如何协调?特殊教育和替代教育

Forum Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.09
Sally Tomlinson, Craig Johnston
{"title":"如何协调?特殊教育和替代教育","authors":"Sally Tomlinson, Craig Johnston","doi":"10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The English mass state education system, developing over 150 years, has created subsystems for children and young people who had difficulty in functioning at or beyond 'mainstream' schooling, or whose behaviour was deemed inappropriate. While many descriptions and labels proliferated\n in the education system, by 1981 children notionally had been categorised with 'special educational needs' (SEN) with disability added in 1995 (SEND) and/or were increasingly placed in what became alternative educational provisions (APs). By 2021, this dual subsystem was attempting to deal\n with around one and a half million children, a majority still in mainstream schooling in what was considered to be inclusion, others designated as 'high needs', mainly within (expensive) segregated special schools or units, and other children were subject to temporary or permanent exclusions\n from school. In March 2022, with a follow-up in 2023, the government, driven largely by financial considerations and a lack of oversight of existing provision, proposed that the expanding special educational needs and AP subsystems be formally linked. This article examines these emerging proposals\n through an historical lens, and considers what these may mean for teachers, associated professionals and the children.","PeriodicalId":509128,"journal":{"name":"Forum","volume":"29 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joining the dots? Special education and alternative provision\",\"authors\":\"Sally Tomlinson, Craig Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The English mass state education system, developing over 150 years, has created subsystems for children and young people who had difficulty in functioning at or beyond 'mainstream' schooling, or whose behaviour was deemed inappropriate. While many descriptions and labels proliferated\\n in the education system, by 1981 children notionally had been categorised with 'special educational needs' (SEN) with disability added in 1995 (SEND) and/or were increasingly placed in what became alternative educational provisions (APs). By 2021, this dual subsystem was attempting to deal\\n with around one and a half million children, a majority still in mainstream schooling in what was considered to be inclusion, others designated as 'high needs', mainly within (expensive) segregated special schools or units, and other children were subject to temporary or permanent exclusions\\n from school. In March 2022, with a follow-up in 2023, the government, driven largely by financial considerations and a lack of oversight of existing provision, proposed that the expanding special educational needs and AP subsystems be formally linked. This article examines these emerging proposals\\n through an historical lens, and considers what these may mean for teachers, associated professionals and the children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":509128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forum\",\"volume\":\"29 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/forum.2024.66.1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国的公立教育系统经过 150 多年的发展,已经为那些在 "主流 "学校教育中或 学校教育之外难以发挥作用,或其行为被视为不当的儿童和青少年建立了子系统。虽然教育系统中的描述和标签层出不穷,但到 1981 年,儿童从概念上被归类为有 "特殊教育需要"(SEN),1995 年又增加了残疾(SEND),并且/或者越来越多的儿童被安置在替代教育机构(APs)中。到 2021 年,这个双重子系统正试图处理约 150 万名儿童的问题,其中大多数仍在主流学校接受被认为是全纳的教育,其他儿童被指定为 "高需求",主要在(昂贵的)隔离特殊学校或单位接受教育,其他儿童则被暂时或永久地排除在学校之外。2022 年 3 月,政府主要出于财政考虑和对现有提供情况缺乏监督的原因,提议将不断扩大的特殊教育需求和学前教育子系统正式联系起来,并在 2023 年采取后续行动。本文从历史的角度审视了这些新出现的建议,并思考了这些建议对教师、相关专业人员和儿童可能意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Joining the dots? Special education and alternative provision
The English mass state education system, developing over 150 years, has created subsystems for children and young people who had difficulty in functioning at or beyond 'mainstream' schooling, or whose behaviour was deemed inappropriate. While many descriptions and labels proliferated in the education system, by 1981 children notionally had been categorised with 'special educational needs' (SEN) with disability added in 1995 (SEND) and/or were increasingly placed in what became alternative educational provisions (APs). By 2021, this dual subsystem was attempting to deal with around one and a half million children, a majority still in mainstream schooling in what was considered to be inclusion, others designated as 'high needs', mainly within (expensive) segregated special schools or units, and other children were subject to temporary or permanent exclusions from school. In March 2022, with a follow-up in 2023, the government, driven largely by financial considerations and a lack of oversight of existing provision, proposed that the expanding special educational needs and AP subsystems be formally linked. This article examines these emerging proposals through an historical lens, and considers what these may mean for teachers, associated professionals and the children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AI-based analysis of cancer registry data Stengths and limitations of cancer research in Germany Social law issues in oncology: a question of social participation NIS-Studie zur Instillation von Mitomycin C Patient monitoring with patient-reported outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1