短期总暴露和野火PM2.5暴露对工作损失的健康和经济成本估算:使用2015-2018年连续的加州健康访谈调查(CHIS)数据

Ying-Ying Meng, Yu Yu, Diane A Garcia-Gonzales, Mohammad Z. Al‐Hamdan, M. Marlier, Joseph L Wilkins, Ninez Ponce, Michael Jerrett
{"title":"短期总暴露和野火PM2.5暴露对工作损失的健康和经济成本估算:使用2015-2018年连续的加州健康访谈调查(CHIS)数据","authors":"Ying-Ying Meng, Yu Yu, Diane A Garcia-Gonzales, Mohammad Z. Al‐Hamdan, M. Marlier, Joseph L Wilkins, Ninez Ponce, Michael Jerrett","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To help determine the health protectiveness of government regulations and policies for air pollutant control for Americans, our study aimed to investigate the health and economic impacts of work loss due to sickness associated with daily all-source and wildfire-specific PM2.5(particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm) exposures in California.We linked the 2015–2018 California Health Interview Survey respondents’ geocoded home addresses to daily PM2.5estimated by satellites and atmospheric modelling simulations and wildfire-related PM2.5from Community Multiscale Air Quality models. We calculated and applied the coefficient for the association between daily PM2.5exposure and work loss from regression analyses to the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program—Community Edition (BenMAP-CE) platform to assess the health and economic impacts of PM2.5exposure on work loss due to sickness.We observed that each 1 µg/m3increase in daily total PM2.5exposure will lead to about 1 million days of work loss per year ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 million person-days, and the related economic loss was $310–390 million. Wildfire smoke alone could contribute to 0.7–2.6 million work-loss days with a related economic loss of $129–521 million per year in 2015–2018. Using the function coefficient in the current BenMAP, the excess work-loss days due to sickness was about 250 000 days and the estimated economic loss was about $45–50 million for each 1 µg/m3increase in daily total PM2.5exposure, and wildfire smoke alone would lead to 0.17–0.67 million work-loss days with related economic loss of $31–128 million per year during the same period.Both conventional and wildfire-specific sources of PM2.5produced substantial work loss and cost in California. Updating the current BenMAP-CE calculations for work-loss days will be essential in quantifying the current health impacts of PM2.5to help inform the policies and regulations to protect public health.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health and economic cost estimates of short-term total and wildfire PM2.5exposure on work loss: using the consecutive California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) data 2015–2018\",\"authors\":\"Ying-Ying Meng, Yu Yu, Diane A Garcia-Gonzales, Mohammad Z. Al‐Hamdan, M. Marlier, Joseph L Wilkins, Ninez Ponce, Michael Jerrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To help determine the health protectiveness of government regulations and policies for air pollutant control for Americans, our study aimed to investigate the health and economic impacts of work loss due to sickness associated with daily all-source and wildfire-specific PM2.5(particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm) exposures in California.We linked the 2015–2018 California Health Interview Survey respondents’ geocoded home addresses to daily PM2.5estimated by satellites and atmospheric modelling simulations and wildfire-related PM2.5from Community Multiscale Air Quality models. We calculated and applied the coefficient for the association between daily PM2.5exposure and work loss from regression analyses to the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program—Community Edition (BenMAP-CE) platform to assess the health and economic impacts of PM2.5exposure on work loss due to sickness.We observed that each 1 µg/m3increase in daily total PM2.5exposure will lead to about 1 million days of work loss per year ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 million person-days, and the related economic loss was $310–390 million. Wildfire smoke alone could contribute to 0.7–2.6 million work-loss days with a related economic loss of $129–521 million per year in 2015–2018. Using the function coefficient in the current BenMAP, the excess work-loss days due to sickness was about 250 000 