与患有慢性病的成人远程医疗质量和体验相关的患者因素

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae026
Esther S Yoon, Scott Hur, Laura M Curtis, J. Y. Benavente, Michael S Wolf, M. Serper
{"title":"与患有慢性病的成人远程医疗质量和体验相关的患者因素","authors":"Esther S Yoon, Scott Hur, Laura M Curtis, J. Y. Benavente, Michael S Wolf, M. Serper","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n To evaluate patient-reported experiences of telehealth and disparities in access, use, and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n \n \n \n We examined data from the 5th wave of the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) study conducted between December 2020 and March 2021.\n \n \n \n Of the 718 participants, 342 (47.6%) reported having a telehealth visit within the past four months. Participants who had a recent telehealth visit were younger, reported worse overall health and chronic illness burden, and living below poverty level. Among participants who had a telehealth visit, 66.7% reported telephone visits and most participants (57.6%) rated telehealth quality as better-or-equal-to in-person visits. Inadequate health literacy was associated with lower likelihood of reporting telehealth quality and usefulness. In multivariable analyses, lower patient activation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.59) and limited English proficiency (AOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.47) were less likely to report telehealth as being better than in-person visits; lower patient activation (AOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.003–0.41) and income below poverty level (AOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13–0.98) were associated with difficulty remembering telehealth visit information.\n \n \n \n Most participants reported usefulness and ease of navigating telehealth. Lower socioeconomic status, limited English proficiency, inadequate health literacy, lower educational attainment, and low patient activation are risks for poorer quality telehealth.\n \n \n \n The COVID pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telehealth, however disparities in access and self-reported visit quality persist. Since telemedicine is here to stay, we identify vulnerable populations and discuss potential solutions to reduce healthcare disparities in telehealth use.\n","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient factors associated with telehealth quality and experience among adults with chronic conditions\",\"authors\":\"Esther S Yoon, Scott Hur, Laura M Curtis, J. Y. Benavente, Michael S Wolf, M. Serper\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n To evaluate patient-reported experiences of telehealth and disparities in access, use, and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic.\\n \\n \\n \\n We examined data from the 5th wave of the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) study conducted between December 2020 and March 2021.\\n \\n \\n \\n Of the 718 participants, 342 (47.6%) reported having a telehealth visit within the past four months. Participants who had a recent telehealth visit were younger, reported worse overall health and chronic illness burden, and living below poverty level. Among participants who had a telehealth visit, 66.7% reported telephone visits and most participants (57.6%) rated telehealth quality as better-or-equal-to in-person visits. Inadequate health literacy was associated with lower likelihood of reporting telehealth quality and usefulness. In multivariable analyses, lower patient activation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.59) and limited English proficiency (AOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.47) were less likely to report telehealth as being better than in-person visits; lower patient activation (AOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.003–0.41) and income below poverty level (AOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13–0.98) were associated with difficulty remembering telehealth visit information.\\n \\n \\n \\n Most participants reported usefulness and ease of navigating telehealth. Lower socioeconomic status, limited English proficiency, inadequate health literacy, lower educational attainment, and low patient activation are risks for poorer quality telehealth.\\n \\n \\n \\n The COVID pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telehealth, however disparities in access and self-reported visit quality persist. Since telemedicine is here to stay, we identify vulnerable populations and discuss potential solutions to reduce healthcare disparities in telehealth use.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":36278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMIA Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估患者报告的远程医疗体验,以及 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗在获取、使用和满意度方面的差异。 我们研究了 2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 3 月期间开展的 COVID-19 与慢性病(C3)研究第五波的数据。 在 718 名参与者中,有 342 人(47.6%)表示在过去四个月内进行过远程医疗就诊。最近接受过远程保健就诊的参与者年龄较轻,总体健康状况和慢性病负担较差,生活在贫困线以下。在接受过远程保健就诊的参与者中,66.7%的人表示接受过电话就诊,大多数参与者(57.6%)将远程保健的质量评为优于或等同于亲自就诊。健康知识不足与报告远程保健质量和实用性的可能性较低有关。在多变量分析中,患者积极性较低(调整后的几率比(AOR)为 0.19,95% CI 为 0.05-0.59)和英语水平有限(AOR 为 0.12,95% CI 为 0.03-0.47)的人较少报告远程保健优于面对面就诊;患者积极性较低(AOR 为 0.06,95% CI 为 0.003-0.41)和收入低于贫困线(AOR 为 0.36,95% CI 为 0.13-0.98)的人与难以记住远程保健就诊信息有关。 大多数参与者都表示远程医疗非常有用且易于操作。社会经济地位较低、英语水平有限、健康知识不足、教育程度较低以及患者积极性较低,都是导致远程医疗质量较差的风险因素。 COVID 大流行加速了远程医疗的采用,但在获取和自我报告的就诊质量方面仍存在差距。由于远程医疗将继续存在,我们将确定弱势人群,并讨论潜在的解决方案,以减少远程医疗使用中的医疗差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient factors associated with telehealth quality and experience among adults with chronic conditions
To evaluate patient-reported experiences of telehealth and disparities in access, use, and satisfaction with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined data from the 5th wave of the COVID-19 & Chronic Conditions (C3) study conducted between December 2020 and March 2021. Of the 718 participants, 342 (47.6%) reported having a telehealth visit within the past four months. Participants who had a recent telehealth visit were younger, reported worse overall health and chronic illness burden, and living below poverty level. Among participants who had a telehealth visit, 66.7% reported telephone visits and most participants (57.6%) rated telehealth quality as better-or-equal-to in-person visits. Inadequate health literacy was associated with lower likelihood of reporting telehealth quality and usefulness. In multivariable analyses, lower patient activation (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.05–0.59) and limited English proficiency (AOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.47) were less likely to report telehealth as being better than in-person visits; lower patient activation (AOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.003–0.41) and income below poverty level (AOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13–0.98) were associated with difficulty remembering telehealth visit information. Most participants reported usefulness and ease of navigating telehealth. Lower socioeconomic status, limited English proficiency, inadequate health literacy, lower educational attainment, and low patient activation are risks for poorer quality telehealth. The COVID pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telehealth, however disparities in access and self-reported visit quality persist. Since telemedicine is here to stay, we identify vulnerable populations and discuss potential solutions to reduce healthcare disparities in telehealth use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
A landmark federal interagency collaboration to promote data science in health care: Million Veteran Program-Computational Health Analytics for Medical Precision to Improve Outcomes Now. Targetable molecular algorithm and training platform development for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity data collection across electronic health record platforms: a national cross-sectional survey. Assessing the use of unstructured electronic health record data to identify exposure to firearm violence. Developing personas to inform the design of digital interventions for perinatal mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1