埃塞俄比亚中部商业家禽养殖场生物安全水平评估

Dejene Tadesse, Zerihun Aseffa, A. Wirtu, T. Sori
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚中部商业家禽养殖场生物安全水平评估","authors":"Dejene Tadesse, Zerihun Aseffa, A. Wirtu, T. Sori","doi":"10.4314/evj.v28i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper biosecurity practice is crucial in poultry farming to reduce the risk of diseases. A study was conducted in Adama, Ada’a, and Lume  districts, central Ethiopia, to assess the biosecurity measures of commercial poultry farms. A total of 51 farms were randomly selected,  and their geographical locations were recorded using GPS devices. The biosecurity level of each farm was assessed using an observation checklist and a biosecurity score. The collected data were analyzed using Stata version 16 for binary data, and QGIS version 3.24.1 was used to map the farms. The results of the study showed that the farms were located close together within 5 km square, 3 km square, and  6 km square areas in Ada’a, Lume, and Adama, respectively. The average distance among the farms was 933.8 meters. The majority of the  farms were located within 100 meters of residential areas. Only 58.8% of the farms had adequate space between sheds; 60.8% did  not have an adequate drainage system. Ninety-eight percent of the farms obtain chicken from certified breeding enterprises; 92.2% provide underground water for their chickens; 80.4% report frequent cleaning and disinfection of farms; and 82.4% disclose vehicle  movement control. Nearly one-third (31.4%) of the farms practice isolation of sick birds but keep them within the same shed where  healthy birds are kept. The assessment of biosecurity levels of the study farms revealed that 23.5% (n=12) of the farms had a good  biosecurity score, while 76.5% (n=39) had a poor score. The biosecurity scores of the farms showed a statistically significant difference  among the study districts (p=0.040), with the Lume district having higher biosecurity scores than Adama and Ada’a districts. The age of  the farm owners was significantly associated with the biosecurity score (p=0.003); all farms (100%) owned by individuals aged 20 - 39 had  good biosecurity scores, and 80% of those farms owned by individuals aged 40 - 59 had good biosecurity. Farms owned by individuals  who have previous chicken-rearing experience had better biosecurity scores than those farms owned by non-experienced owners  (p<0.001). Among the farms having professional consultants, 57.7% of them had good biosecurity scores, whereas only 12.0% of farms  lacking professional consultants had good biosecurity scores (p=0.015). In conclusion, the study revealed that biosecurity measures were  not adequately implemented in poultry farms in central Ethiopia. Farm owners, veterinarians, and livestock authorities must collaborate to implement biosecurity measures to minimize the risk of losses and public health.  ","PeriodicalId":12019,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Veterinary Journal","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biosecurity level assessment in commercial poultry farms of central Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Dejene Tadesse, Zerihun Aseffa, A. Wirtu, T. Sori\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/evj.v28i1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proper biosecurity practice is crucial in poultry farming to reduce the risk of diseases. A study was conducted in Adama, Ada’a, and Lume  districts, central Ethiopia, to assess the biosecurity measures of commercial poultry farms. A total of 51 farms were randomly selected,  and their geographical locations were recorded using GPS devices. The biosecurity level of each farm was assessed using an observation checklist and a biosecurity score. The collected data were analyzed using Stata version 16 for binary data, and QGIS version 3.24.1 was used to map the farms. The results of the study showed that the farms were located close together within 5 km square, 3 km square, and  6 km square areas in Ada’a, Lume, and Adama, respectively. The average distance among the farms was 933.8 meters. The majority of the  farms were located within 100 meters of residential areas. Only 58.8% of the farms had adequate space between sheds; 60.8% did  not have an adequate drainage system. Ninety-eight percent of the farms obtain chicken from certified breeding enterprises; 92.2% provide underground water for their chickens; 80.4% report frequent cleaning and disinfection of farms; and 82.4% disclose vehicle  movement control. Nearly one-third (31.4%) of the farms practice isolation of sick birds but keep them within the same shed where  healthy birds are kept. The assessment of biosecurity levels of the study farms revealed that 23.5% (n=12) of the farms had a good  biosecurity score, while 76.5% (n=39) had a poor score. The biosecurity scores of the farms showed a statistically significant difference  among the study districts (p=0.040), with the Lume district having higher biosecurity scores than Adama and Ada’a districts. The age of  the farm owners was significantly associated with the biosecurity score (p=0.003); all farms (100%) owned by individuals aged 20 - 39 had  good biosecurity scores, and 80% of those farms owned by individuals aged 40 - 59 had good biosecurity. Farms owned by individuals  who have previous chicken-rearing experience had better biosecurity scores than those farms owned by non-experienced owners  (p<0.001). Among the farms having professional consultants, 57.7% of them had good biosecurity scores, whereas only 12.0% of farms  lacking professional consultants had good biosecurity scores (p=0.015). In conclusion, the study revealed that biosecurity measures were  not adequately implemented in poultry farms in central Ethiopia. Farm owners, veterinarians, and livestock authorities must collaborate to implement biosecurity measures to minimize the risk of losses and public health.