days and the estimated economic loss was about $45–50 million for each 1 µg/m3increase in daily total PM2.5exposure, and wildfire smoke alone would lead to 0.17–0.67 million work-loss days with related economic loss of $31–128 million per year during the same period.Both conventional and wildfire-specific sources of PM2.5produced substantial work loss and cost in California. Updating the current BenMAP-CE calculations for work-loss days will be essential in quantifying the current health impacts of PM2.5to help inform the policies and regulations to protect public health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了帮助确定政府控制空气污染物的法规和政策对美国人健康的保护作用,我们的研究旨在调查在加利福尼亚州每天暴露于所有来源和特定野火的 PM2.5(空气动力学直径小于 2.5 μm 的颗粒物)对健康和经济的影响。我们将 2015-2018 年加州健康访谈调查受访者的地理编码家庭住址与卫星和大气模型模拟估算的每日 PM2.5 以及社区多尺度空气质量模型中与野火相关的 PM2.5 联系起来。我们计算了每日 PM2.5 暴露与工作损失之间的关联系数,并将回归分析应用于环境效益绘图和分析程序-社区版(BenMAP-CE)平台,以评估 PM2.5 暴露对健康和经济的影响。我们观察到,PM2.5 暴露的日总量每增加 1 µg/m3 将导致每年约 100 万个工作日的损失,从 110 万到 160 万个人日不等,相关的经济损失为 3.1 亿到 3.9 亿美元。在 2015-2018 年期间,仅野火烟雾一项就可能导致 70 万至 260 万个工作日的损失,相关经济损失为每年 1.29 亿至 5.21 亿美元。使用当前BenMAP中的函数系数,PM2.5日总暴露量每增加1微克/立方米,因病导致的超额工作损失天数约为25万天,估计经济损失约为4500万-5000万美元,而在同一时期,仅野火烟雾就会导致170万-67万个工作损失天数,相关经济损失为每年3100万-1.28亿美元。更新当前 BenMAP-CE 计算的工作损失天数对于量化 PM2.5 当前的健康影响至关重要,有助于为保护公众健康的政策和法规提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health and economic cost estimates of short-term total and wildfire PM2.5exposure on work loss: using the consecutive California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) data 2015–2018
To help determine the health protectiveness of government regulations and policies for air pollutant control for Americans, our study aimed to investigate the health and economic impacts of work loss due to sickness associated with daily all-source and wildfire-specific PM2.5(particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm) exposures in California.We linked the 2015–2018 California Health Interview Survey respondents’ geocoded home addresses to daily PM2.5estimated by satellites and atmospheric modelling simulations and wildfire-related PM2.5from Community Multiscale Air Quality models. We calculated and applied the coefficient for the association between daily PM2.5exposure and work loss from regression analyses to the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program—Community Edition (BenMAP-CE) platform to assess the health and economic impacts of PM2.5exposure on work loss due to sickness.We observed that each 1 µg/m3increase in daily total PM2.5exposure will lead to about 1 million days of work loss per year ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 million person-days, and the related economic loss was $310–390 million. Wildfire smoke alone could contribute to 0.7–2.6 million work-loss days with a related economic loss of $129–521 million per year in 2015–2018. Using the function coefficient in the current BenMAP, the excess work-loss days due to sickness was about 250 000 days and the estimated economic loss was about $45–50 million for each 1 µg/m3increase in daily total PM2.5exposure, and wildfire smoke alone would lead to 0.17–0.67 million work-loss days with related economic loss of $31–128 million per year during the same period.Both conventional and wildfire-specific sources of PM2.5produced substantial work loss and cost in California. Updating the current BenMAP-CE calculations for work-loss days will be essential in quantifying the current health impacts of PM2.5to help inform the policies and regulations to protect public health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial health stigma related to COVID-19 disease among COVID-19 patients in Jordan: a comparative study Evaluating and mapping the evidence that screening for diabetic foot disease meets the criteria for population-wide screening: a scoping review Effectiveness of direct patient outreach with a narrative naloxone and overdose prevention video to patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy in the USA: the Naloxone Navigator randomised clinical trial Social media use and anxiety levels among school adolescents: a cross-sectional study in Kathmandu, Nepal Community childhood obesity assessment in elementary school, anthropometric indices as screening tools: a community cross-sectional study in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1