骨髓增生异常肿瘤和急性髓性白血病的骨髓活检报告纳入世界卫生组织第五版和国际协调委员会 2022 年分类系统:ALLG/RCPA联合委员会共识建议

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Pathology Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.pathol.2024.02.002
Ashley P. Ng , Rebecca Adams , Ing Soo Tiong , Louise Seymour , Dipti Talaulikar , Emma Palfreyman , Anoop Enjeti , Courtney Tate
{"title":"骨髓增生异常肿瘤和急性髓性白血病的骨髓活检报告纳入世界卫生组织第五版和国际协调委员会 2022 年分类系统:ALLG/RCPA联合委员会共识建议","authors":"Ashley P. Ng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Adams ,&nbsp;Ing Soo Tiong ,&nbsp;Louise Seymour ,&nbsp;Dipti Talaulikar ,&nbsp;Emma Palfreyman ,&nbsp;Anoop Enjeti ,&nbsp;Courtney Tate","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The classification of myeloid neoplasms continues to evolve along with advances in molecular diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of disease. An approach for disease classification has been grounded in international consensus that has facilitated understanding, identification and management of molecularly heterogeneous entities, as well as enabled consistent patient stratification into clinical trials and clinical registries over time. The new World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) Clinical Advisory Committee releasing separate classification systems for myeloid neoplasms in 2022 precipitated some concern amongst haematopathology colleagues both locally and internationally. While both classifications emphasise molecular disease classification over the historical use of morphology, flow cytometry and cytogenetic based diagnostic methods, notable differences exist in how morphological, molecular and cytogenetic criteria are applied for defining myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemias (AML). Here we review the conceptual advances, diagnostic nuances, and molecular platforms required for the diagnosis of MDS and AML using the new WHO and ICC 2022 classifications. We provide consensus recommendations for reporting bone marrow biopsies. Additionally, we address the logistical challenges encountered implementing these changes into routine laboratory practice in alignment with the National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council reporting requirements for Australia and New Zealand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting bone marrow biopsies for myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukaemia incorporating WHO 5th edition and ICC 2022 classification systems: ALLG/RCPA joint committee consensus recommendations\",\"authors\":\"Ashley P. Ng ,&nbsp;Rebecca Adams ,&nbsp;Ing Soo Tiong ,&nbsp;Louise Seymour ,&nbsp;Dipti Talaulikar ,&nbsp;Emma Palfreyman ,&nbsp;Anoop Enjeti ,&nbsp;Courtney Tate\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The classification of myeloid neoplasms continues to evolve along with advances in molecular diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of disease. An approach for disease classification has been grounded in international consensus that has facilitated understanding, identification and management of molecularly heterogeneous entities, as well as enabled consistent patient stratification into clinical trials and clinical registries over time. The new World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) Clinical Advisory Committee releasing separate classification systems for myeloid neoplasms in 2022 precipitated some concern amongst haematopathology colleagues both locally and internationally. While both classifications emphasise molecular disease classification over the historical use of morphology, flow cytometry and cytogenetic based diagnostic methods, notable differences exist in how morphological, molecular and cytogenetic criteria are applied for defining myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemias (AML). Here we review the conceptual advances, diagnostic nuances, and molecular platforms required for the diagnosis of MDS and AML using the new WHO and ICC 2022 classifications. We provide consensus recommendations for reporting bone marrow biopsies. Additionally, we address the logistical challenges encountered implementing these changes into routine laboratory practice in alignment with the National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council reporting requirements for Australia and New Zealand.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524000862\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031302524000862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着分子诊断、风险分层和疾病治疗的进步,髓系肿瘤的分类也在不断发展。疾病分类的方法以国际共识为基础,有助于对分子异质性实体的理解、识别和管理,并随着时间的推移在临床试验和临床登记中对患者进行一致的分层。世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际共识分类(ICC)临床咨询委员会于2022年分别发布了新的骨髓性肿瘤分类系统,这引起了国内外血液病理学同行的关注。虽然这两个分类系统都强调分子疾病分类,而不是历史上使用的基于形态学、流式细胞术和细胞遗传学的诊断方法,但在如何应用形态学、分子和细胞遗传学标准来定义骨髓增生异常肿瘤(MDS)和急性髓系白血病(AML)方面存在显著差异。在此,我们回顾了概念上的进步、诊断上的细微差别以及使用新的 WHO 和 ICC 2022 分类诊断 MDS 和 AML 所需的分子平台。我们提供了骨髓活检报告的共识建议。此外,我们还讨论了根据澳大利亚和新西兰国家病理鉴定咨询委员会的报告要求将这些变化落实到常规实验室实践中所遇到的后勤挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reporting bone marrow biopsies for myelodysplastic neoplasms and acute myeloid leukaemia incorporating WHO 5th edition and ICC 2022 classification systems: ALLG/RCPA joint committee consensus recommendations

The classification of myeloid neoplasms continues to evolve along with advances in molecular diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of disease. An approach for disease classification has been grounded in international consensus that has facilitated understanding, identification and management of molecularly heterogeneous entities, as well as enabled consistent patient stratification into clinical trials and clinical registries over time. The new World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) Clinical Advisory Committee releasing separate classification systems for myeloid neoplasms in 2022 precipitated some concern amongst haematopathology colleagues both locally and internationally. While both classifications emphasise molecular disease classification over the historical use of morphology, flow cytometry and cytogenetic based diagnostic methods, notable differences exist in how morphological, molecular and cytogenetic criteria are applied for defining myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemias (AML). Here we review the conceptual advances, diagnostic nuances, and molecular platforms required for the diagnosis of MDS and AML using the new WHO and ICC 2022 classifications. We provide consensus recommendations for reporting bone marrow biopsies. Additionally, we address the logistical challenges encountered implementing these changes into routine laboratory practice in alignment with the National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council reporting requirements for Australia and New Zealand.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
期刊最新文献
Judicious use of precise fluorescence in situ hybridisation panels guided by population prevalence may assist pragmatic detection of clinically targetable Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukaemia fusions: a systematic review Frequent detection of herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus in samples submitted for monkeypox virus testing in New South Wales, Australia during the mpox outbreak 2022–2023 Ossifying fibromyxoid tumour with fibrosarcoma-like features and novel PHF1::HCFC1 gene fusion Mutations of cysB in urinary isolates of cysteine-requiring Escherichia coli Comparison of PD-L1 assays in head and neck carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1