Melina Utz Melere, Valberto Sanha, Marco Farina, Carolina Soares da Silva, Luiza Nader, C. Trein, Angelica Maria Lucchese, Cristina Ferreira, A. N. Kalil, F. H. Feier
{"title":"胆道闭锁儿童的原发性肝移植与卡萨伊造口术后移植:巴西单中心队列回顾性研究","authors":"Melina Utz Melere, Valberto Sanha, Marco Farina, Carolina Soares da Silva, Luiza Nader, C. Trein, Angelica Maria Lucchese, Cristina Ferreira, A. N. Kalil, F. H. Feier","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation, although portoenterostomy is usually performed first. However, due to the high failure rate of portoenterostomy, liver transplantation has been advocated as the primary procedure for patients with BA. It is still unclear if a previous portoenterostomy has a negative impact on liver transplantation outcomes.\n AIM\n To investigate the effect of prior portoenterostomy in infants undergoing liver transplantation for BA.\n METHODS\n This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 pediatric patients with BA who underwent primary liver transplantation from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center in Brazil. Patients with BA were divided into two groups: Those undergoing primary liver transplantation without portoenterostomy and those undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t -test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for portal vein thrombosis. Patient and graft survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan–Meier product-limit estimator, and patient subgroups were compared using the two-sided log-rank test.\n RESULTS\n Forty-two patients were included in the study (25 [60%] girls), 23 undergoing liver transplantation without prior portoenterostomy, and 19 undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Patients with prior portoenterostomy were older (12 vs 8 mo; P = 0.02) at the time of liver transplantation and had lower Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (13.2 vs 21.4; P = 0.01). The majority of the patients (35/42, 83%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation. The group of patients without prior portoenterostomy appeared to have a higher incidence of portal vein thrombosis (39 vs 11%), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Prior portoenterostomy was not a protective factor against portal vein thrombosis in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for age at liver transplantation, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and use of vascular grafts. Finally, the groups did not significantly differ in terms of post-transplant survival.\n CONCLUSION\n In our study, prior portoenterostomy did not significantly affect the outcomes of liver transplantation.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"267 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary liver transplantation vs transplant after Kasai portoenterostomy in children with biliary atresia: A retrospective Brazilian single-center cohort\",\"authors\":\"Melina Utz Melere, Valberto Sanha, Marco Farina, Carolina Soares da Silva, Luiza Nader, C. Trein, Angelica Maria Lucchese, Cristina Ferreira, A. N. Kalil, F. H. Feier\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation, although portoenterostomy is usually performed first. However, due to the high failure rate of portoenterostomy, liver transplantation has been advocated as the primary procedure for patients with BA. It is still unclear if a previous portoenterostomy has a negative impact on liver transplantation outcomes.\\n AIM\\n To investigate the effect of prior portoenterostomy in infants undergoing liver transplantation for BA.\\n METHODS\\n This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 pediatric patients with BA who underwent primary liver transplantation from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center in Brazil. Patients with BA were divided into two groups: Those undergoing primary liver transplantation without portoenterostomy and those undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t -test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for portal vein thrombosis. Patient and graft survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan–Meier product-limit estimator, and patient subgroups were compared using the two-sided log-rank test.