对右心室与肺动脉耦合的侵入性评估可提高经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年死亡率的预测并预知主动脉瓣外心脏损伤的持续性

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Structural Heart Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2024.100282
Mark Lachmann MD , Amelie Hesse , Teresa Trenkwalder MD , Erion Xhepa MD, PhD , Tobias Rheude MD , Moritz von Scheidt MD , Héctor Alfonso Alvarez Covarrubias MD , Elena Rippen , Oksana Hramiak MD , Costanza Pellegrini MD , Tibor Schuster PhD , Shinsuke Yuasa MD, PhD , Heribert Schunkert MD , Adnan Kastrati MD , Christian Kupatt MD , Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz MD , Michael Joner MD
{"title":"对右心室与肺动脉耦合的侵入性评估可提高经导管主动脉瓣置换术后1年死亡率的预测并预知主动脉瓣外心脏损伤的持续性","authors":"Mark Lachmann MD ,&nbsp;Amelie Hesse ,&nbsp;Teresa Trenkwalder MD ,&nbsp;Erion Xhepa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tobias Rheude MD ,&nbsp;Moritz von Scheidt MD ,&nbsp;Héctor Alfonso Alvarez Covarrubias MD ,&nbsp;Elena Rippen ,&nbsp;Oksana Hramiak MD ,&nbsp;Costanza Pellegrini MD ,&nbsp;Tibor Schuster PhD ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Yuasa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Heribert Schunkert MD ,&nbsp;Adnan Kastrati MD ,&nbsp;Christian Kupatt MD ,&nbsp;Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz MD ,&nbsp;Michael Joner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2024.100282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The interplay between the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery, known as right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling, is crucial for assessing right ventricular systolic function against the afterload from the pulmonary circulation. Pulmonary artery pressure levels are ideally measured by right heart catheterization. Yet, echocardiography represents the most utilized method for evaluating pulmonary artery pressure levels, albeit with limitations in accuracy. This study therefore aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling expressed as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) related to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) levels measured by right heart catheterization (TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub>) or estimated by transthoracic echocardiography (TAPSE/sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub>) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data from a bicentric registry, this study compares TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> vs. TAPSE/sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub> in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 333 patients with complete echocardiography and right heart catheterization data obtained before TAVR, their mean age was 79.8 ± 6.74 years, 39.6% were female, and general 1-year survival was 89.8%. sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> and sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub> showed only moderate correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient <em>R</em>: 0.53, <em>p</em> value: &lt;0.0001). TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> was superior to TAPSE/sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub> in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVR (area under the curve: 0.662 vs. 0.569, <em>p</em> value: 0.025). Patients with reduced TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> levels (&lt; 0.365 mm/mmHg) evidenced significantly lower 1-year survival rates than patients with preserved TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> levels (81.8 vs. 93.6%, <em>p</em> value: 0.001; hazard ratio for 1-year mortality: 3.09 [95% confidence interval: 1.55-6.17]). Echocardiographic follow-up data revealed that patients with reduced RV-PA coupling suffer from persistent right ventricular dysfunction (TAPSE: 16.6 ± 4.05 mm vs. 21.6 ± 4.81 mm in patients with preserved RV-PA coupling) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (diagnosed in 19.7 vs. 6.58% in patients with preserved RV-PA coupling).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RV-PA coupling expressed as TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> can refine stratification of severe aortic stenosis patients into low-risk and high-risk cohorts for mortality after TAVR. Moreover, it can help to anticipate persistent extra-aortic valve cardiac damage, which will demand further treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"8 3","pages":"Article 100282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624000034/pdfft?md5=5f97f85c49901f16d7ee37b81b333d78&pid=1-s2.0-S2474870624000034-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invasive Assessment of Right Ventricular to Pulmonary Artery Coupling Improves 1-year Mortality Prediction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Anticipates the Persistence of Extra-Aortic Valve Cardiac Damage\",\"authors\":\"Mark Lachmann MD ,&nbsp;Amelie Hesse ,&nbsp;Teresa Trenkwalder MD ,&nbsp;Erion Xhepa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tobias Rheude MD ,&nbsp;Moritz von Scheidt MD ,&nbsp;Héctor Alfonso Alvarez Covarrubias MD ,&nbsp;Elena Rippen ,&nbsp;Oksana