{"title":"将机器学习模型用于肝移植的预后分析:系统综述","authors":"Gidion Chongo, Jonathan Soldera","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the equitable allocation of scarce donor organs remains a formidable challenge. Prognostic tools are pivotal in identifying the most suitable transplant candidates. Traditionally, scoring systems like the model for end-stage liver disease have been instrumental in this process. Nevertheless, the landscape of prognostication is undergoing a transformation with the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence models.\n AIM\n To assess the utility of ML models in prognostication for LT, comparing their performance and reliability to established traditional scoring systems.\n METHODS\n Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a thorough and standardized literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Our search imposed no restrictions on publication year, age, or gender. Exclusion criteria encompassed non-English studies, review articles, case reports, conference papers, studies with missing data, or those exhibiting evident methodological flaws.\n RESULTS\n Our search yielded a total of 64 articles, with 23 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among the selected studies, 60.8% originated from the United States and China combined. Only one pediatric study met the criteria. Notably, 91% of the studies were published within the past five years. ML models consistently demonstrated satisfactory to excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values (ranging from 0.6 to 1) across all studies, surpassing the performance of traditional scoring systems. Random forest exhibited superior predictive capabilities for 90-d mortality following LT, sepsis, and acute kidney injury (AKI). In contrast, gradient boosting excelled in predicting the risk of graft-versus-host disease, pneumonia, and AKI.\n CONCLUSION\n This study underscores the potential of ML models in guiding decisions related to allograft allocation and LT, marking a significant evolution in the field of prognostication.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"342 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of machine learning models for the prognostication of liver transplantation: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Gidion Chongo, Jonathan Soldera\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the equitable allocation of scarce donor organs remains a formidable challenge. Prognostic tools are pivotal in identifying the most suitable transplant candidates. Traditionally, scoring systems like the model for end-stage liver disease have been instrumental in this process. Nevertheless, the landscape of prognostication is undergoing a transformation with the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence models.\\n AIM\\n To assess the utility of ML models in prognostication for LT, comparing their performance and reliability to established traditional scoring systems.\\n METHODS\\n Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a thorough and standardized literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Our search imposed no restrictions on publication year, age, or gender. Exclusion criteria encompassed non-English studies, review articles, case reports, conference papers, studies with missing data, or those exhibiting evident methodological flaws.\\n RESULTS\\n Our search yielded a total of 64 articles, with 23 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among the selected studies, 60.8% originated from the United States and China combined. Only one pediatric study met the criteria. Notably, 91% of the studies were published within the past five years. ML models consistently demonstrated satisfactory to excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values (ranging from 0.6 to 1) across all studies, surpassing the performance of traditional scoring systems. Random forest exhibited superior predictive capabilities for 90-d mortality following LT, sepsis, and acute kidney injury (AKI). In contrast, gradient boosting excelled in predicting the risk of graft-versus-host disease, pneumonia, and AKI.\\n CONCLUSION\\n This study underscores the potential of ML models in guiding decisions related to allograft allocation and LT, marking a significant evolution in the field of prognostication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"342 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景 肝移植(LT)是挽救终末期肝病患者生命的干预措施。然而,如何公平分配稀缺的供体器官仍是一项艰巨的挑战。预后工具对于确定最合适的移植候选者至关重要。传统上,像终末期肝病模型这样的评分系统在这一过程中发挥了重要作用。然而,随着机器学习(ML)和人工智能模型的整合,预后分析的格局正在发生转变。目的 评估 ML 模型在 LT 预后中的实用性,并将其性能和可靠性与已建立的传统评分系统进行比较。方法 按照《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,我们使用 PubMed/MEDLINE 数据库进行了全面、标准化的文献检索。我们的检索对发表年份、年龄或性别没有限制。排除标准包括非英语研究、综述性文章、病例报告、会议论文、数据缺失的研究或存在明显方法缺陷的研究。结果 我们共搜索到 64 篇文章,其中 23 篇符合纳入标准。在入选的研究中,60.8%来自美国和中国。只有一项儿科研究符合标准。值得注意的是,91%的研究是在过去五年内发表的。在所有研究中,ML 模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积值(从 0.6 到 1 不等)一直表现出令人满意到卓越的水平,超过了传统评分系统的表现。随机森林对LT、败血症和急性肾损伤(AKI)后90天死亡率的预测能力更胜一筹。相比之下,梯度提升法在预测移植物抗宿主疾病、肺炎和 AKI 风险方面表现出色。结论 本研究强调了 ML 模型在指导异体移植物分配和 LT 相关决策方面的潜力,标志着预后领域的重大发展。
Use of machine learning models for the prognostication of liver transplantation: A systematic review
BACKGROUND
Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the equitable allocation of scarce donor organs remains a formidable challenge. Prognostic tools are pivotal in identifying the most suitable transplant candidates. Traditionally, scoring systems like the model for end-stage liver disease have been instrumental in this process. Nevertheless, the landscape of prognostication is undergoing a transformation with the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence models.
AIM
To assess the utility of ML models in prognostication for LT, comparing their performance and reliability to established traditional scoring systems.
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a thorough and standardized literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Our search imposed no restrictions on publication year, age, or gender. Exclusion criteria encompassed non-English studies, review articles, case reports, conference papers, studies with missing data, or those exhibiting evident methodological flaws.
RESULTS
Our search yielded a total of 64 articles, with 23 meeting the inclusion criteria. Among the selected studies, 60.8% originated from the United States and China combined. Only one pediatric study met the criteria. Notably, 91% of the studies were published within the past five years. ML models consistently demonstrated satisfactory to excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values (ranging from 0.6 to 1) across all studies, surpassing the performance of traditional scoring systems. Random forest exhibited superior predictive capabilities for 90-d mortality following LT, sepsis, and acute kidney injury (AKI). In contrast, gradient boosting excelled in predicting the risk of graft-versus-host disease, pneumonia, and AKI.
CONCLUSION
This study underscores the potential of ML models in guiding decisions related to allograft allocation and LT, marking a significant evolution in the field of prognostication.