Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, Claudio Sosa, Thais Foster, Jose Luis Rossello, S. Serruya, B. D. Múcio
{"title":"产前教育作为促进产妇健康的工具有哪些益处?系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, Claudio Sosa, Thais Foster, Jose Luis Rossello, S. Serruya, B. D. Múcio","doi":"10.7322/abcshs.2022150.2213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Antenatal education is a low-cost intervention designed to increase the knowledge of pregnant women on pregnancy and childbirth and reduce fear related to labor pain. However, the impact of antenatal education programs on maternal outcomes is unclear. Objective: To investigate whether structured antenatal education programs affect maternal health outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2019, and randomized controlled trials investigating antenatal educational programs for low-risk pregnant women were included. Results: A total of 348 studies were identified; nine were included in this review. One study assessed the number of antenatal visits, while three showed that antenatal education programs significantly improved childbirth self-efficacy (outcome expectancy16.00 [95% CI 9.86-22.15] and efficacy expectancy 20.44 [95% CI=13.62-27.25]). Self-diagnosis on labor was investigated in two studies, and five demonstrated that antenatal education increased the frequency of vaginal delivery (odds ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63]) but not episiotomy (as observed in three studies). Conclusion: Structured antenatal education programs may increase childbirth self-efficacy and the frequency of vaginal delivery.","PeriodicalId":30632,"journal":{"name":"ABCS Health Sciences","volume":"2 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the benefits of antenatal education as a maternal health promotion tool? A systematic review with meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti, Claudio Sosa, Thais Foster, Jose Luis Rossello, S. Serruya, B. D. Múcio\",\"doi\":\"10.7322/abcshs.2022150.2213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Antenatal education is a low-cost intervention designed to increase the knowledge of pregnant women on pregnancy and childbirth and reduce fear related to labor pain. However, the impact of antenatal education programs on maternal outcomes is unclear. Objective: To investigate whether structured antenatal education programs affect maternal health outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2019, and randomized controlled trials investigating antenatal educational programs for low-risk pregnant women were included. Results: A total of 348 studies were identified; nine were included in this review. One study assessed the number of antenatal visits, while three showed that antenatal education programs significantly improved childbirth self-efficacy (outcome expectancy16.00 [95% CI 9.86-22.15] and efficacy expectancy 20.44 [95% CI=13.62-27.25]). Self-diagnosis on labor was investigated in two studies, and five demonstrated that antenatal education increased the frequency of vaginal delivery (odds ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63]) but not episiotomy (as observed in three studies). Conclusion: Structured antenatal education programs may increase childbirth self-efficacy and the frequency of vaginal delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABCS Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 s1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABCS Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2022150.2213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABCS Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2022150.2213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介产前教育是一种低成本的干预措施,旨在增加孕妇对怀孕和分娩的了解,减少对分娩疼痛的恐惧。然而,产前教育项目对产妇预后的影响尚不明确。研究目的调查有组织的产前教育项目是否会影响产妇的健康结果。方法:检索电子数据库:检索从开始到2019年11月的电子数据库,纳入调查低风险孕妇产前教育项目的随机对照试验。结果共确定了 348 项研究,其中 9 项被纳入本综述。一项研究评估了产前检查的次数,三项研究显示产前教育项目显著提高了分娩自我效能(结果预期值16.00 [95% CI 9.86-22.15],效能预期值20.44 [95% CI=13.62-27.25])。两项研究对分娩时的自我诊断进行了调查,五项研究表明,产前教育增加了阴道分娩的频率(几率比 1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63]),但没有增加外阴切开术的频率(三项研究观察到)。结论有组织的产前教育项目可提高分娩自我效能和阴道分娩的频率。
What are the benefits of antenatal education as a maternal health promotion tool? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Introduction: Antenatal education is a low-cost intervention designed to increase the knowledge of pregnant women on pregnancy and childbirth and reduce fear related to labor pain. However, the impact of antenatal education programs on maternal outcomes is unclear. Objective: To investigate whether structured antenatal education programs affect maternal health outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2019, and randomized controlled trials investigating antenatal educational programs for low-risk pregnant women were included. Results: A total of 348 studies were identified; nine were included in this review. One study assessed the number of antenatal visits, while three showed that antenatal education programs significantly improved childbirth self-efficacy (outcome expectancy16.00 [95% CI 9.86-22.15] and efficacy expectancy 20.44 [95% CI=13.62-27.25]). Self-diagnosis on labor was investigated in two studies, and five demonstrated that antenatal education increased the frequency of vaginal delivery (odds ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.01-1.63]) but not episiotomy (as observed in three studies). Conclusion: Structured antenatal education programs may increase childbirth self-efficacy and the frequency of vaginal delivery.