延迟的启示:福音派的想象力与美国白人基督教的衰落

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.1111/jacc.13532
Ken Paradis, Andrew Connolly
{"title":"延迟的启示:福音派的想象力与美国白人基督教的衰落","authors":"Ken Paradis,&nbsp;Andrew Connolly","doi":"10.1111/jacc.13532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two decades ago, in the years on either side of the turn of the millennium, American evangelical culture (i.e., White evangelical culture) was at the apex of its cultural influence and demographic reach, and a certain sense of immanent Apocalypse or victorious revelation of a righteous new order was in the air. There was a sense that America had badly lost its way and that people of faith were being persecuted in this society now under the spell of secular humanism, but that revival was happening and the tide was turning. Since the 1970s, the evangelical subculture had coalesced within a coherent mediasphere that reflected the world back to them in the image of their faith, huge church complexes had sprouted up across suburbia, the Christian Right had given the silent majority a powerful political voice, and sophisticated parachurch organizations such as Focus on the Family were shaping public discourse around key moral ideas. Evangelical girls were embracing their God-given purity, evangelical men were discovering the divine truth of their wild-at-heart masculinity and evangelicals young and old were reveling in thrillers that dramatized the sense that the end of days was at hand and ultimate victory was imminent. A contract with America had been forged to return the nation to its truth, an evangelical president was in the White House leading a crusade against savage infidels who hated America for its freedom, and a Joshua Generation of homeschooled evangelical children had begun to emerge, to finish the blessed reconquest of their nation.</p><p>But over the past two decades, that sweet sense of immanent political, cultural, and eschatological triumph has soured. Geopolitical crusades bogged down, purity culture femininity and heroic Christian masculinity collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions in a changing culture, and instead of carrying the banner of cultural conquest the younger generation of White evangelicals have increasingly questioned their elders' priorities and the church itself. The narrative of national decline and evangelical resistance in the face of persecution and oppression had been powerfully mobilizing during the period when it was easy to believe that the decline would soon be reversed, but it acquired a different valence in the period when the dream of the restoration of a White Christian America started to seem less and less possible, at least within the framework of democratic politics and existing institutions. In the wake of America's first Black President, homosexual marriage becoming law of the land, the #MeToo, #ChurchToo, and Black Lives Matter movements, as well as the ascension of Donald Trump, members of the social and political formation Robert Jones calls “White Christian America” increasingly articulated their anxieties around declining influence in new formations of politicized faith structured not around church basement prayer groups, but around Fox News and Facebook, YouTube, Gab, Parler, and Telegram, as well as a dense ecosystem of pundits, influencers and podcasting prophets.</p><p>This special issue explores what happened to the cultural seeds that were planted in the triumphal moment of White evangelical America, but that ripened in the grim climate of the Obama/Trump periods and fruited, arguably, in the reactionary Christian authoritarianism on display at the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. It looks at what happens when social and “alternative” media offering visions of reality that better conform to the culture's desires and anxieties supplant the local church as a primary filter for faith and fellowship. It looks at what happens when various conspiritualisms (conspiracy + spirituality) appropriate the imaginative resources of evangelical Apocalypticism, making evangelical culture the primary vector for the widespread adoption of conspiratorial ideation within a conservative movement that now centrally understands itself via the trope of embattlement. It looks at what happens when the political agenda favored by a majority of White evangelicals triumphs even while this agenda is increasingly recognized as something that can only be achieved via minoritarian distortions of the electoral system or by overt resistance to traditional political institutions and mechanisms.