含氯或不含氯的生物安全饮用水:综述

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Blue-Green Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.2166/bgs.2024.008
Di Wang, A. Ren, Mingchen Yao, Bin Hu, Walter van der Meer, Gang Liu
{"title":"含氯或不含氯的生物安全饮用水:综述","authors":"Di Wang, A. Ren, Mingchen Yao, Bin Hu, Walter van der Meer, Gang Liu","doi":"10.2166/bgs.2024.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drinking water biosafety has become an increasing concern for public health. Chlorination is widely used as the main disinfection strategy worldwide but has clear and well-known byproduct issues. The Netherlands has successfully demonstrated unchlorinated approach for almost 20 years but has not been widely adopted by other countries. To chlorine or not chlorine is becoming a critical question in front of all the water utilities. This review aims to provide a good overview of current biosafety management strategies, their disadvantages, as well as the latest developments and future trends. Firstly, the advantages and deficiencies of conventional disinfection and non-disinfection were discussed. Secondly, the commonly used and promising methods for biostability assessment are described. Finally, critical views on the strategy selection for ensuring drinking water biosafety were discussed. It is recommended to achieve both biological and chemical balance by removing pathogens while minimizing the organic matter and dosing a minimum level of disinfectants, which would represent the compromise choice between the current chlorine-based disinfection and chlorine-free strategy. It's worth noting that the complexity of ensuring biosafety lies in the variations among different regions, the selection of suitable methods should be tailored to specific situations on a case-by-case basis.","PeriodicalId":9337,"journal":{"name":"Blue-Green Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bio-safe drinking water with or without chlorine: a review\",\"authors\":\"Di Wang, A. Ren, Mingchen Yao, Bin Hu, Walter van der Meer, Gang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/bgs.2024.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Drinking water biosafety has become an increasing concern for public health. Chlorination is widely used as the main disinfection strategy worldwide but has clear and well-known byproduct issues. The Netherlands has successfully demonstrated unchlorinated approach for almost 20 years but has not been widely adopted by other countries. To chlorine or not chlorine is becoming a critical question in front of all the water utilities. This review aims to provide a good overview of current biosafety management strategies, their disadvantages, as well as the latest developments and future trends. Firstly, the advantages and deficiencies of conventional disinfection and non-disinfection were discussed. Secondly, the commonly used and promising methods for biostability assessment are described. Finally, critical views on the strategy selection for ensuring drinking water biosafety were discussed. It is recommended to achieve both biological and chemical balance by removing pathogens while minimizing the organic matter and dosing a minimum level of disinfectants, which would represent the compromise choice between the current chlorine-based disinfection and chlorine-free strategy. It's worth noting that the complexity of ensuring biosafety lies in the variations among different regions, the selection of suitable methods should be tailored to specific situations on a case-by-case basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blue-Green Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blue-Green Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2024.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blue-Green Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2024.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

饮用水生物安全已成为公众健康日益关注的问题。氯化作为主要的消毒策略在世界范围内被广泛使用,但其副产品问题也是众所周知的。荷兰在近 20 年的时间里成功示范了无氯消毒方法,但其他国家并未广泛采用。加氯还是不加氯正成为摆在所有水务公司面前的一个关键问题。本综述旨在对当前的生物安全管理策略、其缺点以及最新进展和未来趋势提供一个很好的概述。首先,讨论了传统消毒和非消毒的优势和不足。其次,介绍了常用的和有前途的生物稳定性评估方法。最后,讨论了确保饮用水生物安全的策略选择方面的重要观点。建议在去除病原体的同时尽量减少有机物,并投加最低水平的消毒剂,从而实现生物和化学平衡,这将是目前基于氯的消毒和无氯策略之间的折中选择。值得注意的是,确保生物安全的复杂性在于不同地区之间的差异,应根据具体情况逐一选择合适的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bio-safe drinking water with or without chlorine: a review
Drinking water biosafety has become an increasing concern for public health. Chlorination is widely used as the main disinfection strategy worldwide but has clear and well-known byproduct issues. The Netherlands has successfully demonstrated unchlorinated approach for almost 20 years but has not been widely adopted by other countries. To chlorine or not chlorine is becoming a critical question in front of all the water utilities. This review aims to provide a good overview of current biosafety management strategies, their disadvantages, as well as the latest developments and future trends. Firstly, the advantages and deficiencies of conventional disinfection and non-disinfection were discussed. Secondly, the commonly used and promising methods for biostability assessment are described. Finally, critical views on the strategy selection for ensuring drinking water biosafety were discussed. It is recommended to achieve both biological and chemical balance by removing pathogens while minimizing the organic matter and dosing a minimum level of disinfectants, which would represent the compromise choice between the current chlorine-based disinfection and chlorine-free strategy. It's worth noting that the complexity of ensuring biosafety lies in the variations among different regions, the selection of suitable methods should be tailored to specific situations on a case-by-case basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blue-Green Systems
Blue-Green Systems Multiple-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An integrated framework for waterfront development to recognize nature-based solution (NBS) in urban areas: evaluating the condition of two projects in Bangladesh From shower to table: fate of organic micropollutants in hydroponic systems for greywater treatment and lettuce cultivation Modelling urban stormwater and irrigation management with coupled blue-green infrastructure in the context of climate change Life cycle assessment of ammonium sulfate recovery from urban wastewater Bio-safe drinking water with or without chlorine: a review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1