南非公立大学部分学科博士学位授予时间研究

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.20853/38-1-6268
M.H. van Lill
{"title":"南非公立大学部分学科博士学位授予时间研究","authors":"M.H. van Lill","doi":"10.20853/38-1-6268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarship on doctoral success highlights differences in timely degree attainment between disciplines. However, research on doctoral education in South Africa is limited to identifying general factors that affect the successful completion of a doctoral degree with very little reference to differences across disciplines. This study’s objective is to compare time-to-degree, as the number of years between a doctoral student’s commencement year and graduation year, across selected disciplines as well as to identify factors, above and beyond that of disciplinary field, which are explanatory of shorter time-to-degree. The study investigates the role of selected student demographics (such as commencement age, gender, race, and nationality), institutional (type of higher education institution), and situational factors (such as part-time or full-time enrolment) in predicting doctoral time-to-degree. Results of multiple linear regression models indicate that mode of enrolment is the strongest predictor of completion time with part-time students recording a statistically significantly longer time-to-degree when compared to full-time students. A student’s discipline, nationality, and institution are also identified as statistically significant predictors of time-to-degree while gender, race, and age are not. However, the interaction between commencement age and enrolment mode is indicated to be a strong predictor of doctoral completion time. Although shorter completion times can be considered an indicator of efficiency at doctoral level, it is imperative to consider wider contextual factors in thinking about this issue.","PeriodicalId":44786,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of doctoral time-to-degree in selected disciplines at South African public universities\",\"authors\":\"M.H. van Lill\",\"doi\":\"10.20853/38-1-6268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholarship on doctoral success highlights differences in timely degree attainment between disciplines. However, research on doctoral education in South Africa is limited to identifying general factors that affect the successful completion of a doctoral degree with very little reference to differences across disciplines. This study’s objective is to compare time-to-degree, as the number of years between a doctoral student’s commencement year and graduation year, across selected disciplines as well as to identify factors, above and beyond that of disciplinary field, which are explanatory of shorter time-to-degree. The study investigates the role of selected student demographics (such as commencement age, gender, race, and nationality), institutional (type of higher education institution), and situational factors (such as part-time or full-time enrolment) in predicting doctoral time-to-degree. Results of multiple linear regression models indicate that mode of enrolment is the strongest predictor of completion time with part-time students recording a statistically significantly longer time-to-degree when compared to full-time students. A student’s discipline, nationality, and institution are also identified as statistically significant predictors of time-to-degree while gender, race, and age are not. However, the interaction between commencement age and enrolment mode is indicated to be a strong predictor of doctoral completion time. Although shorter completion times can be considered an indicator of efficiency at doctoral level, it is imperative to consider wider contextual factors in thinking about this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20853/38-1-6268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20853/38-1-6268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关博士生成功的学术研究突出强调了不同学科在及时获得学位方面的差异。然而,对南非博士生教育的研究仅限于确定影响成功完成博士学位的一般因素,很少涉及不同学科之间的差异。本研究的目的是比较不同学科的博士生获得学位的时间,即博士生从入学年份到毕业 年份之间的间隔年数,并找出学科领域之外能够解释缩短博士生获得学位时间的因素。本研究调查了选定的学生人口统计学因素(如毕业年龄、性别、种族和国籍)、机构因素(高等教育机构类型)和情境因素(如非全日制或全日制入学)在预测博士学位授予时间方面的作用。多元线性回归模型的结果表明,入学方式是预测完成学业时间最有力的因素,与全日制学生相比,非全日制学生获得学位的时间在统计学上明显更长。学生的学科、国籍和院校在统计学上也被认为是学位完成时间的重要预测因素,而性别、种族和年龄则不是。不过,入学年龄与入学方式之间的交互作用对博士生完成学业的时间有很强的预测作用。尽管较短的完成时间可被视为博士生阶段的效率指标,但在思考这一问题时必须考虑到更广泛的背景因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A study of doctoral time-to-degree in selected disciplines at South African public universities
Scholarship on doctoral success highlights differences in timely degree attainment between disciplines. However, research on doctoral education in South Africa is limited to identifying general factors that affect the successful completion of a doctoral degree with very little reference to differences across disciplines. This study’s objective is to compare time-to-degree, as the number of years between a doctoral student’s commencement year and graduation year, across selected disciplines as well as to identify factors, above and beyond that of disciplinary field, which are explanatory of shorter time-to-degree. The study investigates the role of selected student demographics (such as commencement age, gender, race, and nationality), institutional (type of higher education institution), and situational factors (such as part-time or full-time enrolment) in predicting doctoral time-to-degree. Results of multiple linear regression models indicate that mode of enrolment is the strongest predictor of completion time with part-time students recording a statistically significantly longer time-to-degree when compared to full-time students. A student’s discipline, nationality, and institution are also identified as statistically significant predictors of time-to-degree while gender, race, and age are not. However, the interaction between commencement age and enrolment mode is indicated to be a strong predictor of doctoral completion time. Although shorter completion times can be considered an indicator of efficiency at doctoral level, it is imperative to consider wider contextual factors in thinking about this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Higher Education
South African Journal of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
28.60%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of key success factors in postgraduate studies Internationalisation and the lived experiences of Non-South African postgraduate students in accessing higher education in South Africa Barriers towards research activities among academics in the chartered accountancy stream at the North-West University, South Africa Key factors contributing to postgraduate students’ success: Making a case for Coronavirus-19 and beyond Mind the gap – industry perceptions about postgraduate studies in the discipline of design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1