</p><p>Using Moral Foundations Theory, Christopher Douglas looks at how two novels represent two different sets of moral priorities within contemporary evangelicalism. <i>The Shack</i> “stresses the values of care and fairness-as-equality,” while the <i>Left Behind</i> series, and particularly <i>Glorious Appearing</i> “depends on values of loyalty, authority, sanctity, and fairness-as-reciprocity.” The contrast points to the diversity within evangelicalism. Diversity within Evangelicalism does not always mean that there is room for liberal voices. As Jenny Van Houdt suggests, an apocalyptic narrative functions as an effective mobilizing concept that draws together not just different kinds of evangelicals, but different kinds of White conservatives. Fear is packaged in a way that members of diverse ideological commitments become allies with a common, liberal enemy, leading to actions like the January 6 insurrection. Vilifying liberal ideals is a common theme in two other papers as well. Neall Pogue looks at how evangelicals' view of nature shifted away from the predominant acceptance of a stewardship model in the 1970s and 1980s toward what had previously been a minority position, depicting nature, almost uniformly since the early 1990s as something that had to be struggled with, overcome, and brought into the service of human goals, aspirations, and commercial interests. As environmentalists began to challenge these ideas, conservative evangelicals responded by framing those environmentalists and their policies as threats, making environmental concerns a battleground in the ongoing Culture Wars. Jacob Cook examines another significant target in the Culture Wars: Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Intersectionality. Cook points out that evangelicals draw on the rhetoric of “worldviews” to help group proponents of CRT with other liberal projects. Worldview language, argues Cook, motivates conservative evangelicals to oppose critical theory, rather than reflect on potentially damaging policies and practices within their own ranks. The result, as Cook concludes, is that some evangelicals are alienated from a larger, predominantly White evangelical culture.</p><p>This issue also explores evidence that the crises of the past decades—including the difficult confrontations with histories of racism, sexual abuse, and homophobia—have spawned new forms of culture among people with roots in evangelical traditions, both among people who now identify as “ex-vangelical” and among those who want to continue in some version of their faith tradition even if unwilling—or feeling unwelcome—to identify as “evangelical.” It explores the cultural anxieties and faith-informed aspirations attendant on the demographic decline of “White Christian America” in the past two decades that are manifest in the products and discourses that contemporary North American Evangelical culture and its offshoots produce and consume.</p><p>Matthew Mullins examines someone who became a voice for exvangelicals. Singer songwriter David Bazan was a successful evangelical rock star, but he began to question evangelical theology, and just as importantly, the deep connection between evangelicals and conservative politics in the United States. Mullins analyzes the way these doubts began to appear in Bazan's music and chronicles his eventual departure from evangelicalism, even though that faith tradition still informs much of Bazan's life and music. Isaac Sharp chronicles the exodus of another evangelical musician, Christian rap artist Lecrae. Lecrae enjoyed significant popularity within the largely white evangelical cultural community until he began to speak out against racial violence following the death of Trayvon Martin in 2012. The backlash he experienced led him to realize that he was not welcome in the evangelical cultural community, and ultimately ceased considering himself an evangelical. Sharp suggests that Lecrae's departure is representative of a larger alienation of Black evangelicals within the White evangelical cultural community. Melodie Roschman examines another group that has been alienated by the evangelical church: trans people. Roschman focuses on trans author Daniel M. Lavery's 2020 memoir <i>Something That May Shock and Discredit You</i>. While the memoir chronicles his difficult childhood in the church, Roschman argues that it subverts the conventions of both trans memoir and evangelical conversion stories. In particular, Rochman looks at the way Lavery reimagines and remixes Biblical stories as a way of coming to terms with his evangelical upbringing and recuperating part of his past. Like Bazan, Lavery acknowledges the continuing influence of evangelicalism in his life but strives to reframe it in a way that compliments his trans identity.</p><p>These two groups of papers may appear to set up a dichotomy: a conservative, white evangelical community that actively combats perceived liberal enemies, and a group so disillusioned and alienated by that fight that they feel they have no other choice but to leave evangelicalism. Yet, there are traces of evangelicals who stay in the faith and fight against the conversative, apocalyptic political positions. As Douglas suggests, the fact that <i>The Shack</i> remains popular while presenting an alternative set of moral priorities indicates that there are different paths that evangelicals can take. Both Pogue and Cook point to a small number of evangelicals who find ways of reconciling “liberal” political projects with evangelical beliefs and practices. Karen Prior is another one of those evangelicals. In her paper, Prior tells the story of the #ChurchToo movement, in which women came forward to call out evangelical leaders for perpetrating sexual abuse and covering it up. In the face of the evangelical reaction to the #ChurchToo movement, Prior says she experienced disillusionment, just as many exvangelicals have experienced. While she is sympathetic toward those who have been prompted to leave the faith, she has remained and calls for reform. She provides an important reminder that not everyone who remains an evangelical embraces the political projects of the Religious Right in the culture wars, but that some continue to do the hard work of trying to change evangelicalism from the inside.