利用机器学习方法对 TIGGE 组合数据的后处理方法进行性能评估和验证

Anant Patel, S. M. Yadav
{"title":"利用机器学习方法对 TIGGE 组合数据的后处理方法进行性能评估和验证","authors":"Anant Patel, S. M. Yadav","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2024.563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Ensemble modelling has become a significant technique in the field of machine learning, as it utilises the combined knowledge of multiple base models to improve the accuracy of predictions in different domains. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of ensemble predictions relies on the implementation of post-processing techniques that enhance and optimize the outputs of the ensemble. This study explores the domain of ensemble data post-processing, utilizing a machine learning-focused methodology to thoroughly assess and contrast a variety of post-processing methods. TIGGE Ensemble data from ECMWF and NCEP were used from 2010 to 2020. Research covers machine learning approaches post-processing methods such as BMA, cNLR, HXLR, OLR, logreg, hlogreg, QM were applied. The probabilistic forecasts were validated using the Brier Score (BS), Area Under Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) plots and reliability plots. The cNLR and BMA strategies for post-processing performed exceptionally well with BS value of 0.10 and RPS value of 0.11 at all grid points for both methods. The ROC–AUC values for the cNLR and BMA methods were found to be 91.87 and 91.82%, respectively. The results show that improved post-processing techniques can be helpful to predict the flood in advance with accurate precision and warning.","PeriodicalId":506949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","volume":"32 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation and verification of post-processing methods for TIGGE ensemble data using machine learning approaches\",\"authors\":\"Anant Patel, S. M. Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/wcc.2024.563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Ensemble modelling has become a significant technique in the field of machine learning, as it utilises the combined knowledge of multiple base models to improve the accuracy of predictions in different domains. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of ensemble predictions relies on the implementation of post-processing techniques that enhance and optimize the outputs of the ensemble. This study explores the domain of ensemble data post-processing, utilizing a machine learning-focused methodology to thoroughly assess and contrast a variety of post-processing methods. TIGGE Ensemble data from ECMWF and NCEP were used from 2010 to 2020. Research covers machine learning approaches post-processing methods such as BMA, cNLR, HXLR, OLR, logreg, hlogreg, QM were applied. The probabilistic forecasts were validated using the Brier Score (BS), Area Under Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) plots and reliability plots. The cNLR and BMA strategies for post-processing performed exceptionally well with BS value of 0.10 and RPS value of 0.11 at all grid points for both methods. The ROC–AUC values for the cNLR and BMA methods were found to be 91.87 and 91.82%, respectively. The results show that improved post-processing techniques can be helpful to predict the flood in advance with accurate precision and warning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water and Climate Change\",\"volume\":\"32 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water and Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

集合建模已成为机器学习领域的一项重要技术,因为它利用多个基础模型的综合知识来提高不同领域预测的准确性。然而,集合预测的有效性有赖于后处理技术的实施,以增强和优化集合的输出。本研究探讨了集合数据后处理领域,利用以机器学习为重点的方法,对各种后处理方法进行了全面评估和对比。研究使用了来自 ECMWF 和 NCEP 的 2010 至 2020 年 TIGGE 集合数据。研究涵盖机器学习后处理方法,如 BMA、cNLR、HXLR、OLR、logreg、hlogreg、QM。使用 Brier Score (BS)、Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) 图的曲线下面积 (AUC) 和可靠性图对概率预测进行了验证。用于后处理的 cNLR 和 BMA 策略表现优异,两种方法在所有网格点的 BS 值均为 0.10,RPS 值均为 0.11。cNLR 和 BMA 方法的 ROC-AUC 值分别为 91.87% 和 91.82%。结果表明,改进的后处理技术有助于提前预测洪水,并提供准确的精度和预警。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance evaluation and verification of post-processing methods for TIGGE ensemble data using machine learning approaches
Ensemble modelling has become a significant technique in the field of machine learning, as it utilises the combined knowledge of multiple base models to improve the accuracy of predictions in different domains. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of ensemble predictions relies on the implementation of post-processing techniques that enhance and optimize the outputs of the ensemble. This study explores the domain of ensemble data post-processing, utilizing a machine learning-focused methodology to thoroughly assess and contrast a variety of post-processing methods. TIGGE Ensemble data from ECMWF and NCEP were used from 2010 to 2020. Research covers machine learning approaches post-processing methods such as BMA, cNLR, HXLR, OLR, logreg, hlogreg, QM were applied. The probabilistic forecasts were validated using the Brier Score (BS), Area Under Curve (AUC) of Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) plots and reliability plots. The cNLR and BMA strategies for post-processing performed exceptionally well with BS value of 0.10 and RPS value of 0.11 at all grid points for both methods. The ROC–AUC values for the cNLR and BMA methods were found to be 91.87 and 91.82%, respectively. The results show that improved post-processing techniques can be helpful to predict the flood in advance with accurate precision and warning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bed shear stress distribution across a meander path Impact of El Niño, Indian Ocean dipole, and Madden–Julian oscillation on land surface temperature in Kuching City Sarawak, during the periods of 1997/1998 and 2015/2016: a pilot study Comprehensive economic losses assessment of storm surge disasters using open data: a case study of Zhoushan, China Determination of the effects of irrigation with recycled wastewater and biochar treatments on crop and soil properties in maize cultivation Determination of climate change impacts on Mediterranean streamflows: a case study of Edremit Eybek Creek, Türkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1