探索狗对私人住宅中人猫关系的影响

Sara T. Clarkson, Lori R. Kogan, E. Grigg
{"title":"探索狗对私人住宅中人猫关系的影响","authors":"Sara T. Clarkson, Lori R. Kogan, E. Grigg","doi":"10.1079/hai.2024.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Despite the growing numbers of dogs and cats cohabiting in US households, little research has focused on the influence of dogs on the human-animal bond of their feline roommates. The present study investigated whether cohabiting with a dog has an impact on the human-cat bond and the ways in which cats interact with humans. Based on existing knowledge of the differences between human-dog and human-cat interactions, we predicted that cats who have lived with a dog for at least 1 year will exhibit differences in the bond and interaction frequency with their owners. A 46-item survey was administered to 682 US cat owners via social media (SM) and Mechanical Turk (MTurk), Amazon’s crowdsourcing service, to collect data on demographics, interaction frequency, behavioral issues, and pet-owner bond. Although owners in cat-only households tended to report slightly higher bond scores with their cats (\n \n \n μ\n \n \n SM\n = 30.34;\n \n \n μ\n \n \n Mturk\n = 28.32) than owners in mixed households (\n \n \n μ\n \n \n SM\n = 29.33;\n \n \n μ\n \n \n Mturk\n = 27.42), the differences were small, and the association between household type and bond score was not significant (\n p\n SM\n = 0.973,\n p\n MTurk\n = 0.124). Owners who engaged in more frequent active interactions with their cats had higher bond scores. These results indicate that spending more time engaging in active interactions with one’s cat is associated with a stronger bond, and the frequency of these interactions may be more important than the presence of a cohabiting dog.\n","PeriodicalId":507269,"journal":{"name":"Human-Animal Interactions","volume":"67 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of dogs on the human-cat relationship in private homes\",\"authors\":\"Sara T. Clarkson, Lori R. Kogan, E. Grigg\",\"doi\":\"10.1079/hai.2024.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Despite the growing numbers of dogs and cats cohabiting in US households, little research has focused on the influence of dogs on the human-animal bond of their feline roommates. The present study investigated whether cohabiting with a dog has an impact on the human-cat bond and the ways in which cats interact with humans. Based on existing knowledge of the differences between human-dog and human-cat interactions, we predicted that cats who have lived with a dog for at least 1 year will exhibit differences in the bond and interaction frequency with their owners. A 46-item survey was administered to 682 US cat owners via social media (SM) and Mechanical Turk (MTurk), Amazon’s crowdsourcing service, to collect data on demographics, interaction frequency, behavioral issues, and pet-owner bond. Although owners in cat-only households tended to report slightly higher bond scores with their cats (\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n SM\\n = 30.34;\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n Mturk\\n = 28.32) than owners in mixed households (\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n SM\\n = 29.33;\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n Mturk\\n = 27.42), the differences were small, and the association between household type and bond score was not significant (\\n p\\n SM\\n = 0.973,\\n p\\n MTurk\\n = 0.124). Owners who engaged in more frequent active interactions with their cats had higher bond scores. These results indicate that spending more time engaging in active interactions with one’s cat is associated with a stronger bond, and the frequency of these interactions may be more important than the presence of a cohabiting dog.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":507269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human-Animal Interactions\",\"volume\":\"67 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human-Animal Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2024.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-Animal Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2024.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管美国家庭中猫狗同居的数量越来越多,但很少有研究关注狗对猫室友的人猫关系的影响。本研究调查了与狗同居是否会影响人猫关系以及猫与人类互动的方式。根据现有的关于人狗互动和人猫互动之间差异的知识,我们预测与狗同居至少一年的猫在与主人的关系和互动频率上会表现出差异。我们通过社交媒体(SM)和亚马逊的众包服务 Mechanical Turk(MTurk)对 682 位美国猫咪主人进行了 46 个项目的调查,以收集有关人口统计学、互动频率、行为问题和宠物与主人关系的数据。虽然纯猫家庭的主人与猫咪的感情评分(μ SM = 30.34;μ Mturk = 28.32)往往略高于混合家庭的主人(μ SM = 29.33;μ Mturk = 27.42),但差异很小,而且家庭类型与感情评分之间的关系并不显著(p SM = 0.973,p MTurk = 0.124)。与猫咪进行更频繁的积极互动的主人的亲情得分更高。这些结果表明,花更多的时间与猫进行积极的互动与更强的亲情有关,而这些互动的频率可能比是否有同居的狗更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the impact of dogs on the human-cat relationship in private homes
Despite the growing numbers of dogs and cats cohabiting in US households, little research has focused on the influence of dogs on the human-animal bond of their feline roommates. The present study investigated whether cohabiting with a dog has an impact on the human-cat bond and the ways in which cats interact with humans. Based on existing knowledge of the differences between human-dog and human-cat interactions, we predicted that cats who have lived with a dog for at least 1 year will exhibit differences in the bond and interaction frequency with their owners. A 46-item survey was administered to 682 US cat owners via social media (SM) and Mechanical Turk (MTurk), Amazon’s crowdsourcing service, to collect data on demographics, interaction frequency, behavioral issues, and pet-owner bond. Although owners in cat-only households tended to report slightly higher bond scores with their cats ( μ SM = 30.34; μ Mturk = 28.32) than owners in mixed households ( μ SM = 29.33; μ Mturk = 27.42), the differences were small, and the association between household type and bond score was not significant ( p SM = 0.973, p MTurk = 0.124). Owners who engaged in more frequent active interactions with their cats had higher bond scores. These results indicate that spending more time engaging in active interactions with one’s cat is associated with a stronger bond, and the frequency of these interactions may be more important than the presence of a cohabiting dog.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating influences on pet attachment in France: Insights from the adaptation of the French Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale The impact of owner personality traits and cat lifestyle decisions on cat-related guilt Horse selection differs between secular and non-secular equine-assisted organizations For the love of acronyms: An analysis of terminology and acronyms used in AAI research 2013–2023 Using PARO, a robotic seal, to support people living with dementia: ‘what works’ in inpatient dementia care settings?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1