</p>","PeriodicalId":44809,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jacc.13532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apocalypse deferred: Evangelical imagination and the decline of White Christian America\",\"authors\":\"Ken Paradis,&nbsp;Andrew Connolly\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jacc.13532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Two decades ago, in the years on either side of the turn of the millennium, American evangelical culture (i.e., White evangelical culture) was at the apex of its cultural influence and demographic reach, and a certain sense of immanent Apocalypse or victorious revelation of a righteous new order was in the air. There was a sense that America had badly lost its way and that people of faith were being persecuted in this society now under the spell of secular humanism, but that revival was happening and the tide was turning. Since the 1970s, the evangelical subculture had coalesced within a coherent mediasphere that reflected the world back to them in the image of their faith, huge church complexes had sprouted up across suburbia, the Christian Right had given the silent majority a powerful political voice, and sophisticated parachurch organizations such as Focus on the Family were shaping public discourse around key moral ideas. Evangelical girls were embracing their God-given purity, evangelical men were discovering the divine truth of their wild-at-heart masculinity and evangelicals young and old were reveling in thrillers that dramatized the sense that the end of days was at hand and ultimate victory was imminent. A contract with America had been forged to return the nation to its truth, an evangelical president was in the White House leading a crusade against savage infidels who hated America for its freedom, and a Joshua Generation of homeschooled evangelical children had begun to emerge, to finish the blessed reconquest of their nation.</p><p>But over the past two decades, that sweet sense of immanent political, cultural, and eschatological triumph has soured. Geopolitical crusades bogged down, purity culture femininity and heroic Christian masculinity collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions in a changing culture, and instead of carrying the banner of cultural conquest the younger generation of White evangelicals have increasingly questioned their elders' priorities and the church itself. The narrative of national decline and evangelical resistance in the face of persecution and oppression had been powerfully mobilizing during the period when it was easy to believe that the decline would soon be reversed, but it acquired a different valence in the period when the dream of the restoration of a White Christian America started to seem less and less possible, at least within the framework of democratic politics and existing institutions. In the wake of America's first Black President, homosexual marriage becoming law of the land, the #MeToo, #ChurchToo, and Black Lives Matter movements, as well as the ascension of Donald Trump, members of the social and political formation Robert Jones calls “White Christian America” increasingly articulated their anxieties around declining influence in new formations of politicized faith structured not around church basement prayer groups, but around Fox News and Facebook, YouTube, Gab, Parler, and Telegram, as well as a dense ecosystem of pundits, influencers and podcasting prophets.</p><p>This special issue explores what happened to the cultural seeds that were planted in the triumphal moment of White evangelical America, but that ripened in the grim climate of the Obama/Trump periods and fruited, arguably, in the reactionary Christian authoritarianism on display at the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. It looks at what happens when social and “alternative” media offering visions of reality that better conform to the culture's desires and anxieties supplant the local church as a primary filter for faith and fellowship. It looks at what happens when various conspiritualisms (conspiracy + spirituality) appropriate the imaginative resources of evangelical Apocalypticism, making evangelical culture the primary vector for the widespread adoption of conspiratorial ideation within a conservative movement that now centrally understands itself via the trope of embattlement. It looks at what happens when the political agenda favored by a majority of White evangelicals triumphs even while this agenda is increasingly recognized as something that can only be achieved via minoritarian distortions of the electoral system or by overt resistance to traditional political institutions and mechanisms.