{"title":"吉多-阿德勒论 \"音乐学 \"一词","authors":"Malik Sharif","doi":"10.52412/mf.2024.h1.3124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guido Adler’s choice of the term “Musikologie” (“musicology”) as the preferred synonym of “Vergleichende Musikwissenschaft” (literally “comparative science of music”), a sub-section of the overall discipline of “Musikwissenschaft” (“science of music”), in his 1885 article “Umfang, Methode und Ziel der Musikwissenschaft” (“The scope, method and aim of musicology”) is puzzling and confusing. Situating Adler’s usage in terminological history of “Musikologie” in several European languages, this article discusses four hypotheses that seek to explain his choice of “Musikologie”: (1.) as a terminological lapse, (2.) as signifying the subdiscipline’s scientific nature, (3.) as caused by outside influence, and (4.) as inspired by hearsay and half-knowledge of Franjo Kuhač’s simultaneous terminological choice. The hypotheses have different degrees of plausibility and consistency, but no explanation emerges clearly as the single most obvious one.","PeriodicalId":505875,"journal":{"name":"Die Musikforschung","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zur Bezeichnung „Musikologie“ bei Guido Adler\",\"authors\":\"Malik Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.52412/mf.2024.h1.3124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Guido Adler’s choice of the term “Musikologie” (“musicology”) as the preferred synonym of “Vergleichende Musikwissenschaft” (literally “comparative science of music”), a sub-section of the overall discipline of “Musikwissenschaft” (“science of music”), in his 1885 article “Umfang, Methode und Ziel der Musikwissenschaft” (“The scope, method and aim of musicology”) is puzzling and confusing. Situating Adler’s usage in terminological history of “Musikologie” in several European languages, this article discusses four hypotheses that seek to explain his choice of “Musikologie”: (1.) as a terminological lapse, (2.) as signifying the subdiscipline’s scientific nature, (3.) as caused by outside influence, and (4.) as inspired by hearsay and half-knowledge of Franjo Kuhač’s simultaneous terminological choice. The hypotheses have different degrees of plausibility and consistency, but no explanation emerges clearly as the single most obvious one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Musikforschung\",\"volume\":\"2 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Musikforschung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52412/mf.2024.h1.3124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Musikforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52412/mf.2024.h1.3124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Guido Adler 在其 1885 年发表的文章 "Umfang, Methode und Ziel der Musikwissenschaft"("音乐学的范围、方法和目的")中选择了 "Musikologie"("音乐学")一词作为 "Vergleichende Musikwissenschaft"(字面意思为 "音乐比较科学")的首选同义词,而 "Vergleichende Musikwissenschaft "是 "Musikwissenschaft"("音乐科学")这门总体学科的一个分支,这一点令人费解和困惑。本文以阿德勒在 "Musikologie "一词的几种欧洲语言术语史中的使用为背景,讨论了四种假设,试图解释他对 "Musikologie "一词的选择:(1.) 术语失误;(2.) 表示该分支学科的科学性;(3.) 受外部影响;(4.) 受道听途说和对弗兰霍-库哈奇同时选择术语的一知半解的启发。这些假设具有不同程度的可信性和一致性,但没有一种解释是最明显的。
Guido Adler’s choice of the term “Musikologie” (“musicology”) as the preferred synonym of “Vergleichende Musikwissenschaft” (literally “comparative science of music”), a sub-section of the overall discipline of “Musikwissenschaft” (“science of music”), in his 1885 article “Umfang, Methode und Ziel der Musikwissenschaft” (“The scope, method and aim of musicology”) is puzzling and confusing. Situating Adler’s usage in terminological history of “Musikologie” in several European languages, this article discusses four hypotheses that seek to explain his choice of “Musikologie”: (1.) as a terminological lapse, (2.) as signifying the subdiscipline’s scientific nature, (3.) as caused by outside influence, and (4.) as inspired by hearsay and half-knowledge of Franjo Kuhač’s simultaneous terminological choice. The hypotheses have different degrees of plausibility and consistency, but no explanation emerges clearly as the single most obvious one.