{"title":"探索狗对私人住宅中人猫关系的影响","authors":"Sara T. Clarkson, Lori R. Kogan, E. Grigg","doi":"10.1079/hai.2024.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Despite the growing numbers of dogs and cats cohabiting in US households, little research has focused on the influence of dogs on the human-animal bond of their feline roommates. The present study investigated whether cohabiting with a dog has an impact on the human-cat bond and the ways in which cats interact with humans. Based on existing knowledge of the differences between human-dog and human-cat interactions, we predicted that cats who have lived with a dog for at least 1 year will exhibit differences in the bond and interaction frequency with their owners. A 46-item survey was administered to 682 US cat owners via social media (SM) and Mechanical Turk (MTurk), Amazon’s crowdsourcing service, to collect data on demographics, interaction frequency, behavioral issues, and pet-owner bond. Although owners in cat-only households tended to report slightly higher bond scores with their cats (\n \n \n μ\n \n \n SM\n = 30.34;\n \n \n μ\n \n \n Mturk\n = 28.32) than owners in mixed households (\n \n \n μ\n \n \n SM\n = 29.33;\n \n \n μ\n \n \n Mturk\n = 27.42), the differences were small, and the association between household type and bond score was not significant (\n p\n SM\n = 0.973,\n p\n MTurk\n = 0.124). Owners who engaged in more frequent active interactions with their cats had higher bond scores. These results indicate that spending more time engaging in active interactions with one’s cat is associated with a stronger bond, and the frequency of these interactions may be more important than the presence of a cohabiting dog.\n","PeriodicalId":507269,"journal":{"name":"Human-Animal Interactions","volume":"67 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of dogs on the human-cat relationship in private homes\",\"authors\":\"Sara T. Clarkson, Lori R. Kogan, E. Grigg\",\"doi\":\"10.1079/hai.2024.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Despite the growing numbers of dogs and cats cohabiting in US households, little research has focused on the influence of dogs on the human-animal bond of their feline roommates. The present study investigated whether cohabiting with a dog has an impact on the human-cat bond and the ways in which cats interact with humans. Based on existing knowledge of the differences between human-dog and human-cat interactions, we predicted that cats who have lived with a dog for at least 1 year will exhibit differences in the bond and interaction frequency with their owners. A 46-item survey was administered to 682 US cat owners via social media (SM) and Mechanical Turk (MTurk), Amazon’s crowdsourcing service, to collect data on demographics, interaction frequency, behavioral issues, and pet-owner bond. Although owners in cat-only households tended to report slightly higher bond scores with their cats (\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n SM\\n = 30.34;\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n Mturk\\n = 28.32) than owners in mixed households (\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n SM\\n = 29.33;\\n \\n \\n μ\\n \\n \\n Mturk\\n = 27.42), the differences were small, and the association between household type and bond score was not significant (\\n p\\n SM\\n = 0.973,\\n p\\n MTurk\\n = 0.124). Owners who engaged in more frequent active interactions with their cats had higher bond scores. These results indicate that spending more time engaging in active interactions with one’s cat is associated with a stronger bond, and the frequency of these interactions may be more important than the presence of a cohabiting dog.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":507269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human-Animal Interactions\",\"volume\":\"67 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human-Animal Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2024.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-Animal Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2024.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管美国家庭中猫狗同居的数量越来越多,但很少有研究关注狗对猫室友的人猫关系的影响。本研究调查了与狗同居是否会影响人猫关系以及猫与人类互动的方式。根据现有的关于人狗互动和人猫互动之间差异的知识,我们预测与狗同居至少一年的猫在与主人的关系和互动频率上会表现出差异。我们通过社交媒体(SM)和亚马逊的众包服务 Mechanical Turk(MTurk)对 682 位美国猫咪主人进行了 46 个项目的调查,以收集有关人口统计学、互动频率、行为问题和宠物与主人关系的数据。虽然纯猫家庭的主人与猫咪的感情评分(μ SM = 30.34;μ Mturk = 28.32)往往略高于混合家庭的主人(μ SM = 29.33;μ Mturk = 27.42),但差异很小,而且家庭类型与感情评分之间的关系并不显著(p SM = 0.973,p MTurk = 0.124)。与猫咪进行更频繁的积极互动的主人的亲情得分更高。这些结果表明,花更多的时间与猫进行积极的互动与更强的亲情有关,而这些互动的频率可能比是否有同居的狗更重要。
Exploring the impact of dogs on the human-cat relationship in private homes
Despite the growing numbers of dogs and cats cohabiting in US households, little research has focused on the influence of dogs on the human-animal bond of their feline roommates. The present study investigated whether cohabiting with a dog has an impact on the human-cat bond and the ways in which cats interact with humans. Based on existing knowledge of the differences between human-dog and human-cat interactions, we predicted that cats who have lived with a dog for at least 1 year will exhibit differences in the bond and interaction frequency with their owners. A 46-item survey was administered to 682 US cat owners via social media (SM) and Mechanical Turk (MTurk), Amazon’s crowdsourcing service, to collect data on demographics, interaction frequency, behavioral issues, and pet-owner bond. Although owners in cat-only households tended to report slightly higher bond scores with their cats (
μ
SM
= 30.34;
μ
Mturk
= 28.32) than owners in mixed households (
μ
SM
= 29.33;
μ
Mturk
= 27.42), the differences were small, and the association between household type and bond score was not significant (
p
SM
= 0.973,
p
MTurk
= 0.124). Owners who engaged in more frequent active interactions with their cats had higher bond scores. These results indicate that spending more time engaging in active interactions with one’s cat is associated with a stronger bond, and the frequency of these interactions may be more important than the presence of a cohabiting dog.