后续全关节成形术:我们从第一阶段学到了什么?

Christine J. Wu, Colin T. Penrose, Sean P. Ryan, M. Bolognesi, T. Seyler, S. Wellman
{"title":"后续全关节成形术:我们从第一阶段学到了什么?","authors":"Christine J. Wu, Colin T. Penrose, Sean P. Ryan, M. Bolognesi, T. Seyler, S. Wellman","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n With the increasing incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), there is a desire to reduce peri-operative complications and resource utilization. As degenerative conditions progress in multiple joints, many patients undergo multiple procedures.\n AIM\n To determine if both physicians and patients learn from the patient’s initial arthroplasty, resulting in improved outcomes following the second procedure.\n METHODS\n The institutional database was retrospectively queried for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients with only unilateral THA or TKA, and patients undergoing same-day bilateral TJA, were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and implant sizes were collected at the time of each procedure and patients were stratified by first vs second surgery. Outcome metrics evaluated included operative time, length of stay (LOS), disposition, 90-d readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits.\n RESULTS\n A total of 642 patients, including 364 undergoing staged bilateral TKA and 278 undergoing bilateral THA, were analyzed. There was no significant difference in demographics or comorbidities between the first and second procedure, which were separated by a mean of 285 d. For THA and TKA, LOS was significantly less for the second surgery, with 66% of patients having a shorter hospitalization (P < 0.001). THA patients had significantly decreased operative time only when the same sized implant was utilized (P = 0.025). The vast majority (93.3%) of patients were discharged to the same type of location following their second surgery. However, when a change in disposition was present from the first surgery, patients were significantly more likely to be discharged to home after the second procedure (P = 0.033). There was no difference between procedures for post-operative readmissions (P = 0.438) or ED visits (P = 0.915).\n CONCLUSION\n After gaining valuable experience recovering from the initial surgery, a patient’s perioperative outcomes are improved for their second TJA. This may be the result of increased confidence and decreased anxiety, and it supports the theory that enhanced patient education pre-operatively may improve outcomes. For the surgical team, the second procedure of a staged THA is more efficient, although this finding did not hold for TKA.","PeriodicalId":506838,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"209 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subsequent total joint arthroplasty: Are we learning from the first stage?\",\"authors\":\"Christine J. Wu, Colin T. Penrose, Sean P. Ryan, M. Bolognesi, T. Seyler, S. Wellman\",\"doi\":\"10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n With the increasing incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), there is a desire to reduce peri-operative complications and resource utilization. As degenerative conditions progress in multiple joints, many patients undergo multiple procedures.\\n AIM\\n To determine if both physicians and patients learn from the patient’s initial arthroplasty, resulting in improved outcomes following the second procedure.\\n METHODS\\n The institutional database was retrospectively queried for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients with only unilateral THA or TKA, and patients undergoing same-day bilateral TJA, were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and implant sizes were collected at the time of each procedure and patients were stratified by first vs second surgery. Outcome metrics evaluated included operative time, length of stay (LOS), disposition, 90-d readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits.\\n RESULTS\\n A total of 642 patients, including 364 undergoing staged bilateral TKA and 278 undergoing bilateral THA, were analyzed. There was no significant difference in demographics or comorbidities between the first and second procedure, which were separated by a mean of 285 d. For THA and TKA, LOS was significantly less for the second surgery, with 66% of patients having a shorter hospitalization (P < 0.001). THA patients had significantly decreased operative time only when the same sized implant was utilized (P = 0.025). The vast majority (93.3%) of patients were discharged to the same type of location following their second surgery. However, when a change in disposition was present from the first surgery, patients were significantly more likely to be discharged to home after the second procedure (P = 0.033). There was no difference between procedures for post-operative readmissions (P = 0.438) or ED visits (P = 0.915).