DxI 9000 Access 免疫测定分析仪上的 Access HBsAg 和 Access HBsAg 确证测定的性能评估

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Practical Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00390
Benoit Visseaux , Jérémie Gautier , Françoise Le Boulaire , Catherine Coignard , Claire Vincent , Sandrine Gréaume , Isabelle Voisin , Veronique Lemée , Jean-Christophe Plantier , Yves-Edouard Herpe , Etienne Brochot , Stephanie Bord , Marc Turini , Vanessa Roulet , Juliane Hey
{"title":"DxI 9000 Access 免疫测定分析仪上的 Access HBsAg 和 Access HBsAg 确证测定的性能评估","authors":"Benoit Visseaux ,&nbsp;Jérémie Gautier ,&nbsp;Françoise Le Boulaire ,&nbsp;Catherine Coignard ,&nbsp;Claire Vincent ,&nbsp;Sandrine Gréaume ,&nbsp;Isabelle Voisin ,&nbsp;Veronique Lemée ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Plantier ,&nbsp;Yves-Edouard Herpe ,&nbsp;Etienne Brochot ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bord ,&nbsp;Marc Turini ,&nbsp;Vanessa Roulet ,&nbsp;Juliane Hey","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study evaluated the clinical and analytical performances of the Access HBsAg and the Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays were evaluated by comparing the Access assays to the final HBsAg sample status determined using the Architect, PRISM, or Elecsys HBsAg assays, along with Architect or PRISM HBsAg Confirmatory assays. Imprecision, sensitivity on seroconversion panels, analytical sensitivity on WHO, and recognition of HBV variants were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7534 samples were included in the analysis (6047 blood donors, 1032 hospitalized patients, 455 positive patients’ samples). Access HBsAg assay sensitivity and specificity were at 100.00% (99.19–100.0) and 99.92% (99.82–99.97), respectively. Sensitivity of Access HBsAg Confirmatory assay was 100.00% (99.21–100.0) on the 464 HBsAg positive samples. The use of a high positive algorithm for the Access HBsAg assay, wherein samples with S/CO ≥ 100.00 were considered positive without requiring repeat or confirmatory testing, was successfully evaluated with all 450 specimens with S/CO greater than 100.00 (sensitivity 100.00%; 99.19–100.0). Access HBsAg assay demonstrated good analytical performance, equivalent recognition of seroconversion panels compared to Architect assay, and an analytical sensitivity between 0.022 and 0.025 IU/mL. All HBV genotypes, subtypes and mutants were well detected without analytical sensitivity loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays demonstrated robust performances. They provide low samples volume requirements and a simplified process, no systematic retesting for high positive samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article e00390"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000362/pdfft?md5=a16962dc823d09995cdfabbe93ad05f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000362-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation of the Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg confirmatory assays on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer\",\"authors\":\"Benoit Visseaux ,&nbsp;Jérémie Gautier ,&nbsp;Françoise Le Boulaire ,&nbsp;Catherine Coignard ,&nbsp;Claire Vincent ,&nbsp;Sandrine Gréaume ,&nbsp;Isabelle Voisin ,&nbsp;Veronique Lemée ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Plantier ,&nbsp;Yves-Edouard Herpe ,&nbsp;Etienne Brochot ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bord ,&nbsp;Marc Turini ,&nbsp;Vanessa Roulet ,&nbsp;Juliane Hey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study evaluated the clinical and analytical performances of the Access HBsAg and the Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays were evaluated by comparing the Access assays to the final HBsAg sample status determined using the Architect, PRISM, or Elecsys HBsAg assays, along with Architect or PRISM HBsAg Confirmatory assays. Imprecision, sensitivity on seroconversion panels, analytical sensitivity on WHO, and recognition of HBV variants were also evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 7534 samples were included in the analysis (6047 blood donors, 1032 hospitalized patients, 455 positive patients’ samples). Access HBsAg assay sensitivity and specificity were at 100.00% (99.19–100.0) and 99.92% (99.82–99.97), respectively. Sensitivity of Access HBsAg Confirmatory assay was 100.00% (99.21–100.0) on the 464 HBsAg positive samples. The use of a high positive algorithm for the Access HBsAg assay, wherein samples with S/CO ≥ 100.00 were considered positive without requiring repeat or confirmatory testing, was successfully evaluated with all 450 specimens with S/CO greater than 100.00 (sensitivity 100.00%; 99.19–100.0). Access HBsAg assay demonstrated good analytical performance, equivalent recognition of seroconversion panels compared to Architect assay, and an analytical sensitivity between 0.022 and 0.025 IU/mL. All HBV genotypes, subtypes and mutants were well detected without analytical sensitivity loss.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays demonstrated robust performances. They provide low samples volume requirements and a simplified process, no systematic retesting for high positive samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000362/pdfft?md5=a16962dc823d09995cdfabbe93ad05f6&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000362-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言本研究评估了 DxI 9000 Access 免疫分析仪(贝克曼库尔特公司)上的 Access HBsAg 和 Access HBsAg 确证测定的临床和分析性能。材料与方法通过比较 Access 检测法与使用 Architect、PRISM 或 Elecsys HBsAg 检测法以及 Architect 或 PRISM HBsAg Confirmatory 检测法确定的最终 HBsAg 样品状态,评估 Access HBsAg 检测法和 Access HBsAg Confirmatory 检测法的诊断特异性和灵敏度。此外,还评估了不精确度、血清转换面板的灵敏度、WHO 分析灵敏度以及 HBV 变体的识别能力。结果 共有 7534 份样本纳入分析(6047 位献血者、1032 位住院患者、455 位阳性患者样本)。Access HBsAg 检测的灵敏度和特异性分别为 100.00%(99.19-100.0)和 99.92%(99.82-99.97)。在 464 份 HBsAg 阳性样本中,Access HBsAg 确证测定的灵敏度为 100.00%(99.21-100.0)。对所有 450 份 S/CO 大于 100.00 的样本成功评估了 Access HBsAg 检测的高阳性算法,即 S/CO ≥ 100.00 的样本视为阳性,无需重复或确证检测(灵敏度为 100.00%;99.19-100.0)。Access HBsAg 检测法显示出良好的分析性能,与 Architect 检测法相比,血清转换面板的识别率相当,分析灵敏度介于 0.022 和 0.025 IU/mL 之间。所有 HBV 基因型、亚型和突变型都能很好地检测出来,而不会降低分析灵敏度。它们对样本量要求低,流程简化,无需对高阳性样本进行系统性重测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance evaluation of the Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg confirmatory assays on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer

Introduction

This study evaluated the clinical and analytical performances of the Access HBsAg and the Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays on the DxI 9000 Access Immunoassay Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.).

Materials and methods

Diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays were evaluated by comparing the Access assays to the final HBsAg sample status determined using the Architect, PRISM, or Elecsys HBsAg assays, along with Architect or PRISM HBsAg Confirmatory assays. Imprecision, sensitivity on seroconversion panels, analytical sensitivity on WHO, and recognition of HBV variants were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 7534 samples were included in the analysis (6047 blood donors, 1032 hospitalized patients, 455 positive patients’ samples). Access HBsAg assay sensitivity and specificity were at 100.00% (99.19–100.0) and 99.92% (99.82–99.97), respectively. Sensitivity of Access HBsAg Confirmatory assay was 100.00% (99.21–100.0) on the 464 HBsAg positive samples. The use of a high positive algorithm for the Access HBsAg assay, wherein samples with S/CO ≥ 100.00 were considered positive without requiring repeat or confirmatory testing, was successfully evaluated with all 450 specimens with S/CO greater than 100.00 (sensitivity 100.00%; 99.19–100.0). Access HBsAg assay demonstrated good analytical performance, equivalent recognition of seroconversion panels compared to Architect assay, and an analytical sensitivity between 0.022 and 0.025 IU/mL. All HBV genotypes, subtypes and mutants were well detected without analytical sensitivity loss.

Conclusion

Access HBsAg and Access HBsAg Confirmatory assays demonstrated robust performances. They provide low samples volume requirements and a simplified process, no systematic retesting for high positive samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
期刊最新文献
Development of a rapid LFA test based on direct RT-LAMP for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 The measurement of immunosuppressive drugs by mass spectrometry and immunoassay in a South African transplant setting Falsely abnormal serum protein electrophoresis after administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG): A retrospective cohort study Glycated albumin in pregnancy correlates negatively with body mass index and contributes to the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus A novel case of Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis following prenatal diagnosis: Case report from Huizhou, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1