{"title":"振荡积分的菲隆型规则比较研究","authors":"H. Majidian","doi":"10.33993/jnaat531-1380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our aim is to answer the following question: \"Among the Filon-type methods for computing oscillatory integrals, which one is the most efficient in practice?\". We first discuss why we should seek the answer among the family of Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules. A theoretical analysis accompanied by a set of numerical experiments reveals that the plain Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules reach a given accuracy faster than the (adaptive) extended Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules. The comparison is based on the CPU run-time for certain wave numbers (medium and large).","PeriodicalId":287022,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory","volume":"72 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of Filon-type rules for oscillatory integrals\",\"authors\":\"H. Majidian\",\"doi\":\"10.33993/jnaat531-1380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our aim is to answer the following question: \\\"Among the Filon-type methods for computing oscillatory integrals, which one is the most efficient in practice?\\\". We first discuss why we should seek the answer among the family of Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules. A theoretical analysis accompanied by a set of numerical experiments reveals that the plain Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules reach a given accuracy faster than the (adaptive) extended Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules. The comparison is based on the CPU run-time for certain wave numbers (medium and large).\",\"PeriodicalId\":287022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory\",\"volume\":\"72 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33993/jnaat531-1380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Numerical Analysis and Approximation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/jnaat531-1380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们的目的是回答以下问题："在计算振荡积分的菲隆类方法中，哪种方法在实践中最有效？我们首先讨论为什么要在菲隆-克伦肖-柯蒂斯规则家族中寻找答案。理论分析和一组数值实验表明，普通菲隆-克伦肖-柯蒂斯规则比（自适应）扩展菲隆-克伦肖-柯蒂斯规则更快达到给定精度。比较基于某些波数（中、大）的 CPU 运行时间。
A comparative study of Filon-type rules for oscillatory integrals
Our aim is to answer the following question: "Among the Filon-type methods for computing oscillatory integrals, which one is the most efficient in practice?". We first discuss why we should seek the answer among the family of Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules. A theoretical analysis accompanied by a set of numerical experiments reveals that the plain Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules reach a given accuracy faster than the (adaptive) extended Filon-Clenshaw-Curtis rules. The comparison is based on the CPU run-time for certain wave numbers (medium and large).
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