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":12019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v28i1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v28i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适当的生物安全措施对于家禽养殖业降低疾病风险至关重要。在埃塞俄比亚中部的阿达玛、阿达和卢梅地区开展了一项研究,以评估商业家禽养殖场的生物安全措施。共随机抽取了 51 家农场,并使用 GPS 设备记录了它们的地理位置。使用观察清单和生物安全评分来评估每个农场的生物安全水平。收集到的数据使用 Stata 16 版进行二进制数据分析,并使用 QGIS 3.24.1 版绘制农场地图。研究结果表明,在阿达、卢梅和阿达马,养殖场分别位于 5 平方公里、3 平方公里和 6 平方公里的区域内。农场之间的平均距离为 933.8 米。大多数农场距离居民区不足 100 米。只有 58.8% 的农场的棚舍之间有足够的空间;60.8% 的农场没有足够的排水系统。98% 的养鸡场从经认证的养殖企业购鸡;92.2% 的养鸡场为鸡提供地下水;80.4% 的养鸡场表示经常对养鸡场进行清洁和消毒;82.4% 的养鸡场披露了车辆通行控制措施。近三分之一(31.4%)的鸡场实行病禽隔离,但将病禽与健康禽类关在同一禽舍内。对研究鸡场生物安全水平的评估显示,23.5%(12 家)的鸡场生物安全得分良好, 76.5%(39 家)的鸡场生物安全得分较差。农场的生物安全得分在各研究区之间存在显著差异(P=0.040),卢梅区的生物安全得分高于阿达玛区和阿达阿区。农场主的年龄与生物安全得分显著相关(p=0.003);所有(100%)由 20 - 39 岁人士拥有的农场生物安全得分良好,80%由 40 - 59 岁人士拥有的农场生物安全得分良好。与无养鸡经验的农场主所拥有的农场相比,有养鸡经验的农场主所拥有的农场生物安全得分更高(p<0.001)。在有专业顾问的农场中,57.7% 的农场生物安全得分良好,而在没有专业顾问的农场中,只有 12.0% 的农场生物安全得分良好(p=0.015)。总之,研究表明,埃塞俄比亚中部的家禽养殖场并未充分实施生物安全措施。农场主、兽医和畜牧主管部门必须合作实施生物安全措施,以最大限度地降低损失和公共卫生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biosecurity level assessment in commercial poultry farms of central Ethiopia
Proper biosecurity practice is crucial in poultry farming to reduce the risk of diseases. A study was conducted in Adama, Ada’a, and Lume  districts, central Ethiopia, to assess the biosecurity measures of commercial poultry farms. A total of 51 farms were randomly selected,  and their geographical locations were recorded using GPS devices. The biosecurity level of each farm was assessed using an observation checklist and a biosecurity score. The collected data were analyzed using Stata version 16 for binary data, and QGIS version 3.24.1 was used to map the farms. The results of the study showed that the farms were located close together within 5 km square, 3 km square, and  6 km square areas in Ada’a, Lume, and Adama, respectively. The average distance among the farms was 933.8 meters. The majority of the  farms were located within 100 meters of residential areas. Only 58.8% of the farms had adequate space between sheds; 60.8% did  not have an adequate drainage system. Ninety-eight percent of the farms obtain chicken from certified breeding enterprises; 92.2% provide underground water for their chickens; 80.4% report frequent cleaning and disinfection of farms; and 82.4% disclose vehicle  movement control. Nearly one-third (31.4%) of the farms practice isolation of sick birds but keep them within the same shed where  healthy birds are kept. The assessment of biosecurity levels of the study farms revealed that 23.5% (n=12) of the farms had a good  biosecurity score, while 76.5% (n=39) had a poor score. The biosecurity scores of the farms showed a statistically significant difference  among the study districts (p=0.040), with the Lume district having higher biosecurity scores than Adama and Ada’a districts. The age of  the farm owners was significantly associated with the biosecurity score (p=0.003); all farms (100%) owned by individuals aged 20 - 39 had  good biosecurity scores, and 80% of those farms owned by individuals aged 40 - 59 had good biosecurity. Farms owned by individuals  who have previous chicken-rearing experience had better biosecurity scores than those farms owned by non-experienced owners  (p<0.001). Among the farms having professional consultants, 57.7% of them had good biosecurity scores, whereas only 12.0% of farms  lacking professional consultants had good biosecurity scores (p=0.015). In conclusion, the study revealed that biosecurity measures were  not adequately implemented in poultry farms in central Ethiopia. Farm owners, veterinarians, and livestock authorities must collaborate to implement biosecurity measures to minimize the risk of losses and public health.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identification of major protozoal enteropathogens causing calf diarrhea in dairy farms in and around Holeta Town, Oromia Special Zone, Ethiopia Biosecurity level assessment in commercial poultry farms of central Ethiopia Isolation and identification of Brucella abortus and B. melitensis in ruminants with a history of abortion: the first report from Eritrea Assessment of community knowledge, attitude, and practice towards rabies and its determinants in Kersa District, East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia Dairy village: the role of veterinary services in unlocking dairy industry potential through assisted reproductive technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1