文章:在 "友商 "和 "近岸外包 "时代,社区同意标准支离破碎

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2024033
P. Narang
{"title":"文章:在 \"友商 \"和 \"近岸外包 \"时代,社区同意标准支离破碎","authors":"P. Narang","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2024033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent developments in clean energy supply chain amidst the geopolitical crisis have resulted in the friend shoring and nearshoring measures in the clean energy supply chain. Clean energy supply chain is susceptible to Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) risks, particularly resistance from the local communities against the critical minerals mining/exploration projects, due to policy gaps in the legislative framework regarding the community engagement standard and procedures. In context of friend shoring and nearshoring measures, this gap may get widened in the States with critical mineral resources. The article will track the development of the ESG standards pertaining to community engagement at the multilateral forums and the multilateral stakeholder initiative forums. Moreover, the article will analyse the gaps in ESG performance of the mining sector, particularly parameters of the community engagement. Further, the article will identify issues with the current initiatives under trade and economic cooperation agreements and bilateral investment treaties toward ensuring the community consent standards by extractive industry, specifically the mining of critical minerals for clean energy development. The article will conclude that fragmentation of the community consent standard has resulted in widening of ESG risks for investors and host states in the critical mineral sector. Accordingly, the article recommends that host states frame legislative framework for this sector by balancing interest of local communities with sound business environment for the investors.\nFriendshoring, Nearshoring, Electric Vehicle, Environment, Social and Governance, Trade Agreements, Free Prior and Informed Consent, Community Consent Standard, Investor State Dispute Settlement.","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Article: Fragmentation of Community Consent Standard in the Era of Friendshoring and Nearshoring\",\"authors\":\"P. Narang\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2024033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent developments in clean energy supply chain amidst the geopolitical crisis have resulted in the friend shoring and nearshoring measures in the clean energy supply chain. Clean energy supply chain is susceptible to Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) risks, particularly resistance from the local communities against the critical minerals mining/exploration projects, due to policy gaps in the legislative framework regarding the community engagement standard and procedures. In context of friend shoring and nearshoring measures, this gap may get widened in the States with critical mineral resources. The article will track the development of the ESG standards pertaining to community engagement at the multilateral forums and the multilateral stakeholder initiative forums. Moreover, the article will analyse the gaps in ESG performance of the mining sector, particularly parameters of the community engagement. Further, the article will identify issues with the current initiatives under trade and economic cooperation agreements and bilateral investment treaties toward ensuring the community consent standards by extractive industry, specifically the mining of critical minerals for clean energy development. The article will conclude that fragmentation of the community consent standard has resulted in widening of ESG risks for investors and host states in the critical mineral sector. Accordingly, the article recommends that host states frame legislative framework for this sector by balancing interest of local communities with sound business environment for the investors.\\nFriendshoring, Nearshoring, Electric Vehicle, Environment, Social and Governance, Trade Agreements, Free Prior and Informed Consent, Community Consent Standard, Investor State Dispute Settlement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2024033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2024033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在地缘政治危机的背景下,清洁能源供应链的最新发展导致清洁能源供应链中的友商转移和近郊转移措施。清洁能源供应链很容易受到环境、社会和治理(ESG)风险的影响,特别是当地社区对重要矿产开采/勘探项目的抵制,原因是立法框架在社区参与标准和程序方面存在政策空白。在实施友邦转移和近岸转移措施的背景下,这种差距可能会在拥有重要矿产资源的国家进一步扩大。本文将在多边论坛和多边利益相关者倡议论坛上跟踪与社区参与有关的环境、社会和治理标准的发展情况。此外,文章还将分析采矿业在环境、社会和治理方面的表现差距,特别是社区参与的参数。此外,文章还将指出目前在贸易和经济合作协定以及双边投资条约下为确保采掘业的社区同意标准而采取的举措所存在的问题,特别是在为清洁能源开发而开采关键矿物方面。文章将得出结论,社区同意标准的分散导致关键矿产部门的投资者和东道国的环境、社会和治理风险扩大。因此,文章建议东道国为该行业制定立法框架,平衡当地社区的利益和投资者的良好商业环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Article: Fragmentation of Community Consent Standard in the Era of Friendshoring and Nearshoring
Recent developments in clean energy supply chain amidst the geopolitical crisis have resulted in the friend shoring and nearshoring measures in the clean energy supply chain. Clean energy supply chain is susceptible to Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) risks, particularly resistance from the local communities against the critical minerals mining/exploration projects, due to policy gaps in the legislative framework regarding the community engagement standard and procedures. In context of friend shoring and nearshoring measures, this gap may get widened in the States with critical mineral resources. The article will track the development of the ESG standards pertaining to community engagement at the multilateral forums and the multilateral stakeholder initiative forums. Moreover, the article will analyse the gaps in ESG performance of the mining sector, particularly parameters of the community engagement. Further, the article will identify issues with the current initiatives under trade and economic cooperation agreements and bilateral investment treaties toward ensuring the community consent standards by extractive industry, specifically the mining of critical minerals for clean energy development. The article will conclude that fragmentation of the community consent standard has resulted in widening of ESG risks for investors and host states in the critical mineral sector. Accordingly, the article recommends that host states frame legislative framework for this sector by balancing interest of local communities with sound business environment for the investors. Friendshoring, Nearshoring, Electric Vehicle, Environment, Social and Governance, Trade Agreements, Free Prior and Informed Consent, Community Consent Standard, Investor State Dispute Settlement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
The EU 11th and 12th Packages of Sanctions Against Russia: How Far is the EU Willing to Go Extraterritorially? Special Procedures the Responsible Person(s): What Would Change under the EU Commission’s Reform Proposal? Positioning African Maritime Services as Key Enablers of the Emerging Single African Market Responding to the EU Green Deal: A Proactive Approach to Trade and Green Industrial Policy in Africa Navigating Digital Sovereignty: Implications for African Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1