</p><p>Using Moral Foundations Theory, Christopher Douglas looks at how two novels represent two different sets of moral priorities within contemporary evangelicalism. <i>The Shack</i> “stresses the values of care and fairness-as-equality,” while the <i>Left Behind</i> series, and particularly <i>Glorious Appearing</i> “depends on values of loyalty, authority, sanctity, and fairness-as-reciprocity.” The contrast points to the diversity within evangelicalism. Diversity within Evangelicalism does not always mean that there is room for liberal voices. As Jenny Van Houdt suggests, an apocalyptic narrative functions as an effective mobilizing concept that draws together not just different kinds of evangelicals, but different kinds of White conservatives. Fear is packaged in a way that members of diverse ideological commitments become allies with a common, liberal enemy, leading to actions like the January 6 insurrection. Vilifying liberal ideals is a common theme in two other papers as well. Neall Pogue looks at how evangelicals' view of nature shifted away from the predominant acceptance of a stewardship model in the 1970s and 1980s toward what had previously been a minority position, depicting nature, almost uniformly since the early 1990s as something that had to be struggled with, overcome, and brought into the service of human goals, aspirations, and commercial interests. As environmentalists began to challenge these ideas, conservative evangelicals responded by framing those environmentalists and their policies as threats, making environmental concerns a battleground in the ongoing Culture Wars. Jacob Cook examines another significant target in the Culture Wars: Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Intersectionality. Cook points out that evangelicals draw on the rhetoric of “worldviews” to help group proponents of CRT with other liberal projects. Worldview language, argues Cook, motivates conservative evangelicals to oppose critical theory, rather than reflect on potentially damaging policies and practices within their own ranks. The result, as Cook concludes, is that some evangelicals are alienated from a larger, predominantly White evangelical culture.</p><p>This issue also explores evidence that the crises of the past decades—including the difficult confrontations with histories of racism, sexual abuse, and homophobia—have spawned new forms of culture among people with roots in evangelical traditions, both among people who now identify as “ex-vangelical” and among those who want to continue in some version of their faith tradition even if unwilling—or feeling unwelcome—to identify as “evangelical.” It explores the cultural anxieties and faith-informed aspirations attendant on the demographic decline of “White Christian America” in the past two decades that are manifest in the products and discourses that contemporary North American Evangelical culture and its offshoots produce and consume.</p><p>Matthew Mullins examines someone who became a voice for exvangelicals. Singer songwriter David Bazan was a successful evangelical rock star, but he began to question evangelical theology, and just as importantly, the deep connection between evangelicals and conservative politics in the United States. Mullins analyzes the way these doubts began to appear in Bazan's music and chronicles his eventual departure from evangelicalism, even though that faith tradition still informs much of Bazan's life and music. Isaac Sharp chronicles the exodus of another evangelical musician, Christian rap artist Lecrae. Lecrae enjoyed significant popularity within the largely white evangelical cultural community until he began to speak out against racial violence following the death of Trayvon Martin in 2012. The backlash he experienced led him to realize that he was not welcome in the evangelical cultural community, and ultimately ceased considering himself an evangelical. Sharp suggests that Lecrae's departure is representative of a larger alienation of Black evangelicals within the White evangelical cultural community. Melodie Roschman examines another group that has been alienated by the evangelical church: trans people. Roschman focuses on trans author Daniel M. Lavery's 2020 memoir <i>Something That May Shock and Discredit You</i>. While the memoir chronicles his difficult childhood in the church, Roschman argues that it subverts the conventions of both trans memoir and evangelical conversion stories. In particular, Rochman looks at the way Lavery reimagines and remixes Biblical stories as a way of coming to terms with his evangelical upbringing and recuperating part of his past. Like Bazan, Lavery acknowledges the continuing influence of evangelicalism in his life but strives to reframe it in a way that compliments his trans identity.