寻找教师教育中的人工智能(AI)素养:范围审查

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers and Education Open Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169
Katarina Sperling , Carl-Johan Stenberg , Cormac McGrath , Anna Åkerfeldt , Fredrik Heintz , Linnéa Stenliden
{"title":"寻找教师教育中的人工智能(AI)素养:范围审查","authors":"Katarina Sperling ,&nbsp;Carl-Johan Stenberg ,&nbsp;Cormac McGrath ,&nbsp;Anna Åkerfeldt ,&nbsp;Fredrik Heintz ,&nbsp;Linnéa Stenliden","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy has recently emerged on the educational agenda raising expectations on teachers’ and teacher educators’ professional knowledge. This scoping review examines how the scientific literature conceptualises AI literacy in relation to teachers’ different forms of professional knowledge relevant for Teacher Education (TE). The search strategy included papers and proceedings from 2000 to 2023 related to AI literacy and TE as well as the intersection of AI and teaching. Thirty-four papers were included in the analysis. The Aristotelian concepts <em>episteme</em> (theoretical-scientific knowledge), <em>techne</em> (practical-productive knowledge), and <em>phronesis</em> (professional judgement) were used as a lens to capture implicit and explicit dimensions of teachers’ professional knowledge. Results indicate that AI literacy is a globally emerging research topic in education but almost absent in the context of TE. The literature covers many different topics and draws on different methodological approaches. Computer science and exploratory teaching approaches influence the type of epistemic, practical, and ethical knowledge. Currently, teachers’ professional knowledge is not broadly addressed or captured in the research. Questions of ethics are predominantly addressed as a matter of understanding technical configurations of data-driven AI technologies. Teachers’ practical knowledge tends to translate into the adoption of digital resources for teaching about AI or the integration of AI EdTech into teaching. By identifying several research gaps, particularly concerning teachers' practical and ethical knowledge, this paper adds to a more comprehensive understanding of AI literacy in teaching and can contribute to a more well-informed AI literacy education in TE as well as laying the ground for future research related to teachers’ professional knowledge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000107/pdfft?md5=b465c6247dde68f6c2a293652be6eaa7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000107-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Sperling ,&nbsp;Carl-Johan Stenberg ,&nbsp;Cormac McGrath ,&nbsp;Anna Åkerfeldt ,&nbsp;Fredrik Heintz ,&nbsp;Linnéa Stenliden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy has recently emerged on the educational agenda raising expectations on teachers’ and teacher educators’ professional knowledge. This scoping review examines how the scientific literature conceptualises AI literacy in relation to teachers’ different forms of professional knowledge relevant for Teacher Education (TE). The search strategy included papers and proceedings from 2000 to 2023 related to AI literacy and TE as well as the intersection of AI and teaching. Thirty-four papers were included in the analysis. The Aristotelian concepts <em>episteme</em> (theoretical-scientific knowledge), <em>techne</em> (practical-productive knowledge), and <em>phronesis</em> (professional judgement) were used as a lens to capture implicit and explicit dimensions of teachers’ professional knowledge. Results indicate that AI literacy is a globally emerging research topic in education but almost absent in the context of TE. The literature covers many different topics and draws on different methodological approaches. Computer science and exploratory teaching approaches influence the type of epistemic, practical, and ethical knowledge. Currently, teachers’ professional knowledge is not broadly addressed or captured in the research. Questions of ethics are predominantly addressed as a matter of understanding technical configurations of data-driven AI technologies. Teachers’ practical knowledge tends to translate into the adoption of digital resources for teaching about AI or the integration of AI EdTech into teaching. By identifying several research gaps, particularly concerning teachers' practical and ethical knowledge, this paper adds to a more comprehensive understanding of AI literacy in teaching and can contribute to a more well-informed AI literacy education in TE as well as laying the ground for future research related to teachers’ professional knowledge.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000107/pdfft?md5=b465c6247dde68f6c2a293652be6eaa7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000107-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)素养最近出现在教育议程上,提高了人们对教师和教师教育者专业知识的期望。本范围审查研究了科学文献如何将人工智能素养与教师教育(TE)相关的不同形式的专业知识联系起来。搜索策略包括 2000 年至 2023 年与人工智能素养和教师教育以及人工智能与教学的交叉相关的论文和论文集。34 篇论文被纳入分析。亚里士多德的概念episteme(理论-科学知识)、techne(实践-生产知识)和phronesis(专业判断)被用作捕捉教师专业知识的内隐和外显维度的透镜。研究结果表明,人工智能素养是全球新兴的教育研究课题,但在教育技术学领域却几乎空白。文献涵盖了许多不同的主题,并借鉴了不同的方法论。计算机科学和探索性教学方法影响着认识、实践和伦理知识的类型。目前,教师的专业知识在研究中没有得到广泛的关注或体现。伦理问题主要是作为了解数据驱动的人工智能技术的技术配置问题来解决的。教师的实践知识往往转化为采用数字资源进行人工智能教学或将人工智能教育技术融入教学。通过找出几项研究空白,特别是有关教师实践和伦理知识的研究空白,本文加深了对教学中的人工智能素养的全面理解,有助于在教育技术中开展更加知情的人工智能素养教育,并为未来有关教师专业知识的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review

Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy has recently emerged on the educational agenda raising expectations on teachers’ and teacher educators’ professional knowledge. This scoping review examines how the scientific literature conceptualises AI literacy in relation to teachers’ different forms of professional knowledge relevant for Teacher Education (TE). The search strategy included papers and proceedings from 2000 to 2023 related to AI literacy and TE as well as the intersection of AI and teaching. Thirty-four papers were included in the analysis. The Aristotelian concepts episteme (theoretical-scientific knowledge), techne (practical-productive knowledge), and phronesis (professional judgement) were used as a lens to capture implicit and explicit dimensions of teachers’ professional knowledge. Results indicate that AI literacy is a globally emerging research topic in education but almost absent in the context of TE. The literature covers many different topics and draws on different methodological approaches. Computer science and exploratory teaching approaches influence the type of epistemic, practical, and ethical knowledge. Currently, teachers’ professional knowledge is not broadly addressed or captured in the research. Questions of ethics are predominantly addressed as a matter of understanding technical configurations of data-driven AI technologies. Teachers’ practical knowledge tends to translate into the adoption of digital resources for teaching about AI or the integration of AI EdTech into teaching. By identifying several research gaps, particularly concerning teachers' practical and ethical knowledge, this paper adds to a more comprehensive understanding of AI literacy in teaching and can contribute to a more well-informed AI literacy education in TE as well as laying the ground for future research related to teachers’ professional knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does technology-based non-interactive teaching enhance students’ learning in the classroom? Does testing environment matter for virtual school students? What influences teachers’ implementation of ICT in early childhood education? A qualitative exploration based on an ecological-TPACK framework Middle school teachers’ implementation and perceptions of automated writing evaluation University student and instructor experiences with HyFlex learning: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1