生被称为肿瘤治疗场的交变电场,在化疗的基础上针对癌细胞的生长进行治疗。目前治疗胶质母细胞瘤的方法包括手术、放疗和化疗。 CADTH 如何评估该设备? 为了研究 Optune 对治疗 ndGBM 的价值,CADTH:审查并严格评估了赞助商提交的临床和经济证据,审查文献以确定和描述与 Optune 的使用相关的伦理考虑,以及评估赞助商有关 Optune 的建模方法、假设和估计的有效性,征求患者和临床医生团体的意见,并咨询专家小组。 CADTH 发现了什么?临床证据 本次审查包括 EF-14 试验,这是一项关键性、多中心、开放标签随机对照试验,评估了 Optune 加替莫唑胺治疗成人 ndGBM 患者的疗效和安全性,这些患者在接受最大限度的剥脱手术并完成放疗后,同时接受标准护理维持化疗。根据单项试验结果,有中低度确定性证据表明,与单用替莫唑胺相比,Optune 加替莫唑胺可能会提高治疗 6 个月时的无进展生存期和治疗 24 个月时的总生存期。Optune联合替莫唑胺对无进展生存期和总生存期的治疗效果可能与剂量有关,至少需要每天用药18小时才能获得最大疗效。总体而言,由于存在选择偏倚和结果对现实世界环境的普遍适用性较低等问题,证据的确定性为极低至中等。 经济学证据 Optune的提交费用为每月27,000美元,该费用根据替莫唑胺的公开上市价格计入其成本。Optune联合替莫唑胺与单独使用替莫唑胺相比,每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比为899,470美元(增量成本=336,902美元;增量质量调整生命年=0.37)。在常规支付意愿阈值下(即每质量调整生命年增益 50,000 美元和每质量调整生命年增益 100,000 美元),Optune 加替莫唑胺相对于单独使用替莫唑胺不具成本效益。因此,在每 QALY 收益 50,000 美元至 100,000 美元的支付意愿阈值下,Optune 加替莫唑胺治疗需要降价 91% 至 97%,才能被视为具有成本效益。通过联邦、省和地区公共药物计划(不包括魁北克省)对 Optune 进行报销的预算影响估计为 75,795,323 美元,在最初 3 年的资助期内可覆盖 232 名患者。 伦理方面的考虑 Optune 能在多大程度上满足患者对有效、方便和易于使用的治疗方法的需求,可能取决于患者个人的价值观和护理人员的支持网络,尤其是 Optune 需要管理一种额外的治疗方式,并可能需要额外的护理人员支持。鉴于加拿大患者群体的多样性,进一步研究功能状态、种族、性别、年龄、社会经济状况和护理人员支持的可用性等因素如何或是否会对设备的使用和坚持治疗的能力产生影响,将有助于为以患者为中心的公平使用提供信息。必须认真关注临床同意谈话的质量,包括考虑疾病进展可能损害同意能力和需要替代决策者的情况。需要探索提高公平性的实施策略,以确保加拿大所有符合条件的患者都能公平、有效地使用 Optune。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optune (NovoTTF-200A)
What Is the Indication Under Review? The indication under review is for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (ndGBM) following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiotherapy together with and after standard of care maintenance chemotherapy. Glioblastoma is the development of cancer among glial cells in the central nervous system and is the most common form of brain cancer in Canada. What Is Optune? Optune is a medical device that produces alternating electrical fields called tumour-treating fields to target the growth of cancerous cells in addition to chemotherapy. Current treatment for glioblastoma consists of a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. How Did CADTH Evaluate This Device? To examine the value of Optune for the treatment of ndGBM, CADTH: reviewed and critically appraised the clinical and economic evidence submitted by the sponsor reviewed the literature to identify and describe ethical considerations relevant to the use of Optune, as well as to assess the validity of the sponsor’s modelling approaches, assumptions, and estimates regarding Optune sought input from patient and clinician groups and consulted an expert panel. What Did CADTH Find? Clinical Evidence This review included the EF-14 trial, a pivotal, multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of Optune plus temozolomide in adults with ndGBM following maximal debulking surgery and completion of radiotherapy, together with and after standard of care maintenance chemotherapy. Based on the single trial, there is evidence of low to moderate certainty that Optune plus temozolomide likely increases progression-free survival at 6 months of treatment and overall survival at 24 months of treatment compared to temozolomide alone. The treatment effect of Optune plus temozolomide on progression-free survival and overall survival may be dose-dependent, with at least 18 hours of daily use required for the most benefit. Overall, the evidence was of very low to moderate certainty due to concerns regarding selection bias and low generalizability of the results to real-world settings. Economic Evidence The submitted fee for Optune is $27,000 per month, which is added to the cost of temozolomide based on its public list price. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for Optune plus temozolomide versus temozolomide alone was $899,470 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (incremental costs = $336,902; incremental QALYs = 0.37). Optune plus temozolomide was not considered cost-effective relative to temozolomide alone at conventional willingness-to pay thresholds (i.e., $50,000 per QALY gained and $100,000 per QALY gained). Consequently, a price reduction of between 91% and 97% would be required for Optune plus temozolomide to be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold between $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY gained. The budget impact of reimbursing Optune through the federal, provincial, and territorial public drug plans (excluding Quebec) is estimated to be $75,795,323 to cover 232 patients over the initial 3 years of funding. Ethical Considerations The extent to which Optune meets patients’ needs for an effective, accessible, and easily usable treatment may depend on an individual patient’s values and caregiver support network, especially as Optune requires managing an additional treatment modality and may require additional caregiver support. Further study on how — or if — factors such as functional status, race, sex, age, socioeconomic status, and availability of caregiver support have implications for device uptake and ability to adhere to treatment would be helpful to inform patient-centred and equitable use, given the diverse patient population in Canada. Careful attention must be paid to the quality of clinical consent conversations, including considerations of disease progression potentially impairing capacity to consent and requiring a substitute decision-maker. Equity-enhancing strategies for implementation will need to be explored to ensure that Optune is accessible in an equitable and effective manner for all eligible patients in Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relugolix (Orgovyx) Nabilone for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus in Canada 2023 Abstracts of the Canadian Association for Population Therapeutics The Development of a Model Validation Tool to Assist in the Conduct of Economic Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1