Hramiak MD ,&nbsp;Costanza Pellegrini MD ,&nbsp;Tibor Schuster PhD ,&nbsp;Shinsuke Yuasa MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Heribert Schunkert MD ,&nbsp;Adnan Kastrati MD ,&nbsp;Christian Kupatt MD ,&nbsp;Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz MD ,&nbsp;Michael Joner MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.shj.2024.100282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The interplay between the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery, known as right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling, is crucial for assessing right ventricular systolic function against the afterload from the pulmonary circulation. Pulmonary artery pressure levels are ideally measured by right heart catheterization. Yet, echocardiography represents the most utilized method for evaluating pulmonary artery pressure levels, albeit with limitations in accuracy. This study therefore aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling expressed as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) related to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) levels measured by right heart catheterization (TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub>) or estimated by transthoracic echocardiography (TAPSE/sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub>) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data from a bicentric registry, this study compares TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> vs. TAPSE/sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub> in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 333 patients with complete echocardiography and right heart catheterization data obtained before TAVR, their mean age was 79.8 ± 6.74 years, 39.6% were female, and general 1-year survival was 89.8%. sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> and sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub> showed only moderate correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient <em>R</em>: 0.53, <em>p</em> value: &lt;0.0001). TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> was superior to TAPSE/sPAP<sub>echocardiography</sub> in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVR (area under the curve: 0.662 vs. 0.569, <em>p</em> value: 0.025). Patients with reduced TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> levels (&lt; 0.365 mm/mmHg) evidenced significantly lower 1-year survival rates than patients with preserved TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> levels (81.8 vs. 93.6%, <em>p</em> value: 0.001; hazard ratio for 1-year mortality: 3.09 [95% confidence interval: 1.55-6.17]). Echocardiographic follow-up data revealed that patients with reduced RV-PA coupling suffer from persistent right ventricular dysfunction (TAPSE: 16.6 ± 4.05 mm vs. 21.6 ± 4.81 mm in patients with preserved RV-PA coupling) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (diagnosed in 19.7 vs. 6.58% in patients with preserved RV-PA coupling).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>RV-PA coupling expressed as TAPSE/sPAP<sub>invasive</sub> can refine stratification of severe aortic stenosis patients into low-risk and high-risk cohorts for mortality after TAVR. Moreover, it can help to anticipate persistent extra-aortic valve cardiac damage, which will demand further treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Heart\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624000034/pdfft?md5=5f97f85c49901f16d7ee37b81b333d78&pid=1-s2.0-S2474870624000034-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624000034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870624000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景右心室与肺动脉之间的相互作用,即右心室与肺动脉(RV-PA)耦合,对于评估右心室收缩功能与肺循环后负荷的关系至关重要。肺动脉压力水平最好通过右心导管检查来测量。然而,超声心动图是评估肺动脉压力水平最常用的方法,但其准确性有一定的局限性。因此,本研究旨在评估右心室与肺动脉(RV- PA)耦合的预后意义。PA)耦合的预后意义。在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,以三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)表示的耦合与右心导管测量(TAPSE/sPAPinvasive)或经胸超声心动图估测(TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography)的肺动脉收缩压(sPAP)水平相关。方法利用双中心登记的数据,本研究比较了 TAPSE/sPAPinvasive 与 TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography 在预测 TAVR 术后 1 年全因死亡率方面的作用。结果在 TAVR 术前获得完整超声心动图和右心导管检查数据的 333 例患者中,平均年龄为 79.sPAP无创和sPAP超声心动图仅显示出中等相关性(皮尔逊相关系数R:0.53,P值:<0.0001)。在预测 TAVR 术后 1 年全因死亡率方面,TAPSE/sPAPinvasive 优于 TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography(曲线下面积:0.662 对 0.569,P 值:0.025)。TAPSE/sPAPinvasive水平降低(< 0.365 mm/mmHg)的患者的1年生存率明显低于TAPSE/sPAPinvasive水平保持不变的患者(81.8% vs. 93.6%,P值:0.001;1年死亡率的危险比:3.09 [95%置信区间:1.55-6.17])。超声心动图随访数据显示,RV-PA耦合降低的患者存在持续的右心室功能障碍(TAPSE:16.6 ± 4.05 mm,而 RV-PA 耦合保留的患者为 21.6 ± 4.81 mm)和严重的三尖瓣反流(诊断为三尖瓣反流的患者为 19.7%,而诊断为三尖瓣反流的患者为 6.58%)。结论以 TAPSE/sPAPinvasive 表示的 RV-PA 耦合可将重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者细化为 TAVR 后死亡率的低风险和高风险群组。此外,它还有助于预测需要进一步治疗的持续性主动脉瓣外心脏损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Invasive Assessment of Right Ventricular to Pulmonary Artery Coupling Improves 1-year Mortality Prediction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Anticipates the Persistence of Extra-Aortic Valve Cardiac Damage

