对比增强 CT 与核磁共振成像可准确诊断壁增厚型胆囊癌

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101397
Daneshwari Kalage , Pankaj Gupta , Ajay Gulati , Kakivaya P. Reddy , Kritika Sharma , Ati Thakur , Thakur D. Yadav , Vikas Gupta , Lileswar Kaman , Ritambhra Nada , Harjeet Singh , Santosh Irrinki , Parikshaa Gupta , Chandan K. Das , Usha Dutta , Manavjit Sandhu
{"title":"对比增强 CT 与核磁共振成像可准确诊断壁增厚型胆囊癌","authors":"Daneshwari Kalage ,&nbsp;Pankaj Gupta ,&nbsp;Ajay Gulati ,&nbsp;Kakivaya P. Reddy ,&nbsp;Kritika Sharma ,&nbsp;Ati Thakur ,&nbsp;Thakur D. Yadav ,&nbsp;Vikas Gupta ,&nbsp;Lileswar Kaman ,&nbsp;Ritambhra Nada ,&nbsp;Harjeet Singh ,&nbsp;Santosh Irrinki ,&nbsp;Parikshaa Gupta ,&nbsp;Chandan K. Das ,&nbsp;Usha Dutta ,&nbsp;Manavjit Sandhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (<em>P</em> = 0.006, &lt;0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (<em>P</em> = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697–1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631–1.000).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast Enhanced CT Versus MRI for Accurate Diagnosis of Wall-thickening Type Gallbladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Daneshwari Kalage ,&nbsp;Pankaj Gupta ,&nbsp;Ajay Gulati ,&nbsp;Kakivaya P. Reddy ,&nbsp;Kritika Sharma ,&nbsp;Ati Thakur ,&nbsp;Thakur D. Yadav ,&nbsp;Vikas Gupta ,&nbsp;Lileswar Kaman ,&nbsp;Ritambhra Nada ,&nbsp;Harjeet Singh ,&nbsp;Santosh Irrinki ,&nbsp;Parikshaa Gupta ,&nbsp;Chandan K. Das ,&nbsp;Usha Dutta ,&nbsp;Manavjit Sandhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (<em>P</em> = 0.006, &lt;0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (<em>P</em> = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697–1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631–1.000).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:壁增厚型胆囊癌(GBC)的诊断具有挑战性。计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)是评估胆囊壁增厚的常用方法。目的我们旨在比较 CT 和 MRI 在诊断胆囊壁增厚型 GBC 时的诊断准确性。材料和方法这项前瞻性研究包括疑似胆囊壁增厚型 GBC 的连续患者,他们在术前接受了对比增强 CT 和 MRI 检查。最终诊断以切除胆囊病变的组织病理学为依据。两名放射科医生独立审查了 CT 和 MRI 检查中胆囊壁增厚的特征。结果共纳入 33 例患者(恶性 13 例,良性 20 例)。CT 结果均与 GBC 无明显关联。然而,在核磁共振成像中,异质强化、与肝脏的界面不清晰和弥散受限与恶性病变显著相关(P = 0.006、<0.001 和 0.005,分别为 0.006、<0.001 和 0.005),而壁内囊肿与良性病变显著相关(P = 0.012)。在所有核磁共振成像结果中,观察者之间的一致性都非常好(kappa = 0.697-1.000)。结论这些研究结果表明,对于疑似胃壁增厚型 GBC 患者,MRI 可能比 CT 更受青睐。然而,更大规模的多中心研究必须证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contrast Enhanced CT Versus MRI for Accurate Diagnosis of Wall-thickening Type Gallbladder Cancer

Introduction

Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.

Aim

We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.

Materials and methods

This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.

Results

Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (P = 0.006, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (P = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697–1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631–1.000).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Issue Highlights Evolving Global Etiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Insights and Trends for 2024 Role of Plasma Exchange and Combining Therapies in Dengue-Associated Acute Liver Failure: A Systematic Review of Individual Cases Serum CYFRA 21-1 and CK19-2G2 as Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatitis C–related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Egyptians: A Prospective Study Prediction Modelling for Gastroesophageal Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Using Four-dimensional Flow MRI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1