</p><p>These two groups of papers may appear to set up a dichotomy: a conservative, white evangelical community that actively combats perceived liberal enemies, and a group so disillusioned and alienated by that fight that they feel they have no other choice but to leave evangelicalism. Yet, there are traces of evangelicals who stay in the faith and fight against the conversative, apocalyptic political positions. As Douglas suggests, the fact that <i>The Shack</i> remains popular while presenting an alternative set of moral priorities indicates that there are different paths that evangelicals can take. Both Pogue and Cook point to a small number of evangelicals who find ways of reconciling “liberal” political projects with evangelical beliefs and practices. Karen Prior is another one of those evangelicals. In her paper, Prior tells the story of the #ChurchToo movement, in which women came forward to call out evangelical leaders for perpetrating sexual abuse and covering it up. In the face of the evangelical reaction to the #ChurchToo movement, Prior says she experienced disillusionment, just as many exvangelicals have experienced. While she is sympathetic toward those who have been prompted to leave the faith, she has remained and calls for reform. She provides an important reminder that not everyone who remains an evangelical embraces the political projects of the Religious Right in the culture wars, but that some continue to do the hard work of trying to change evangelicalism from the inside.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jacc.13532\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacc.13532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jacc.13532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如珍妮-范-霍特(Jenny Van Houdt)所言,世界末日叙事是一种有效的动员概念,它不仅能将不同类型的福音派人士聚集在一起,还能将不同类型的白人保守派人士聚集在一起。恐惧被包装成一种方式,使不同意识形态的成员与一个共同的自由主义敌人成为盟友,从而导致类似 "1 月 6 日叛乱 "这样的行动。诋毁自由主义理想也是另外两篇论文的共同主题。尼尔-波格(Neall Pogue)研究了福音派对大自然的看法是如何从 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代占主导地位的管理模式转变为之前的少数派立场的,自 20 世纪 90 年代初以来,福音派几乎一致地将大自然描绘成必须与之斗争、战胜它并为人类目标、愿望和商业利益服务的东西。当环保主义者开始挑战这些观点时,保守的福音派人士做出了回应,将这些环保主义者及其政策诬蔑为威胁,使环境问题成为正在进行的文化战争中的一个战场。雅各布-库克(Jacob Cook)研究了文化战争中的另一个重要目标:批判种族理论(CRT)和交叉性。库克指出,福音派利用 "世界观 "的修辞来帮助将批判种族理论的支持者与其他自由派项目归为一类。库克认为,"世界观 "语言促使保守的福音派反对批判理论,而不是反思其内部潜在的破坏性政策和实践。本期还探讨了过去几十年的危机--包括与种族主义、性虐待和仇视同性恋等历史的艰难对抗--在扎根于福音派传统的人群中催生了新的文化形式的证据,其中既有现在认同为 "前福音派 "的人,也有那些即使不愿意--或者感觉不受欢迎--认同为 "福音派",但仍希望继续某种版本的信仰传统的人。马修-穆林斯(Matthew Mullins)探讨了过去二十年来 "美国白人基督徒 "人口减少所带来的文化焦虑和信仰愿望,这些焦虑和愿望体现在当代北美福音派文化及其分支所生产和消费的产品和话语中。作曲家大卫-巴赞(David Bazan)是一位成功的福音派摇滚明星,但他开始质疑福音派神学,同样重要的是质疑福音派与美国保守派政治之间的深层联系。穆林斯分析了这些质疑开始出现在巴赞音乐中的方式,并记录了他最终离开福音派的过程,尽管这一信仰传统仍在很大程度上影响着巴赞的生活和音乐。艾萨克-夏普记录了另一位福音派音乐家、基督教说唱艺术家莱克雷的出走。莱克雷在以白人为主的福音派文化社区中享有很高的知名度,直到 2012 年特雷文-马丁(Trayvon Martin)死亡事件发生后,他开始公开反对种族暴力。他所经历的反弹使他意识到自己在福音派文化社区中并不受欢迎,并最终不再认为自己是福音派教徒。夏普认为,莱克雷的离开代表了白人福音派文化社区对黑人福音派的更大疏远。Melodie Roschman 研究了另一个被福音派教会疏远的群体:变性人。Roschman 重点关注了变性作家丹尼尔-M-拉弗里(Daniel M. Lavery)在 2020 年出版的回忆录《Something That May Shock and Discredit You》。这本回忆录记录了他在教会中艰难的童年生活,但罗奇曼认为,它颠覆了变性回忆录和福音派改变信仰故事的传统。特别是,罗奇曼研究了拉弗里重新想象和重新混合圣经故事的方式,以此来接受他的福音派成长经历,并恢复他的部分过去。与巴赞一样,拉弗里承认福音派对他的生活持续产生影响,但他努力重塑福音派,使之与他的变性身份相得益彰。这两组论文似乎形成了二元对立:一个是保守的白人福音派群体,他们积极与自由派的敌人作斗争;另一个群体则对这种斗争感到失望和疏远,他们认为自己别无选择,只能离开福音派。然而,也有一些福音派信徒坚守信仰,与对话式、世界末日式的政治立场作斗争。正如道格拉斯(Douglas)所言,《小屋》在提出另一套道德优先事项的同时仍然广受欢迎,这一事实表明福音派可以走不同的道路。波格和库克都指出,少数福音派人士找到了调和 "自由派 "政治项目与福音派信仰和实践的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Apocalypse deferred: Evangelical imagination and the decline of White Christian America

Two decades ago, in the years on either side of the turn of the millennium, American evangelical culture (i.e., White evangelical culture) was at the apex of its cultural influence and demographic reach, and a certain sense of immanent Apocalypse or victorious revelation of a righteous new order was in the air. There was a sense that America had badly lost its way and that people of faith were being persecuted in this society now under the spell of secular humanism, but that revival was happening and the tide was turning. Since the 1970s, the evangelical subculture had coalesced within a coherent mediasphere that reflected the world back to them in the image of their faith, huge church complexes had sprouted up across suburbia, the Christian Right had given the silent majority a powerful political voice, and sophisticated parachurch organizations such as Focus on the Family were shaping public discourse around key moral ideas. Evangelical girls were embracing their God-given purity, evangelical men were discovering the divine truth of their wild-at-heart masculinity and evangelicals young and old were reveling in thrillers that dramatized the sense that the end of days was at hand and ultimate victory was imminent. A contract with America had been forged to return the nation to its truth, an evangelical president was in the White House leading a crusade against savage infidels who hated America for its freedom, and a Joshua Generation of homeschooled evangelical children had begun to emerge, to finish the blessed reconquest of their nation.

