根据 CT 诊断,肝脏 MRI 为符合手术切除或消融结直肠肝转移灶条件的患者带来的附加值:系统回顾和 Meta 分析

B. Görgec, I. Verpalen, J. Sijberden, M. Abu Hilal, S. Bipat, Cornelis Verhoef, R. Swijnenburg, Marc G Besselink, J. Stoker
{"title":"根据 CT 诊断,肝脏 MRI 为符合手术切除或消融结直肠肝转移灶条件的患者带来的附加值:系统回顾和 Meta 分析","authors":"B. Görgec, I. Verpalen, J. Sijberden, M. Abu Hilal, S. Bipat, Cornelis Verhoef, R. Swijnenburg, Marc G Besselink, J. Stoker","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging modality for detection and staging in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in detecting small lesions, guidelines are ambiguous regarding the added value of an additional liver MRI in the surgical workup of patients with CRLM. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical added value of liver MRI in patients eligible for resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT.\n \n \n \n A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through June 23, 2023. Studies investigating the impact of additional MRI on local treatment plan following CT in patients with CRLM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled weighted proportions for the primary outcome were calculated using random effect meta-analysis.\n \n \n \n Overall, 11 studies with 1440 patients were included, of whom 468 patients (32.5%) were assessed for change in local treatment plan. Contrast-enhanced liver MRI was used in 10 studies, including gadoxetic acid in 9 studies. Liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging was used in 8 studies. Pooling of data found a 24.12% (95% confidence interval, 15.58%–32.65%) change in the local treatment plan based on the added findings of liver MRI following CT. Sensitivity analysis including 5 studies (268 patients) focusing on monophasic portal venous CT followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging showed a change of local treatment plan of 17.88% (95% confidence interval, 5.14%–30.62%).\n \n \n \n This systematic review and meta-analysis found that liver MRI changed the preinterventional local treatment plan in approximately one-fifth of patients eligible for surgical resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT. These findings suggest a clinically relevant added value of routine liver MRI in the preinterventional workup of CRLM, which should be confirmed by large prospective studies.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Added Value of Liver MRI in Patients Eligible for Surgical Resection or Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Based on CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"B. Görgec, I. Verpalen, J. Sijberden, M. Abu Hilal, S. Bipat, Cornelis Verhoef, R. Swijnenburg, Marc G Besselink, J. Stoker\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/as9.0000000000000401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging modality for detection and staging in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in detecting small lesions, guidelines are ambiguous regarding the added value of an additional liver MRI in the surgical workup of patients with CRLM. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical added value of liver MRI in patients eligible for resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT.\\n \\n \\n \\n A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through June 23, 2023. Studies investigating the impact of additional MRI on local treatment plan following CT in patients with CRLM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled weighted proportions for the primary outcome were calculated using random effect meta-analysis.\\n \\n \\n \\n Overall, 11 studies with 1440 patients were included, of whom 468 patients (32.5%) were assessed for change in local treatment plan. Contrast-enhanced liver MRI was used in 10 studies, including gadoxetic acid in 9 studies. Liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging was used in 8 studies. Pooling of data found a 24.12% (95% confidence interval, 15.58%–32.65%) change in the local treatment plan based on the added findings of liver MRI following CT. Sensitivity analysis including 5 studies (268 patients) focusing on monophasic portal venous CT followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging showed a change of local treatment plan of 17.88% (95% confidence interval, 5.14%–30.62%).\\n \\n \\n \\n This systematic review and meta-analysis found that liver MRI changed the preinterventional local treatment plan in approximately one-fifth of patients eligible for surgical resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT. These findings suggest a clinically relevant added value of routine liver MRI in the preinterventional workup of CRLM, which should be confirmed by large prospective studies.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000401\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)是结直肠肝转移(CRLM)患者检测和分期的标准成像方式。虽然肝脏磁共振成像(MRI)在检测微小病灶方面优于 CT,但在 CRLM 患者的手术检查中,关于附加肝脏磁共振成像的附加值,指南并不明确。因此,本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估肝脏核磁共振成像对根据CT符合切除或消融CRLM条件的患者的临床附加值。 截至 2023 年 6 月 23 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中进行了系统性检索。纳入了调查CRLM患者CT后追加MRI对局部治疗计划影响的研究。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应荟萃分析法计算主要结果的汇总加权比例。 总共纳入了11项研究,共1440名患者,其中468名患者(32.5%)被评估为改变了局部治疗方案。10项研究使用了对比增强肝脏磁共振成像,其中9项研究使用了钆醋酸。8项研究使用了肝脏磁共振成像和弥散加权成像。汇总数据后发现,根据 CT 检查后肝脏 MRI 的补充结果,当地治疗方案的改变率为 24.12%(95% 置信区间,15.58%-32.65%)。敏感性分析包括 5 项研究(268 名患者),重点是单相门静脉 CT 后进行钆醋酸增强肝脏 MRI 和弥散加权成像,结果显示局部治疗方案的改变率为 17.88%(95% 置信区间,5.14%-30.62%)。 这项系统性回顾和荟萃分析发现,在根据CT符合手术切除或消融CRLM条件的患者中,约有五分之一的患者的肝脏MRI改变了介入前的局部治疗方案。这些研究结果表明,常规肝脏磁共振成像在CRLM的介入前检查中具有临床相关的附加价值,这一点应通过大型前瞻性研究加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Added Value of Liver MRI in Patients Eligible for Surgical Resection or Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases Based on CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abdominal computed tomography (CT) is the standard imaging modality for detection and staging in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT in detecting small lesions, guidelines are ambiguous regarding the added value of an additional liver MRI in the surgical workup of patients with CRLM. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical added value of liver MRI in patients eligible for resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through June 23, 2023. Studies investigating the impact of additional MRI on local treatment plan following CT in patients with CRLM were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled weighted proportions for the primary outcome were calculated using random effect meta-analysis. Overall, 11 studies with 1440 patients were included, of whom 468 patients (32.5%) were assessed for change in local treatment plan. Contrast-enhanced liver MRI was used in 10 studies, including gadoxetic acid in 9 studies. Liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging was used in 8 studies. Pooling of data found a 24.12% (95% confidence interval, 15.58%–32.65%) change in the local treatment plan based on the added findings of liver MRI following CT. Sensitivity analysis including 5 studies (268 patients) focusing on monophasic portal venous CT followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging showed a change of local treatment plan of 17.88% (95% confidence interval, 5.14%–30.62%). This systematic review and meta-analysis found that liver MRI changed the preinterventional local treatment plan in approximately one-fifth of patients eligible for surgical resection or ablation of CRLM based on CT. These findings suggest a clinically relevant added value of routine liver MRI in the preinterventional workup of CRLM, which should be confirmed by large prospective studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Within-hospital Temporal Clustering of Postoperative Complications and Implications for Safety Monitoring and Benchmarking Using ACS-NSQIP Data Association Between Surgeon Sex and Days Alive at Home Following Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study Response to Comment by Dr. Kuang on Our Manuscript “Immediate Oral Refeeding in Patients With Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (PADI trial)” Visual Mapping of Operating Theater Team Dynamics and Communication for Reflexive Feedback and Surgical Practice Optimization Surgical Outcomes and Sociodemographic Disparities Across All Races: An ACS-NSQIP and NHIS Multi-Institutional Analysis of Over 7.5 Million Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1