尼采是形而上学家，但又是哪种形而上学？回应贾斯汀-雷姆霍夫

Asian journal of philosophy Pub Date : 2024-03-10 DOI:10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y

Tsarina Doyle

{"title":"尼采是形而上学家，但又是哪种形而上学？回应贾斯汀-雷姆霍夫","authors":"Tsarina Doyle","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article is a critical response to Justin Remhof’s <i>Nietzsche as Metaphysician.</i> It contends that Remhof runs the question of whether Nietzsche is a metaphysician too closely with the related but separate question of what type of metaphysician he is. It is argued that Remhof is correct in claiming that Nietzsche is a metaphysician and that his metaphysics informs his wider philosophy. However, Remhof’s view that Nietzsche is a metaphysical constructivist is subject to criticism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nietzsche as metaphysician but which metaphysics? A response to Justin Remhof\",\"authors\":\"Tsarina Doyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article is a critical response to Justin Remhof’s <i>Nietzsche as Metaphysician.</i> It contends that Remhof runs the question of whether Nietzsche is a metaphysician too closely with the related but separate question of what type of metaphysician he is. It is argued that Remhof is correct in claiming that Nietzsche is a metaphysician and that his metaphysics informs his wider philosophy. However, Remhof’s view that Nietzsche is a metaphysical constructivist is subject to criticism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-024-00153-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对 Justin Remhof 的《作为形而上学家的尼采》的批判性回应。文章认为，雷姆霍夫将尼采是否是形而上学家的问题与尼采是哪种类型的形而上学家这一相关但独立的问题联系得过于紧密。文章认为，雷姆霍夫关于尼采是形而上学家的说法是正确的，他的形而上学为他更广泛的哲学提供了信息。然而，雷姆霍夫关于尼采是形而上学建构主义者的观点受到了批评。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Nietzsche as metaphysician but which metaphysics? A response to Justin Remhof

This article is a critical response to Justin Remhof’s Nietzsche as Metaphysician. It contends that Remhof runs the question of whether Nietzsche is a metaphysician too closely with the related but separate question of what type of metaphysician he is. It is argued that Remhof is correct in claiming that Nietzsche is a metaphysician and that his metaphysics informs his wider philosophy. However, Remhof’s view that Nietzsche is a metaphysical constructivist is subject to criticism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian journal of philosophy

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量