Background

The interplay between the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery, known as right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling, is crucial for assessing right ventricular systolic function against the afterload from the pulmonary circulation. Pulmonary artery pressure levels are ideally measured by right heart catheterization. Yet, echocardiography represents the most utilized method for evaluating pulmonary artery pressure levels, albeit with limitations in accuracy. This study therefore aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of right ventricular to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling expressed as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) related to systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) levels measured by right heart catheterization (TAPSE/sPAPinvasive) or estimated by transthoracic echocardiography (TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods

Using data from a bicentric registry, this study compares TAPSE/sPAPinvasive vs. TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVR.

Results

Among 333 patients with complete echocardiography and right heart catheterization data obtained before TAVR, their mean age was 79.8 ± 6.74 years, 39.6% were female, and general 1-year survival was 89.8%. sPAPinvasive and sPAPechocardiography showed only moderate correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient R: 0.53, p value: <0.0001). TAPSE/sPAPinvasive was superior to TAPSE/sPAPechocardiography in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality after TAVR (area under the curve: 0.662 vs. 0.569, p value: 0.025). Patients with reduced TAPSE/sPAPinvasive levels (< 0.365 mm/mmHg) evidenced significantly lower 1-year survival rates than patients with preserved TAPSE/sPAPinvasive levels (81.8 vs. 93.6%, p value: 0.001; hazard ratio for 1-year mortality: 3.09 [95% confidence interval: 1.55-6.17]). Echocardiographic follow-up data revealed that patients with reduced RV-PA coupling suffer from persistent right ventricular dysfunction (TAPSE: 16.6 ± 4.05 mm vs. 21.6 ± 4.81 mm in patients with preserved RV-PA coupling) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (diagnosed in 19.7 vs. 6.58% in patients with preserved RV-PA coupling).

Conclusions

RV-PA coupling expressed as TAPSE/sPAPinvasive can refine stratification of severe aortic stenosis patients into low-risk and high-risk cohorts for mortality after TAVR. Moreover, it can help to anticipate persistent extra-aortic valve cardiac damage, which will demand further treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Moderate Aortic Stenosis—Advanced Imaging, Risk Assessment, and Treatment Strategies The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Conduction Study: The Value of the His-Ventricular Interval in Risk Stratification for Post-TAVR Atrioventricular-Block Large Field-of-View Intravascular Ultrasound for Mitral and Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Guidance: A Pilot Study Quantitative Aortography Analysis of JenaValve’s Trilogy Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation or Stenosis A Novel Risk Score Facilitates Femoral Artery Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Passage-Puncture Score
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1