But over the past two decades, that sweet sense of immanent political, cultural, and eschatological triumph has soured. Geopolitical crusades bogged down, purity culture femininity and heroic Christian masculinity collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions in a changing culture, and instead of carrying the banner of cultural conquest the younger generation of White evangelicals have increasingly questioned their elders' priorities and the church itself. The narrative of national decline and evangelical resistance in the face of persecution and oppression had been powerfully mobilizing during the period when it was easy to believe that the decline would soon be reversed, but it acquired a different valence in the period when the dream of the restoration of a White Christian America started to seem less and less possible, at least within the framework of democratic politics and existing institutions. In the wake of America's first Black President, homosexual marriage becoming law of the land, the #MeToo, #ChurchToo, and Black Lives Matter movements, as well as the ascension of Donald Trump, members of the social and political formation Robert Jones calls “White Christian America” increasingly articulated their anxieties around declining influence in new formations of politicized faith structured not around church basement prayer groups, but around Fox News and Facebook, YouTube, Gab, Parler, and Telegram, as well as a dense ecosystem of pundits, influencers and podcasting prophets.

This special issue explores what happened to the cultural seeds that were planted in the triumphal moment of White evangelical America, but that ripened in the grim climate of the Obama/Trump periods and fruited, arguably, in the reactionary Christian authoritarianism on display at the Capitol insurrection of January 6, 2021. It looks at what happens when social and “alternative” media offering visions of reality that better conform to the culture's desires and anxieties supplant the local church as a primary filter for faith and fellowship. It looks at what happens when various conspiritualisms (conspiracy + spirituality) appropriate the imaginative resources of evangelical Apocalypticism, making evangelical culture the primary vector for the widespread adoption of conspiratorial ideation within a conservative movement that now centrally understands itself via the trope of embattlement. It looks at what happens when the political agenda favored by a majority of White evangelicals triumphs even while this agenda is increasingly recognized as something that can only be achieved via minoritarian distortions of the electoral system or by overt resistance to traditional political institutions and mechanisms.

Using Moral Foundations Theory, Christopher Douglas looks at how two novels represent two different sets of moral priorities within contemporary evangelicalism. The Shack “stresses the values of care and fairness-as-equality,” while the Left Behind series, and particularly Glorious Appearing “depends on values of loyalty, authority, sanctity, and fairness-as-reciprocity.” The contrast points to the diversity within evangelicalism. Diversity within Evangelicalism does not always mean that there is room for liberal voices. As Jenny Van Houdt suggests, an apocalyptic narrative functions as an effective mobilizing concept that draws together not just different kinds of evangelicals, but different kinds of White conservatives. Fear is packaged in a way that members of diverse ideological commitments become allies with a common, liberal enemy, leading to actions like the January 6 insurrection. Vilifying liberal ideals is a common theme in two other papers as well. Neall Pogue looks at how evangelicals' view of nature shifted away from the predominant acceptance of a stewardship model in the 1970s and 1980s toward what had previously been a minority position, depicting nature, almost uniformly since the early 1990s as something that had to be struggled with, overcome, and brought into the service of human goals, aspirations, and commercial interests. As environmentalists began to challenge these ideas, conservative evangelicals responded by framing those environmentalists and their policies as threats, making environmental concerns a battleground in the ongoing Culture Wars. Jacob Cook examines another significant target in the Culture Wars: Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Intersectionality. Cook points out that evangelicals draw on the rhetoric of “worldviews” to help group proponents of CRT with other liberal projects. Worldview language, argues Cook, motivates conservative evangelicals to oppose critical theory, rather than reflect on potentially damaging policies and practices within their own ranks. The result, as Cook concludes, is that some evangelicals are alienated from a larger, predominantly White evangelical culture.

