血栓清除 2020+ 计划加勒比地区的中风溶栓现状

Gillian Gordon Perue, Esmeralda Segura, Domini Crandon, Francene Gayle, Jude Charles, Nycole Joseph, G. S. Saint Croix, Ryna Then, V. Inoa
{"title":"血栓清除 2020+ 计划加勒比地区的中风溶栓现状","authors":"Gillian Gordon Perue, Esmeralda Segura, Domini Crandon, Francene Gayle, Jude Charles, Nycole Joseph, G. S. Saint Croix, Ryna Then, V. Inoa","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Low‐ to middle‐income countries have limited access to thrombolytic therapy. To our knowledge, there is no validated tool available to objectively measure access to thrombolytic agents or barriers to routine clinical use.\n \n \n \n We developed the 17‐item tissue plasminogen activator Spot Check tool to assess usage of acute stroke thrombolysis regarding local experience, financial constraints, and perceived barriers to care; evaluating the current state of clinical practices in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean region. The survey was disseminated via an online link, and the information was collected and analyzed via SPSS.\n \n \n \n \n The tool was validated by 3 international experts with an Average Content Validity Index of 1 and a Universal Agreement Index of 1 across 3 domains: local experience, financial constraints, and barriers to usage. The participant survey response rate was 64%, representing 15 of 44 Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean countries. There was limited or no access to thrombolytic agents in 40% of countries surveyed. Among cases treated with thrombolytics, 43% of patients had to pay out of pocket before treatment was provided, and l<10% were covered by insurance/government. Among 51% of countries surveyed, no acute thrombolytic treatment was provided for acute stroke in the 2021 calendar year. Only 1 center treated >100 cases per year. Most respondents (88%) agreed there were barriers to acute stroke thrombolysis in the region. The tissue plasminogen activator Spot Check tool was able to identify barriers impacting the number of cases per year, including absence of stroke protocol (\n P\n <0.001), upfront cost of alteplase (\n P\n = 0.003), restricted the amount of thrombolytics (\n P\n = 0.002), neurology intensive care unit or stroke unit monitoring of patients following thrombolytics (\n P\n = 0.017), cost of thrombolytic agents to the hospital (\n P\n = 0.042), and access to computed tomography scan (\n P\n = 0.03).\n \n \n \n \n This survey brings light to an enormous disparity in the care of stroke patients around the world, specifically in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean region.\n","PeriodicalId":21977,"journal":{"name":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","volume":"182 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Status of Stroke Thrombolysis in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean Region\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Gordon Perue, Esmeralda Segura, Domini Crandon, Francene Gayle, Jude Charles, Nycole Joseph, G. S. Saint Croix, Ryna Then, V. Inoa\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.123.001161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Low‐ to middle‐income countries have limited access to thrombolytic therapy. To our knowledge, there is no validated tool available to objectively measure access to thrombolytic agents or barriers to routine clinical use.\\n \\n \\n \\n We developed the 17‐item tissue plasminogen activator Spot Check tool to assess usage of acute stroke thrombolysis regarding local experience, financial constraints, and perceived barriers to care; evaluating the current state of clinical practices in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean region. The survey was disseminated via an online link, and the information was collected and analyzed via SPSS.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n The tool was validated by 3 international experts with an Average Content Validity Index of 1 and a Universal Agreement Index of 1 across 3 domains: local experience, financial constraints, and barriers to usage. The participant survey response rate was 64%, representing 15 of 44 Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean countries. There was limited or no access to thrombolytic agents in 40% of countries surveyed. Among cases treated with thrombolytics, 43% of patients had to pay out of pocket before treatment was provided, and l<10% were covered by insurance/government. Among 51% of countries surveyed, no acute thrombolytic treatment was provided for acute stroke in the 2021 calendar year. Only 1 center treated >100 cases per year. Most respondents (88%) agreed there were barriers to acute stroke thrombolysis in the region. The tissue plasminogen activator Spot Check tool was able to identify barriers impacting the number of cases per year, including absence of stroke protocol (\\n P\\n <0.001), upfront cost of alteplase (\\n P\\n = 0.003), restricted the amount of thrombolytics (\\n P\\n = 0.002), neurology intensive care unit or stroke unit monitoring of patients following thrombolytics (\\n P\\n = 0.017), cost of thrombolytic agents to the hospital (\\n P\\n = 0.042), and access to computed tomography scan (\\n P\\n = 0.03).