\\n RESULTS\\n Forty-two patients were included in the study (25 [60%] girls), 23 undergoing liver transplantation without prior portoenterostomy, and 19 undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Patients with prior portoenterostomy were older (12 vs 8 mo; P = 0.02) at the time of liver transplantation and had lower Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (13.2 vs 21.4; P = 0.01). The majority of the patients (35/42, 83%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation. The group of patients without prior portoenterostomy appeared to have a higher incidence of portal vein thrombosis (39 vs 11%), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Prior portoenterostomy was not a protective factor against portal vein thrombosis in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for age at liver transplantation, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and use of vascular grafts. Finally, the groups did not significantly differ in terms of post-transplant survival.\\n CONCLUSION\\n In our study, prior portoenterostomy did not significantly affect the outcomes of liver transplantation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"267 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.88734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景胆道闭锁(BA)是小儿肝移植最常见的适应症,尽管通常先进行肠管造口术。然而,由于肠管造口术的失败率较高,肝移植已被提倡作为 BA 患者的主要手术。目前尚不清楚之前的肠造口术是否会对肝移植结果产生负面影响。目的 研究因 BA 而接受肝移植的婴儿既往接受过肠管造口术的影响。方法 这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2013 年至 2023 年期间在巴西一家三级医疗中心接受初级肝移植手术的 42 例 BA 儿科患者。BA 患者分为两组:未接受肠造口术的原发性肝移植患者和曾接受肠造口术的肝移植患者。连续变量的比较采用学生 t 检验或 Kruskal-Wallis 检验,分类变量的比较采用 χ 2 检验或费雪精确检验(视情况而定)。进行多变量 Cox 回归分析以确定门静脉血栓形成的风险因素。患者和移植物存活率分析采用 Kaplan-Meier 乘积限制估计法,患者亚组比较采用双侧对数秩检验。结果 研究共纳入 42 名患者(25 名[60%]为女孩),其中 23 名患者在接受肝移植手术前未进行肠管造口术,19 名患者在接受肝移植手术前进行了肠管造口术。接受过肠管造口术的患者在接受肝移植时年龄较大(12 个月 vs 8 个月;P = 0.02),儿科终末期肝病评分较低(13.2 分 vs 21.4 分;P = 0.01)。大多数患者(35/42,83%)接受了活体肝移植。未进行过肠管造口术的患者中,门静脉血栓形成的发生率似乎更高(39 比 11%),但这一结果在统计学上没有显著性。在对肝移植时的年龄、移植物与受体的体重比以及血管移植物的使用情况进行调整后,进行过肠管造口术的患者在多变量分析中并不是门静脉血栓形成的保护因素。最后,两组患者在移植后存活率方面没有明显差异。结论 在我们的研究中,先前的肠造口术对肝移植的结果没有明显影响。
Primary liver transplantation vs transplant after Kasai portoenterostomy in children with biliary atresia: A retrospective Brazilian single-center cohort
BACKGROUND
Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indication for pediatric liver transplantation, although portoenterostomy is usually performed first. However, due to the high failure rate of portoenterostomy, liver transplantation has been advocated as the primary procedure for patients with BA. It is still unclear if a previous portoenterostomy has a negative impact on liver transplantation outcomes.
AIM
To investigate the effect of prior portoenterostomy in infants undergoing liver transplantation for BA.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort study of 42 pediatric patients with BA who underwent primary liver transplantation from 2013 to 2023 at a single tertiary center in Brazil. Patients with BA were divided into two groups: Those undergoing primary liver transplantation without portoenterostomy and those undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t -test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for portal vein thrombosis. Patient and graft survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan–Meier product-limit estimator, and patient subgroups were compared using the two-sided log-rank test.
RESULTS
Forty-two patients were included in the study (25 [60%] girls), 23 undergoing liver transplantation without prior portoenterostomy, and 19 undergoing liver transplantation with prior portoenterostomy. Patients with prior portoenterostomy were older (12 vs 8 mo; P = 0.02) at the time of liver transplantation and had lower Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease scores (13.2 vs 21.4; P = 0.01). The majority of the patients (35/42, 83%) underwent living-donor liver transplantation. The group of patients without prior portoenterostomy appeared to have a higher incidence of portal vein thrombosis (39 vs 11%), but this result did not reach statistical significance. Prior portoenterostomy was not a protective factor against portal vein thrombosis in the multivariable analysis after adjusting for age at liver transplantation, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, and use of vascular grafts. Finally, the groups did not significantly differ in terms of post-transplant survival.
CONCLUSION
In our study, prior portoenterostomy did not significantly affect the outcomes of liver transplantation.