\\n CONCLUSION\\n After gaining valuable experience recovering from the initial surgery, a patient’s perioperative outcomes are improved for their second TJA. This may be the result of increased confidence and decreased anxiety, and it supports the theory that enhanced patient education pre-operatively may improve outcomes. For the surgical team, the second procedure of a staged THA is more efficient, although this finding did not hold for TKA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"209 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 随着全关节成形术(TJA)的发病率越来越高,人们希望减少围手术期并发症和资源利用率。随着多关节退行性病变的发展,许多患者需要接受多次手术。目的 确定医生和患者是否都能从患者的初次关节置换术中吸取教训,从而改善第二次手术的疗效。方法 对机构数据库中的初次全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)进行回顾性查询。排除了仅接受单侧 THA 或 TKA 的患者以及当天接受双侧 TJA 的患者。在每次手术时收集患者的人口统计学资料、合并症和植入物尺寸,并按首次手术和第二次手术对患者进行分层。评估的结果指标包括手术时间、住院时间(LOS)、处置情况、90 天后再入院情况和急诊就诊情况。结果 共对 642 名患者进行了分析,其中包括 364 名接受分期双侧 TKA 的患者和 278 名接受双侧 THA 的患者。THA和TKA患者第二次手术的住院时间明显缩短,66%的患者住院时间更短(P<0.001)。THA 患者只有在使用相同大小的植入物时,手术时间才会明显缩短(P = 0.025)。绝大多数患者(93.3%)在第二次手术后出院到了同类地点。但是,如果第一次手术后患者的处置发生了变化,那么第二次手术后患者出院回家的可能性就会明显增加(P = 0.033)。不同手术的术后再入院率(P = 0.438)和急诊就诊率(P = 0.915)没有差异。结论 从首次手术中获得宝贵的恢复经验后,患者第二次接受 TJA 手术的围手术期结果会有所改善。这可能是信心增强、焦虑减少的结果,也支持了加强术前患者教育可改善预后的理论。对于手术团队来说,分期 THA 的第二次手术效率更高,但这一结论在 TKA 中并不成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Subsequent total joint arthroplasty: Are we learning from the first stage?
BACKGROUND With the increasing incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), there is a desire to reduce peri-operative complications and resource utilization. As degenerative conditions progress in multiple joints, many patients undergo multiple procedures. AIM To determine if both physicians and patients learn from the patient’s initial arthroplasty, resulting in improved outcomes following the second procedure. METHODS The institutional database was retrospectively queried for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients with only unilateral THA or TKA, and patients undergoing same-day bilateral TJA, were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and implant sizes were collected at the time of each procedure and patients were stratified by first vs second surgery. Outcome metrics evaluated included operative time, length of stay (LOS), disposition, 90-d readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS A total of 642 patients, including 364 undergoing staged bilateral TKA and 278 undergoing bilateral THA, were analyzed. There was no significant difference in demographics or comorbidities between the first and second procedure, which were separated by a mean of 285 d. For THA and TKA, LOS was significantly less for the second surgery, with 66% of patients having a shorter hospitalization (P < 0.001). THA patients had significantly decreased operative time only when the same sized implant was utilized (P = 0.025). The vast majority (93.3%) of patients were discharged to the same type of location following their second surgery. However, when a change in disposition was present from the first surgery, patients were significantly more likely to be discharged to home after the second procedure (P = 0.033). There was no difference between procedures for post-operative readmissions (P = 0.438) or ED visits (P = 0.915). CONCLUSION After gaining valuable experience recovering from the initial surgery, a patient’s perioperative outcomes are improved for their second TJA. This may be the result of increased confidence and decreased anxiety, and it supports the theory that enhanced patient education pre-operatively may improve outcomes. For the surgical team, the second procedure of a staged THA is more efficient, although this finding did not hold for TKA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and associated factors of clubfoot in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia: A hospital-based study Smoking cessation prior to elective total joint arthroplasty results in sustained abstinence postoperatively Arthroscopic M-shaped suture fixation for tibia avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament: A modified technique and case series Epidemiology of work-related hand and wrist injuries in a referral center: A descriptive study Intraoperative application of three-dimensional printed guides in total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1