\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n This survey brings light to an enormous disparity in the care of stroke patients around the world, specifically in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean region.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":\"182 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.001161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中低收入国家获得溶栓疗法的机会有限。据我们所知,目前还没有经过验证的工具来客观衡量溶栓药物的可及性或常规临床使用的障碍。 我们开发了由 17 个项目组成的组织凝血活酶原激活剂抽查工具,以评估急性中风溶栓治疗的使用情况,包括当地经验、经济限制和感知到的治疗障碍;评估 "血栓切除任务 2020+ 加勒比地区 "的临床实践现状。该调查通过在线链接进行传播,并通过 SPSS 收集和分析信息。 该工具由 3 位国际专家验证,在当地经验、财务限制和使用障碍 3 个方面的平均内容有效性指数为 1,普遍一致性指数为 1。参与调查者的回复率为 64%,代表了 44 个 "血栓切除 2020+ 计划 "加勒比海国家中的 15 个国家。在接受调查的国家中,有 40% 的国家只能有限地获得或根本无法获得溶栓药物。在接受溶栓治疗的病例中,43%的患者在接受治疗前必须自费,每年有l100例。大多数受访者(88%)认为该地区急性中风溶栓治疗存在障碍。组织浆细胞酶原激活剂定点检查工具能够找出影响每年病例数的障碍,包括缺乏中风治疗方案(P <0.001)、阿替普酶的前期费用(P = 0.003)、溶栓药物的用量限制(P = 0.002)、神经科重症监护室或卒中单元对溶栓后患者的监测(P = 0.017)、医院的溶栓药物成本(P = 0.042)和计算机断层扫描(P = 0.03)。 这项调查揭示了世界各地,特别是 "2020 年血栓切除任务+"加勒比地区在中风病人护理方面存在的巨大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Status of Stroke Thrombolysis in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean Region
Low‐ to middle‐income countries have limited access to thrombolytic therapy. To our knowledge, there is no validated tool available to objectively measure access to thrombolytic agents or barriers to routine clinical use. We developed the 17‐item tissue plasminogen activator Spot Check tool to assess usage of acute stroke thrombolysis regarding local experience, financial constraints, and perceived barriers to care; evaluating the current state of clinical practices in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean region. The survey was disseminated via an online link, and the information was collected and analyzed via SPSS. The tool was validated by 3 international experts with an Average Content Validity Index of 1 and a Universal Agreement Index of 1 across 3 domains: local experience, financial constraints, and barriers to usage. The participant survey response rate was 64%, representing 15 of 44 Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean countries. There was limited or no access to thrombolytic agents in 40% of countries surveyed. Among cases treated with thrombolytics, 43% of patients had to pay out of pocket before treatment was provided, and l<10% were covered by insurance/government. Among 51% of countries surveyed, no acute thrombolytic treatment was provided for acute stroke in the 2021 calendar year. Only 1 center treated >100 cases per year. Most respondents (88%) agreed there were barriers to acute stroke thrombolysis in the region. The tissue plasminogen activator Spot Check tool was able to identify barriers impacting the number of cases per year, including absence of stroke protocol ( P <0.001), upfront cost of alteplase ( P = 0.003), restricted the amount of thrombolytics ( P = 0.002), neurology intensive care unit or stroke unit monitoring of patients following thrombolytics ( P = 0.017), cost of thrombolytic agents to the hospital ( P = 0.042), and access to computed tomography scan ( P = 0.03). This survey brings light to an enormous disparity in the care of stroke patients around the world, specifically in the Mission Thrombectomy 2020+ Caribbean region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prognostication Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Modified Hunt and Hess Grading Scale Intra‐arterial Selective Bevacizumab Administration in the Middle Meningeal Artery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: An Early Experience in 12 Hemispheres Sex Disparities in Mortality After Endovascular Therapy in Large Core Infarcts Predicting Recanalization Failure With Conventional Devices During Endovascular Treatment Related to Vessel Occlusion Antiplatelet Therapy and Platelet Activity Testing for Neurointerventional Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1