This issue also explores evidence that the crises of the past decades—including the difficult confrontations with histories of racism, sexual abuse, and homophobia—have spawned new forms of culture among people with roots in evangelical traditions, both among people who now identify as “ex-vangelical” and among those who want to continue in some version of their faith tradition even if unwilling—or feeling unwelcome—to identify as “evangelical.” It explores the cultural anxieties and faith-informed aspirations attendant on the demographic decline of “White Christian America” in the past two decades that are manifest in the products and discourses that contemporary North American Evangelical culture and its offshoots produce and consume.

Matthew Mullins examines someone who became a voice for exvangelicals. Singer songwriter David Bazan was a successful evangelical rock star, but he began to question evangelical theology, and just as importantly, the deep connection between evangelicals and conservative politics in the United States. Mullins analyzes the way these doubts began to appear in Bazan's music and chronicles his eventual departure from evangelicalism, even though that faith tradition still informs much of Bazan's life and music. Isaac Sharp chronicles the exodus of another evangelical musician, Christian rap artist Lecrae. Lecrae enjoyed significant popularity within the largely white evangelical cultural community until he began to speak out against racial violence following the death of Trayvon Martin in 2012. The backlash he experienced led him to realize that he was not welcome in the evangelical cultural community, and ultimately ceased considering himself an evangelical. Sharp suggests that Lecrae's departure is representative of a larger alienation of Black evangelicals within the White evangelical cultural community. Melodie Roschman examines another group that has been alienated by the evangelical church: trans people. Roschman focuses on trans author Daniel M. Lavery's 2020 memoir Something That May Shock and Discredit You. While the memoir chronicles his difficult childhood in the church, Roschman argues that it subverts the conventions of both trans memoir and evangelical conversion stories. In particular, Rochman looks at the way Lavery reimagines and remixes Biblical stories as a way of coming to terms with his evangelical upbringing and recuperating part of his past. Like Bazan, Lavery acknowledges the continuing influence of evangelicalism in his life but strives to reframe it in a way that compliments his trans identity.

These two groups of papers may appear to set up a dichotomy: a conservative, white evangelical community that actively combats perceived liberal enemies, and a group so disillusioned and alienated by that fight that they feel they have no other choice but to leave evangelicalism. Yet, there are traces of evangelicals who stay in the faith and fight against the conversative, apocalyptic political positions. As Douglas suggests, the fact that The Shack remains popular while presenting an alternative set of moral priorities indicates that there are different paths that evangelicals can take. Both Pogue and Cook point to a small number of evangelicals who find ways of reconciling “liberal” political projects with evangelical beliefs and practices. Karen Prior is another one of those evangelicals. In her paper, Prior tells the story of the #ChurchToo movement, in which women came forward to call out evangelical leaders for perpetrating sexual abuse and covering it up. In the face of the evangelical reaction to the #ChurchToo movement, Prior says she experienced disillusionment, just as many exvangelicals have experienced. While she is sympathetic toward those who have been prompted to leave the faith, she has remained and calls for reform. She provides an important reminder that not everyone who remains an evangelical embraces the political projects of the Religious Right in the culture wars, but that some continue to do the hard work of trying to change evangelicalism from the inside.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN CULTURE HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Anti-Organization man: Donald E. Westlake's Parker novels May fortune's lantern burn serene: An analysis of golden age Halloween postcards as middle-class promotional culture Returning to the river: The Rephotographic Survey Project and the (im)possibility of capturing the same sites “Friend in Need”: Cultivating homosocial communities in Love Story Magazine's fiction and editorial departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1