{"title":"人还是专利,发明人还是所有人:为什么最高法院在 Thaler 一案中关于人工智能和发明的判决对所有知识产权都意义重大?","authors":"Johanna Gibson","doi":"10.4337/qmjip.2024.01.00","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"71 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"People or patents, inventors or owners: why the Supreme Court decision on artificial intelligence and invention in Thaler is significant for all intellectual property\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/qmjip.2024.01.00\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"71 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.01.00\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2024.01.00","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
People or patents, inventors or owners: why the Supreme Court decision on artificial intelligence and invention in Thaler is significant for all intellectual property